Hey Mark. Are A/B tests worthless?

[markw]

I make no bones about having an issue with the claims that are made here based on supposedly valid or reliable tests that have been run in the past.

However, I note that you have totally ducked my request that you document your accusation that I am "wont" to change the subject. Simply expanding the scope of your accusation as you just did in your most recent post doesn't constitute documentation. It simply constitutes expanding the scope of your unsubstantiated allegation.

Well, I see you’re back to playing games again by you denying your own actions. Phil, if you would even bother to re-read that last long thread on bi-wiring, you will plainly see where you were the one to constantly keep dragging up DBT’s, again and again.

Here's the kicker, guy. The thread was about bi-wiring, not DBT's. Who constantly tried to force the focus back to DBT's? Not I.

It's like you are one trick pony. All you want to do is argue DBT's, no matter what the subject at hand. And, in some fashion or another, you will try to bend the subject to your liking. ...and you wonder why I accuse you of acting like a liar, er... lawyer.

Now, if your own words are not "substantiation" enough for you, then I guess it’s a lost cause trying to carry on a meaningful discssion with you. So much for a meaningful discussion, eh?

Oh well, I guess it’s back to lawyer jokes.

An attorney was cross-examining a coroner.

The attorney asks, "before you signed the death certificate, did you take the man's pulse?" The coroner says, "No."

The lawyer then asks, "Did you listen for a heartbeat?" "No" says the coroner.

"Did you check for breathing?" Again, the coroner says, "No."

"So," the lawyer continues, "when you signed the death certificate, you had not taken any of the usual steps to make sure the man was dead, had you?"

The coroner, now tired of the browbeating, says, "Well, let me put it this way. The man's smashed brain was sitting in a police labeled jar on my desk, but for all I know, he could have been out there practicing law somewhere."

TTFN. If I hear any new ones, I'll let ya know.

[WmAx]

So much for a meaningful discussion, eh? Oh well, I guess it’s back to lawyer jokes.

I believe that pctower uses this forum primarily as practice for his debating skills. Most of the tactics I have noticed being employed by Phil can be found on how-to-debate lessons published online. I have read these tactics in the past. Seems to me that their main point is to not settle anything, but instead cause more confusion and to strike during this confusion. Does this sound familiar?

-Chris

[pctower]

I believe that pctower uses this forum primarily as practice for his debating skills. Most of the tactics I have noticed being employed by Phil can be found on how-to-debate lessons published online. I have read these tactics in the past. Seems to me that their main point is to not settle anything, but instead cause more confusion and to strike during this confusion. Does this sound familiar?

-Chris

If I had to depend on the debating skills I employ on this board to earn a living, I'd starve to death. This is pre-school in comparison to the league I play in.