View Poll Results: What kind of Hifi system do you have set up ?

Voters
46. You may not vote on this poll
  • 2 channel amp/rec, and you live 2-channel (balanced)

    5 10.87%
  • 2 channel amp/rec, and you live 2-channel (unbalanced)

    12 26.09%
  • 5 channel amp/rec, 2 speakers, and prefer 2 channel

    3 6.52%
  • 5 channel amp/rec, 2 speakers, and prefer 5+ channel

    0 0%
  • 5+ channel amp/rec/spkrs, live 2 channel (balanced)

    3 6.52%
  • 5+ channel amp/rec/spkrs, live 2 channel (unbalanced)

    3 6.52%
  • 5+ channel amp/rec,speakers, live 5 channel

    1 2.17%
  • Have both (as seperate systems), prefer 2 channel

    15 32.61%
  • Have both (as seperate systems), prefer 5+ channel

    4 8.70%
  • Have nothing and starting a new system

    0 0%
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 46
  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    198

    Lightbulb What hifi system type do you have set up ?

    Hello it will be interesting to find out just how popular (at least out of our bunch of Hifi gurus,
    just how popular 5+ channel is, and how much have stayed faithful to the 2-channel.

    There should be enough options for you to be in one of them.

    5+ channel basically covers every combination "MORE" than 1x pair of speakers.
    i.e. 1x pair of fronts plus centre speaker, 1x pair of fronts, plus subwoofer, 4.1 speakers
    5.1 speakers, 6.1 speakers, 6.2 speakers, 7.1 speakers, 11.1. etc.

    I have a personal interest to find out just how many of you have a "balanced" connection
    of your components.

    Addition : If you happen to have 3 or MORE systems, please vote in one of the Have both.
    I cannot edit the choices anymore.

    Feedback is of course welcome.

    The poll threads do not allow me to add any more than 10 options. I'm sure this is one of the
    fewer ones which give that many.

    If you recall a character in one of the Black Adder series, it's just funny the way he says this...

    Quote : "Please accept my apo-logies".
    Last edited by OzzieAudiophile; 04-04-2008 at 05:40 PM.

  2. #2
    I took a headstart... basite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mortsel, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Earth
    Posts
    3,056
    2 channel for my system only.

    if I want to see a movie, I go upstairs and use dad's surround system

    Keep them spinning,
    Bert.
    Life is music!

    Mcintosh MA6400 Integrated
    Double Advent speakers
    Thiel CS2.3's
    *DIY Lenco L75 TT
    * SME 3012 S2
    * Rega RB-301
    *Denon DL-103 in midas body
    *Denon DL-304
    *Graham slee elevator EXP & revelation
    *Lehmann audio black cube SE
    Marantz CD5001 OSE
    MIT AVt 2 IC's
    Sonic link Black earth IC's
    Siltech MXT New york IC's
    Kimber 4VS speakercable
    Furutech powercord and plugs.

    I'm a happy 20 year old...

  3. #3
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    I have both. My stereo system has speakers of significantly higher quality that cost about 3 times as much as the model used in my home theater. Yet I find multi-channel audio to offer a more realistic imaging and soundstage. It's enough that it overcomes the lesser quality gear in my 5.1 system, which sort of makes sense, the speakers in the 5.1 system aren't working as hard and not revealing as much of their limitations as a result. There's also something to be said for the increased resolution the channel separtion provides.

    I prefer the 5.1 sound only if we compare mulit-channel audio like SACD to 2-channel audio. For 2 channel comparison only, the stereo wins straight up of course, hi-rez or otherwise.

  4. #4
    _ Luvin Da Blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    _
    Posts
    1,951
    I recently sold off my 5.2 HT system for a balanced 2ch rig. To be honest, with the presentation and imaging that my stereo rig gives, I don't really miss it for movies or TV. Actually the sound and presentation is more natural for the most part considering that the screen is not 360 degrees. Just my thoughts.

    I have my old 5.1 system (non digital) in my bedroom for the odd time I want MC.
    Back in my day, we had nine planets.

