Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 30 of 30
  1. #26
    Sure, sure... Auricauricle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    2,886
    Thanks for the egoshot, Worfster!

  2. #27
    Ajani
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Worf101
    Forget the insults of these cretins, you're far more right than you know. And as for Miller's interpretation, Ajani, you're quite correct. I only wish they'd been able to interpret his "Daredevil" as well as they did his Batman. In some ways they did but the public wasn't ready to see a oxycotton munching superhero, I guess they are now.

    Da Worfster
    Actually I'm one of the half dozen people who liked Daredevil (especially the even darker director's cut - which filled in some of the plot holes in the cinematic release)... I think Daredevil failed with audiences: 1) Because it was ahead of it's time... People weren't really ready for such a dark and depressing interpretation of a Superhero 2) The plot was rather weak (especially in the standard version of the film)... I think they got the characters spot on... both personality wise and powers... But had they invested in a really good plot, they might have pulled off the whole dark, pill-poping Superhero bit.... 3) People seem to really dislike Ben Afleck....

  3. #28
    Sure, sure... Auricauricle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    2,886
    Mebbe...mebbe....I think that the public likes dark interpretations of heroes. The superguy who has a dark side is far more interesting than the bright and sunny superguy. Who's more popular: Batman or Superman? I have not seen Dared Evil, but it does sound interesting... And yes, what is it about Afflicted, anyway? Is he actually a two by four with a face or does he actually exist?

    And what's all this about race horses? I like race horses...especially ponies....Oh, nevermind!
    Last edited by Auricauricle; 11-06-2008 at 03:54 PM.

  4. #29
    Ajani
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Auricauricle
    Mebbe...mebbe....I think that the public likes dark interpretations of heroes. The superguy who has a dark side is far more interesting than the bright and sunny superguy. Who's more popular: Batman or Superman? I have not seen Dared Evil, but it does sound interesting... And yes, what is it about Afflicted, anyway? Is he actually a two by four with a face or does he actually exist?

    And what's all this about race horses? I like race horses...especially ponies....Oh, nevermind!
    Good points... there is a reason why Batman and Wolverine are more popular than Superman and Captain America... part of it is that heros with a dark side seem to have more depth to them... A super-powered boyscout dressed in his red, white and blues is really hard to relate to for most people....

    Though you might want to keep in mind that a hero with a dark side is different from a dark film... Batman Begins is not a dark film (especially when compared to The Dark Knight) but in both movies, Batman clearly had a dark side... Begins was easier to swallow for many fans, as it left them with a much happier ending and overall tone to the film...

  5. #30
    Sure, sure... Auricauricle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    2,886
    Totally agree.....I think this is why David Cronenberg movies appeal to so few...and so many...! Mebbe he should do the next Batman?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •