-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woochifer
Just more cut-and-paste political nonsense to divert attention from your cluelessness on the original topic -- rant, wash, rinse, repeat. Nothing new from you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
NOT SO "clueless" as to be an unpaid lab rat for a tech that has
crashed and burned more than socialist utopias.
SHOULD not care, when the lawyers are getting rich and you
are seeing a therapist to learn how to see normally it will almost be funny.
ALMOST.:1:
Thanks for proving my point. :cool:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny B. Galt
Poultrygeist- How do you like the physical appearance of the ST? I've read reviews of it being "chunky" and the shiny bezel being distracting. Do you even notice? That's about the only thing holding me back right now. Since I'm getting a new set I almost think it should look sleek... I know, a minor and petty thing when the picture is what really matters...
You could also try looking up Costco's offerings. I know that in prior years (including my model), the TVs that Panasonic sold through Costco were renumbered and fitted with matte bezels. My TV is the exact same Panasonic model that was sold at other retailers, except that it added a PC input and replaced the shiny bezel.
-
The bezel on the ST is a handsome piano gloss black which isn't a problem for me. Rather than clunky I'd say it looks substantial. I like the large bezel as I like my pictures in frames. Don't think I could get use to those frameless models.
There were some screen reflections from the adjoining room windows but two $7 room darkening curtains from Walmart fixed that.
This 55 inch fits perfectly on the really nice stand I bought from Sams Club for $199. This stand beats anything I saw at Best Buy and hhgregg.
I couldn't be happier with this purchase..
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poultrygeist
The bezel on the ST is a handsome piano gloss black which isn't a problem for me. Rather than clunky I'd say it looks substantial. I like the large bezel as I like my pictures in frames. Don't think I could get use to those frameless models.
There were some screen reflections from the adjoining room windows but two $7 room darkening curtains from Walmart fixed that.
This 55 inch fits perfectly on the really nice stand I bought from Sams Club for $199. This stand beats anything I saw at Best Buy and hhgregg.
I couldn't be happier with this purchase..
IT HAS to be "substantial" to hide the much more bulky glass envelope that is a plasma screen.:1:
-
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woochifer
Thanks for proving my point. :cool:
IF YOU'RE talking about the one on top of your head ,
glad to oblige.
ACTUALLY 3D and plasma go together nicely, as both are going to be in the technological graveyard before you know it.:1:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
IF YOU'RE talking about the one on top of your head ,
glad to oblige.
ACTUALLY 3D and plasma go together nicely, as both are going to be in the technological graveyard before you know it.:1:
As usual, nothing new to add to the topic. That conversation with the voices inside your head must be quite a riot :out:
-
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woochifer
As usual, nothing new to add to the topic. That conversation with the voices inside your head must be quite a riot :out:
AT LEAST I have something inside my head. AND you don't have anything new to add either, save gushing praise for
plasma because it resembles the phosper based CRT you grew up with, and 3D because you don't recognize rehashed antique tech
that should have Edsel as a brand name. :1:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixelthis
AT LEAST I have something inside my head. AND you don't have anything new to add either, save gushing praise for
plasma because it resembles the phosper based CRT you grew up with, and 3D because you don't recognize rehashed antique tech
that should have Edsel as a brand name. :1:
Repeat yourself much? Or are you doing your double posting trick yet again? :3:
|