Results 1 to 25 of 26

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    I think the portable HD makes the most sense -- I hate the idea of those lithium batterries because tibasically makes the thing disposable (I hate the waste). RCA has a little MP3 player that takes SD cards -- I use the SD card in my camera -- the thing is $129.00. and would be more than good enough for the bus and trains.

    My laptop is fairly new under a year old. It would be nice if the external HD would not need to be plugged into the wall -- the little expensive ones you can power through the USB but no big deal.

    I am signing a 1 year contract to teach K-1 kids -- they want to be immersed in English very young when language is best learned.

    I am bringing my HD 600's and I need a headphone amp because mine is too heavy and bulky. So I may opt fopr the stereo link DAC. the advantage of this unit is that it completely bypasses the DAC in the computer and directly sends the info from USB cable into the unit. The unit is also a Headphone amplifier and can also connect to a stereo. It's cheap enough as well at $170.00. http://www.stereo-link.com/Static/Products.html

    I'm going to be selling my X-Box in order to buy this link dac thingy and hopefully sell my 300 disc player.

  2. #2
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127

    Thanks for the Stereo-link link

    Quote Originally Posted by RGA
    I...

    I am bringing my HD 600's and I need a headphone amp because mine is too heavy and bulky. So I may opt fopr the stereo link DAC. the advantage of this unit is that it completely bypasses the DAC in the computer and directly sends the info from USB cable into the unit. The unit is also a Headphone amplifier and can also connect to a stereo. It's cheap enough as well at $170.00. http://www.stereo-link.com/Static/Products.html

    ...
    .
    The device is the concept I've been thinking about for a while but hadn't found. This unit has the right functionality and price.

    By the way the external HD is a no brainer if walk-around portability for your whole collection is not a priortity. I have an iPod Mini which as more than enough capacity for my portable needs. I load a few day's worth of listening from my main HD, (an external attached to my desktop), to my iPod and away I go. Personnally if I were buying a portable player today, I'd go for the Apple Nano.

    At the office I don't listen to music, but people who do most often use portable HD attached to their company-provided laptops or desktops.

  3. #3
    Big science. Hallelujah. noddin0ff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    X
    Posts
    2,286
    Since you have a laptop. I'd consider getting a 2.5" external hard drive and an enclosure. You could upgrade your laptop's hard drive with it and then use the one you took out as an external. Win-win. There's also a portability benefit because enclosures for 2.5" drives are just about pocket sized.

    The downside is that 2.5" drives for laptops are more expensive per Gig than 3.5". But if you consider it an upgrade for your laptop...that takes the sting out.

    I've bought most my laptop drives here

    and 2.5" enclosures here

    Putting a drive in an enclosure is simple. I've had very good experiences with the IBM/Hitachi Travelstar drives.

  4. #4
    test the blind blindly emorphien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    919
    I don't think a 2.5" external drive is going to be wise for him in this situation. As he said the 60gb players don't hold enough for him and laptop hard drives reach 100gb, which isn't much improvement. A 250-300 gb hard drive in an external 3.5" enclosure (I recommend Mapower if you can get it in Canada, I know newegg has them) will be more cost effective and hopefully hold most if not all of his collection.

    The laptop can certainly store some data though, but 2.5" drives just aren't that cost effective.

    edit: and that macsales site is a bit pricy for those hard drives, probably for the enclosures too but I'm not going to bother comparing to newegg, zzf, chiefvalue and the like

  5. #5
    Big science. Hallelujah. noddin0ff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    X
    Posts
    2,286
    Quote Originally Posted by emorphien
    I don't think a 2.5" external drive is going to be wise for him in this situation. As he said the 60gb players don't hold enough for him and laptop hard drives reach 100gb, which isn't much improvement. A 250-300 gb hard drive in an external 3.5" enclosure (I recommend Mapower if you can get it in Canada, I know newegg has them) will be more cost effective and hopefully hold most if not all of his collection.

    The laptop can certainly store some data though, but 2.5" drives just aren't that cost effective.

    edit: and that macsales site is a bit pricy for those hard drives, probably for the enclosures too but I'm not going to bother comparing to newegg, zzf, chiefvalue and the like
    I'll let him decide what's wise, but I mostly agree on the $/GB argument. Just presenting another kind of option. Good point on the prices. Newegg was about 7-12% less on list price.

    Seagate has a 160GB 2.5" but it's over $300. Still less than an iPod though.
    The value per gig is in favor of 3.5". However, portability, the upgrade factor, and the backup drive factor should be considered. Having everything as 2.5" means that you have a ready replacement for when your laptop HD fails (if you install an OS on it).

  6. #6
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    thanks for the suggestion -- but I think i will go for a little less in the way of portability and go with mass storage -- I am considering this 250gig unit for $161.00 Cad http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applicatio...5613&CatId=530

    For a bit more they have a beefed up case (indistructable hard drive -- lol let's get the sledge hammer out to see. http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applicatio...4218&CatId=530
    Last edited by RGA; 01-23-2006 at 11:27 AM.

  7. #7
    Big science. Hallelujah. noddin0ff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    X
    Posts
    2,286
    Quote Originally Posted by RGA
    thanks for the suggestion -- but I think i will go for a little less in the way of portability and go with mass storage -- I am considering this 250gig unit for $161.00 Cad http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applicatio...5613&CatId=530

    For a bit more they have a beefed up case (indistructable hard drive -- lol let's get the sledge hammer out to see. http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applicatio...4218&CatId=530
    good prices for $CAD! I probably don't need to mention this but make sure your computer supports USB2.0 otherwise you're stuck with transfer at USB1.1 and that is painful. Make sure you post the before and after Sledge-O-Matic shots.

  8. #8
    test the blind blindly emorphien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    919
    Quote Originally Posted by noddin0ff
    Seagate has a 160GB 2.5" but it's over $300.
    Ahh that's true I forgot those were out now. It's so expensive I tend to stop paying attention to the high end 2.5" drives.

    Sounds like he's going to go with the 3.5" drive though from the post above this... $300 buys you about what, 400 or 500 gigs now? That one drive is bigger than the two in my deskop combined.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •