Help me Compare Receivers

[shokhead]

Don't think i said they do. I said the one i went to had it.

[GMichael]

Don't think i said they do. I said the one i went to had it.

Didn't mean to imply you did. Only pointed out why there was a misunderstanding and offered a solution.

[shokhead]

Didn't mean to imply you did. Only pointed out why there was a misunderstanding and offered a solution.

It's not cheap in that part for sure.

[aeh10]

Now that I think about it...., this is exactly what happened to me last year with the purchase of my 2807 and I compared it to a comparable Yammy.

I am not satisfied with the Faroudja upscaler which the 3808CI and the 94TXH currently employ, and the Yammy 3800 with ABT upscaler has been subject to negative reviews.

And the Onkyo...(never been a big fan) has that damn HQV chipset in them, why?

So this is what I am thinking...buy a new sub probably an SVS Cylinder,
get rid of the Klipsch synergy 12" it was a floor model and I got exactly what I paid for.

Denon has already employed the HQV chip in their high end 5308CI which costs way more than I want and has more than I need.

My guess is that WIFI connectivity will drop down to their 3000series next year and the HQV chip will go to the 4000series, kind of like how Lexus and Toyota pass of technologies at that time I will reevaluate and buy, my heart is set on Denon, I just like the product, however if more A/V receivers employ WIFI connectivity and the HQV chipset I'll probably repost. Also Denon to me combines the best of both worlds in music and movie audio.

I could be wrong but does Yamaha's tradition and feature set suit music enthusiasts?
and does Panasonic's Elite line tend to match what movie enthusiasts want?

I know its a loaded question and may open up a whole new can of beans but I just wanted to know what people who compared and have the current receivers in question thought.

Thanks everybody for their contribution to my decision