  5. #5
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by OzzieAudiophile
    There should be enough options for you to be in one of them.
    You missed one:

    **Have both systems and find each does a better job for the specific task

    For music, I prefer a well executed two channel system (at least for my budget). For movies, I prefer a multi channel system. I find the requirements for each are different.

    rw

  6. #6
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    I have three systems.
    System one is a 7.1 system. Multi-channel is great for music recorded that way and HT. Other than that it gets used in 2 channel mode. The two front speakers cost me more than the rest of the system put together.
    System two is a 6.1 system and gets used the same as system one, although all the speakers are the same.
    System three is a 2.0 system and leaves little room for anything else. No TV included. Just a pool table and a few chairs.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  7. #7
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127

    Balanced

    Quote Originally Posted by OzzieAudiophile
    Hello it will be interesting to find out just how popular (at least out of our bunch of Hifi gurus,
    just how popular 5+ channel is, and how much have stayed faithful to the 2-channel.

    There should be enough options for you to be in one of them.

    5+ channel basically covers every combination "MORE" than 1x pair of speakers.
    i.e. 1x pair of fronts plus centre speaker, 1x pair of fronts, plus subwoofer, 4.1 speakers
    5.1 speakers, 6.1 speakers, 6.2 speakers, 7.1 speakers, 11.1. etc.

    I have a personal interest to find out just how many of you have a "balanced" connection
    of your components.

    Feedback is of course welcome
    I'm not sure you ought to be so concerned about balanced vs. single-ended. Most people have both in their systems. For example, I used balance connections between my preamp and monoblock power amps and single-ended connections elsewhere. In my case this make sense because my preamp and amps are both fully balanced. Furthermore the amp manufacturer explicitly states that better performance will be achieved with balanced connections; (he explained why but the explanation is technically too complicated for me to accurately pass on).

    In general, (and there might be exceptions), internally single-end components are best joined by single-ended connections. This makes sense because additional ciruitry is certainly necessary in the source to create the balanced output, then (possibly) more needed in the target (depending on its design) to recombined the balanced input. Between single-ended components the extra complexity is only justified in case of long cable runs or in environments with a lot of electrical noise, (because balanced connections have very high inherent external noise rejection).

    I have both stereo (for music), and m/c (mostly for HT), systems. I "prefer" the stereo only because it has higher grade components: in a perfect world I would have a dedicated m/c system for music with high-grade components.
    Last edited by Feanor; 04-04-2008 at 11:12 AM.

  8. #8
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,421
    I have 3 2ch and a 5.1 minus the rear speaks.
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Luxman DA-06 DAC
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Dual Martin Logan Original Dynamo Subs
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

  9. #9
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    198
    rw. I would of believed the one you recommended was the reason people put two
    systems together in the first place.

    I guess I should be a little more clear, of the two systems, one is not a new system,
    one is an old, un-dissasembled one.

    I didn't have enough space on the line to say, 2 seperate systems purchased on purpose
    specifically for 2-channel, and 5+ channel.

    I highly value your input Mr Stat.

  10. #10
    Audio Hobbyist Since 1969 Glen B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    517
    Quote Originally Posted by OzzieAudiophile
    I have a personal interest to find out just how many of you have a "balanced" connection of your components.

    Feedback is of course welcome
    You should have included "unbalanced" and "balanced" options for those with separate systems.

    I have separate 5.1 and 2-channel systems and run the latter all-balanced, except for the connection between my turrntable and preamp which is single-ended. I prefer the sound of the system in balanced mode, with the added benefit of more secure XLR connections. I have a disdain for locking RCAs.

  11. #11
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by OzzieAudiophile
    rw. I would of believed the one you recommended was the reason people put two systems together in the first place.
    Hmmm. I have the separate systems for two reasons:

    1) Allows wife to watch her TV programs while I listen to music upstairs. She is the greater videophile.
    2) I am far more interested in audio and the quality of the systems is vastly different.

