Results 1 to 25 of 28

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    It's just a hobby
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    808
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeE SP9
    I hope the chart below is helpful.
    I was looking for something about the typical content of acoustic recordings across a variety of genres as opposed to how low each instrument can go, thanks though.
    It's a listening test, you do not need to see it to listen to it!

  2. #2
    Phila combat zone JoeE SP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,710
    Quote Originally Posted by theaudiohobby
    I was looking for something about the typical content of acoustic recordings across a variety of genres as opposed to how low each instrument can go, thanks though.
    It looks as though no one has answered your question. I suspect it's because it's a "new" question.

    I'm tempted to answer, "It depends". First you have to define "typical" and maybe even "acoustic". Then there is musical selection. I would imagine that different listeners having different tastes would get different results.
    Get a copy of REW (Room Equalization Wizzard) at http://www.hometheatershack.com/ and you can find out for yourself based on your collection.
    ARC SP9 MKIII, VPI HW19, Rega RB300
    Marcof PPA1, Shure, Sumiko, Ortofon carts, Yamaha DVD-S1800
    Behringer UCA222, Emotiva XDA-2, HiFimeDIY
    Accuphase T101, Teac V-7010, Nak ZX-7. LX-5, Behringer DSP1124P
    Front: Magnepan 1.7, DBX 223SX, 2 modified Dynaco MK3's, 2, 12" DIY TL subs (Pass El-Pipe-O) 2 bridged Crown XLS-402
    Rear/HT: Emotiva UMC200, Acoustat Model 1/SPW-1, Behringer CX2310, 2 Adcom GFA-545

  3. #3
    It's just a hobby
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    808
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeE SP9
    It looks as though no one has answered your question. I suspect it's because it's a "new" question.

    I'm tempted to answer, "It depends". First you have to define "typical" and maybe even "acoustic". Then there is musical selection. I would imagine that different listeners having different tastes would get different results.
    Get a copy of REW (Room Equalization Wizzard) at http://www.hometheatershack.com/ and you can find out for yourself based on your collection.
    Thanks, I will follow your suggestion and get a copy of REW. For a while now, I get the feeling that in general acoustic programs dip below 70~80Hz only occassionally as opposed to modern synthesized bass programs where going very low is a fairly regular occurence.
    It's a listening test, you do not need to see it to listen to it!

  4. #4
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    506
    Quote Originally Posted by theaudiohobby
    ...I get the feeling that in general acoustic programs dip below 70~80Hz only occassionally...
    You should probably refine that into several separate categories of acoustic music.

    If you're listening to the early works of Peter, Paul & Mary where it is them singing and two guitars, you're right. If you're a pipe organ aficionado or love large scale orchestral works, your theory is wrong. There is a lot of territory in between those two points.

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Just to show how my mind works when I first read the title and part of the post this is what sprang to my mind. Acoustical recordings have a very narrow range of frequencies. Of course it may vary based on the size of horn on your gramophone. An electrical recording of acoustic instruments can cover a very wide range.

    http://classicalrecordings.org/zacou...ics/index.html


    Anyway back to the question JBL used to have a demo/test record they gave out at audio shops when they were introducing new models. One of the tracks was to show that as long as a speaker could produce a solid 50hz frequency that should satisfy most music lovers. Of course many tecnological advances have happened since then. I have always found low bass difficult to achieve in my smaller living spaces so I tend to stay away from speakers with low bass and find 50hz is enough for me.
    Last edited by JohnMichael; 08-07-2010 at 06:25 PM.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  6. #6
    Phila combat zone JoeE SP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,710
    Any program that does RTA with a Spectrum Analyzer type display will work for determining relative distribution of frequencies. I thought of REW first because I've been using it recently to make my room sound better.
    ARC SP9 MKIII, VPI HW19, Rega RB300
    Marcof PPA1, Shure, Sumiko, Ortofon carts, Yamaha DVD-S1800
    Behringer UCA222, Emotiva XDA-2, HiFimeDIY
    Accuphase T101, Teac V-7010, Nak ZX-7. LX-5, Behringer DSP1124P
    Front: Magnepan 1.7, DBX 223SX, 2 modified Dynaco MK3's, 2, 12" DIY TL subs (Pass El-Pipe-O) 2 bridged Crown XLS-402
    Rear/HT: Emotiva UMC200, Acoustat Model 1/SPW-1, Behringer CX2310, 2 Adcom GFA-545

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •