HDMI worse than component video

[pixelthis]

Well......this thread went well...LOLOL

BECAUSE your participation was minor, probably


Sticks, you summed it all up nicely, we can turn off the lights now.

Try turning them on first.

[bobsticks]

Appreciate it if you could translate your gobbledegook yourself, left my universal translator on the Enterprize

Sorry, I used the English language without listing learning tools or reference material.

SORRY if you misunderstood. I don't have a "distaste" for Sony audio products, just the receivers. DO SOMETHING RIGHT or don't do it at all.

You also mentioned the speakers ( I believe there was a comment about a fat lady singing) making it plural.

DIDN'T SAY "MUST", just said they did

Actually what you said was:

Gee, a receiver company making a monitor.
That would be like a monitor company making receivers...oh, wait.
ONE thing about Kuro, it had the right name. A CURIOUS product costing an arm and two legs, with a limited marked(people who pine away for a phosper based product), and
limited distribution.
Wonder it lasted as long as it did

Didn't someone mention somethng about broad conclusions? The devil's in the lack of details, eh?

AND yet failed in the market. Good or bad, doesn't matter if it doesn't sell.

This is completely independent of your assertions.

You are lower than the "village idiot" if you claim not to agree with someone, then demonstrate that you haven't even read their posts. I just don't appreciate having
a bunch of statements attributed to me that I don't even believe.
Like tubes and solid state being the same. ANYBODY who has read my posts knows
how much I hate the regressive tendencies of so called audiophiles in their love of antique gear.

I'll agree that you have taken a no nonsense approach to your audio journey and have been a vocal opponent of "the regressive tendencies" of some...just not so sure someone who routinely engages in non fact-based generalizations and vagaries wants to call someone else "lower than the village idiot" for the sin of assumption.

[pixelthis]

[QUOTE=bobsticks]Sorry, I used the English language without listing learning tools or reference material.

"Used"? More like bent it over and raped it.

I'll agree that you have taken a no nonsense approach to your audio journey and have been a vocal opponent of "the regressive tendencies" of some...just not so sure someone who routinely engages in non fact-based generalizations and vagaries wants to call someone else "lower than the village idiot" for the sin of assumption.

If your comprehension of "facts" were the standard, there wouldn't be any.

AND AS FAR as "generalizations", every scientific law is a "generalization".
Please try to keep up, thanks.

[bobsticks]

If your comprehension of "facts" were the standard, there wouldn't be any.

AND AS FAR as "generalizations", every scientific law is a "generalization".
Please try to keep up, thanks.

There are facts that I know and there facts that I do not know. I have suppositions and opinions. I try not to include the latter three in discourses on fact or the implication thereof. Clearly you have opportunities in this regard.

"Used"? More like bent it over and raped it.

Oh no, my friend, I engaged the language with a knowing glance and allowed for its coquettish response...I served the language an intricate but not ostentatious '91 Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin, whispered things of great intimacy in the language's ear and lay in gentle repose until, trembling, the language succumbed in libidinous supplication.

[Sir Terrence the Terrible]

Try turning them on first.

Pix, there are no lights on when dealing with you, and that is part of the problem. I was referring to the discussion.