    I discussed this with Sir TtT a while back and we have different thoughts on this. It is my belief that for a given (non-astronomical budget) one must necessarily compromise the overall sonic quality of a MC system vs. an equivalently priced two channel one. He believes the benefits of MC alone counter the required choice of lower quality system components. To each his own.

    BTW, I do not use balanced cabling. FWIW, Harry Pearson used to use balanced connections with his main music system in Room 3, but found no benefit with his environment and choice of components.

    rw

  12. #12
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    198
    Hello E-Stat and Feanor, thanks again, as well as to the rest of you guys.

    I have hit a bit of a crossroad myself in terms of upgrading my system.

    Please view my thread in the amps section, E-Stat, I know you've been there before.

    I'll add more comments in that thread regarding Balanced, and how that will either help,
    or hinder my final decision in terms of what I will end up getting.

    Cheers.

  13. #13
    Ajani
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    Hmmm. I have the separate systems for two reasons:

    1) Allows wife to watch her TV programs while I listen to music upstairs. She is the greater videophile.
    2) I am far more interested in audio and the quality of the systems is vastly different.
    I'm likely to end up with 2 systems for those exact same reasons + an inexpensive bedroom system for a third reason...

    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    I discussed this with Sir TtT a while back and we have different thoughts on this. It is my belief that for a given (non-astronomical budget) one must necessarily compromise the overall sonic quality of a MC system vs. an equivalently priced two channel one. He believes the benefits of MC alone counter the required choice of lower quality system components. To each his own.
    For a given price point I'd much rather have a good two channel setup than a MC one, as I believe that the increase in quality of the speakers, amp and cd player will outweigh any advantages of MC using inferior quality components.... but clearly MC lovers will feel differently.... in my case, spending my budget on MC would make even less sense, as I own zero MC discs.... so I'm much better off trying to get the most benefit out of my existing CD collection, than building a setup to maximise the potential of SACDs/DVD-As that I don't have.

  14. #14
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Two channel and I am a little unbalanced. I have listened to multi channel systems but I did not care for them for music. Since I rarely watch a TV of any size I do not spend money on video. I toyed with the idea of buying a dvd player but then the urge passes. If I am at home music is playing.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  15. #15
    Forum Regular aevans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    144
    I own lots of equipment, but 2 channel balanced is the only thing I have had hooked up in the past 2 years.. just can't do without it..

    I can speak for the balanced hook up as having something a little better(different) with my setup.

    My equipment is all kinergetics, and they were known for doing some strange things with balanced connections, tossing caps into the lines, little pieces of wire, etc and then using that to filter out those types of sound paterns via the balanced connection.. They even had something similar built into their CD players.. two completely seperate dac's and opamp paths, one running in reverse polarity and then amplifying the differance in the signals in a final opamp.

    For the Kinergetics brand balanced mode has huge gains.. I just wish the amps were not so friggin hot.

  16. #16
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    198
    JohnMichael, it just sounds a bit funny

    You said "Two channel and I am a little unbalanced." - they have some pills for that lol.
    (just kidding)

    I'll add the necessary point in the thread, I thank you all for making additional
    recommendations for this poll, however if you have put a poll up on this site, you are
    permitted to no more than 10 choices.

  17. #17
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Quote Originally Posted by OzzieAudiophile
    JohnMichael, it just sounds a bit funny

    You said "Two channel and I am a little unbalanced." - they have some pills for that lol.
    (just kidding)


    It was meant to be funny and I hope you enjoyed it as I enjoyed your response. Welcome to AudioReview.

    Good thread and poll.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  18. #18
    I put the Gee in Gear.... thekid's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    VB VA
    Posts
    2,307
    Good question.

    Thankfully with the help of this community I am a little better off than I was a couple of years ago system wise.

    Initially I got into the whole HT 5:1 due to the allure of surround sound/DVD experience. Thought my Bose 201/161 set-up worked just fine for movies and music. Added 2 more HT systems to the house (MB and son's room) and thought I was set.

    Bought some vintage speakers that changed my mind about listening to HT for music. Got into vintage 2-channel about 6-months ago and have not looked back. Still listen to music on the 5:1 set-ups when listening for short periods of time because the integrated amps have sleep timers.

