I’m not a bona-fide audiophile. I’m just a man who, generally speaking, appreciates quality in all things.

In or about the year 2000 I assembled what I’d describe as a mid-range stereo system comprised of the following components:

Receiver: Sony STR-DE825 ($400)
Front: 2 x Infinity Compositions Overture 1 ($1000)
Rear: 2 x Infinity Quadrapole Surround ($300)
Center: Infinity CC2 Center Channel ($300)

My receiver recently went into Protector Mode (suspected to be a result of someone testing the system’s capabilities in my absence) and, as my attempts to clear this condition have failed, I am now left to consider options for replacement.

My question essentially pertains to developments in technology and whether or not new entry level equipment outperforms older (5-10 years) mid-range components. Given that I’m not currently prepared to spend as much as I did previously – which of the three following options (assuming comprehensive research to purchase the best available products in my price range) should be expected to deliver better performance?

1. Keep my (now outdated but previously mid-range) speakers and purchase a new entry level receiver ($250 or less)
2. Keep my speakers and purchase a used mid to high-range receiver that would most likely be 5 or more years old ($250 or less).
3. Sell my speakers (hoping to receive $250 or more) and add that amount to my $250 out of pocket to purchase a boxed home entertainment package ($500 ish)

I could compile a specification comparison to see how my Infinity(s) stack up to new entry level speakers (I’m that type of guy!) but given my lack of technical knowledge I won’t be able to effectively interpret the data. I could compare my system’s performance (from memory) vs an in store package demonstration but wouldn’t be able to compare performance of my speakers with a new entry level receiver.

I’m anxious to hear your expert opinion!

Your time and consideration are greatly appreciated!