Interesting choices, but I'm not really surprised by them. I could side with not liking any of those, except Pulp Fiction, which I personally think is one of the top 5 movies of the 90s. Your synopsis is wrong, most of the characters in the movie survive. And where you see it all as a patchwork of unrelated scenes, the fact is, it's ALL weirdly and wonderfully related! It's like you weren't paying attention, I guess.

But yeah, 3 Men and a Baby is a colossal turd. I bet it's as unwatchable and dated today as Ghost or Look Who's Talking. Add Home Alone to the same list. Why were these movies so popular?

I can't stand the Lord of the Rings movies. Hate 'em. They're as bloated and pretentious as a 2-disc Yes Album from the mid-'70s. They feel like those stiff Cecil B. MeMille bible epics from the '50s–so serious because they are about Religion, but the LOTR flicks are just a total fantasy. I'm completely mystified by their popularity. Perhaps it's because I never liked the Tolkein books or played D&D, so I can't relate. In a similar vein, I was about 18 when Where the Wild Things Are book was released and I never had kids, so I don't even have ANY idea what this thing is about and I am totally not getting why anyone should get even 1/10th this excited about a movie. It looks positively awful. A total snore.

Then there's Titanic. And Dances With Wolves. 2 of the worst movies to ever win a best picture oscar®. Watch them today without being warmed up by the all out media blitz they had on first release. They suck!

I think the Nolan Batman movies are vastly over-rated too. Eye-rollingly serious and idiotic. More movies that will NOT stand the test of time.

It's so easy to be a hater. How about movies that you LOVE that no one else liked, instead? Stuff like the Coen Brothers remake of The Ladykillers or Castaway. Nobody but me likes those movies.