  19. #19
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    198
    Here's lookin at ya kid ? (Boghart).

    I have been told that some models of Bose speaker system permits you to set up 3
    "sweet spots" in a room. Can your Bose system do that ?

    Thanks for Welcoming me aboard JohnMichael. I feel like part of a fine soldier of
    Caesar's Elite Legion.

    JohnMicael... sounds like a figure that was pulled from the Gods above.

    aevans - sounds like a nice setup. I'm curious are any of your components balanced
    to balanced cables are over 1 metre ? Or are they all 1 metre or less ?

  20. #20
    Forum Regular aevans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    144
    All less than 1 meter, it's more a function of the equipment than your regular noise reduction stuff.

  21. #21
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    884
    Our main music system is 2.1 with excellent monitor speakers and a quite capable subwoofer.

    Our HT system is also 2.1 with some very good monitor speakers and a small subwoofer. We use an A-V receiver so we could do surround sound. Whether we prefer 2 channels is an open question.
    "Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony."
    ------Heraclitus of Ephesis (fl. 504-500 BC), trans. Wheelwright.

  22. #22
    I put the Gee in Gear.... thekid's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    VB VA
    Posts
    2,307
    [QUOTE=OzzieAudiophile]Here's lookin at ya kid ? (Boghart).

    I have been told that some models of Bose speaker system permits you to set up 3
    "sweet spots" in a room. Can your Bose system do that ?

    Oz

    Thanks for asking but no, when I mention my Bose set-up I am referencing that I have 201's for my fronts and 161's for the rear and a VCS-10 center channel. That set-up has now been relegated to my MB HT. It is fairly decent for 5:1 but musically I have moved past Bose.

    My current main HT is actually a mismash of some of the vintage speakers I have been picking up in the past year. My mains are a pair of RtR Series IV's a Sony center channel and a pair of Infinity RS.4's for the rears. The RtR's image amazing well and they provide a large sweet spot for the viewing area. I am not sure if it is dumb luck or a testament to the Auto Set-up feature in my Pioneer but this diverse group of speakers sounds very very good for HT.

  23. #23
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    198
    Well from the votes so far, it appears we have peeps that have a preference more for
    2-channel than for 5+ channel.

    Please if you read this read, do vote. Take pride in your babies, tell me about your system
    as well. So far I've heard some nice setups. 30+ years ago, a good proportion of us would
    of shared the same systems. Now it's most likely no one would have the same setup.

    Pity we all live so far away from each other, we could bring some components over to
    each other's houses, hookem up and compare/find out how it's like. Some components
    brands go very well with others.

    A lot of us you will know you want/need to change/upgrade your system. The USA and
    Europe peeps have been blessed to have more choice of brands/components. The bad
    part is that even though there's more cream, there's also more rubbish. In my part of
    Australia, we have much less of both.

    I've seen/heard lots of appealing features in one brand or another, it's nearly never the case
    where most of these nice features all exist within the same component.

  24. #24
    Forum Regular aevans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    144
    If you are from australia check out these guys: http://www.bursonaudio.com/
    I have the buffer that they sell, makes cheap sources sound like 5k setups. The cost to ship and the current exchange rate make them cost prohibative for me, but I plan on using the preamp that they offer once the american dollar gets back on it's feet. Even with the shipping cost it's one of the best deals I ever got based on price performance.

  25. #25
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    198
    Cheers aevans.

    I'll check it out, added it to my favourites.
    Current System :

    Xindak XA8800MNE Mono Block Power Amplifier
    Cambridge Audio 840E Pre Amplifier
    Cambridge Audio 840C CD Player and DAC
    Dynaudio Contour 1.8 MK-II
    Pioneer DVR-640H (250 GB HDD)
    Foxtel Digital
    Samsung LCD 40in LA40M81BDX
    Sony PS 3 (source - CD/SACD/DVD/Blu-Ray)
    XLO Interconnects & speaker cables
    Sonos Wireless Music System

    Upgrade Path :

    1. Power regulation system

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •