Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 35
  1. #1
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,421

    Bluejean Cables #2

    I just received my 2nd set of BJC's analog IC's. My first pair was used to replace the monster cable m950i's that I was using between my preamp and amp. This made a noticeable improvement in the high frequency's with more forward treble and increased resolution and detail. Overall it improved the sound.

    I just placed the 2nd pair between my DAC and preamp replacing my monster m1000i's and the results were not so good. After about 2hours of listening the music appears more grainy and busy for lack of a better term. The m1000's gave a more liquid, warmer sound with better bass.

    I'll give the BJC's another 20hrs of break in and see if the sound improves and post my impressions then. But I have a feeling that I will end up using the combo of the m1000's and BJC instead of 2 sets of the BJC's.
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Luxman DA-06 DAC
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Dual Martin Logan Original Dynamo Subs
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

  2. #2
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    I cant understand why placing them between the DAC and Pre would be different unless its not a good fit with the VA Dac which may require a more sophisticated cable. I would give it more breakin time. Most good cables require about 300 hours of break in time to fully take advantage of what it was engineered to do. You've got some pretty good and expensive gear Raven, especially that nice Parasound amp that you have...I'm wondering if you have ever got the best performance out of your gear with the monster and bluejean cable? You just may be due for a cable upgrade with the gear you have. I think at one time you had audioquest but was not a good cable for you. I can get you a good deal on some A+ cables if you like?

    frenchmon
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  3. #3
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    Ever compare the M950 to the M1000? If the M1000 is better than the BJC why not use two sets of M1000?

  4. #4
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,421
    The m1000 is better than the 950i. The m1000i's got a good review in a British Magazine and I've never thought that they sounded bad. And for $30 on ebay they were a good buy. I might try some more expensive cables. I'm satisfied with the BJC's from the pre to the amp. What kind of deals on the A+ cables Mr. P?
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Luxman DA-06 DAC
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Dual Martin Logan Original Dynamo Subs
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

  5. #5
    Vinyl Fundamentalist Forums Moderator poppachubby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Analog Synagogue
    Posts
    4,363
    Blackraven, time to look into solid core if you're wandering the vast fields of speaker cable.

    http://www.essex.ac.uk/csee/research...bles_1985).pdf

    Here's Hawksford's personal contact info. He is completely accessible, I emailed him a couple of questions and within a week he responded.

    http://www.essex.ac.uk/csee/research...e_malcolm.html

  6. #6
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    Frenchmon, is the one who bought the A+. Not sure how much he paid for speaker cables. I believe the 1 meter RCA was around $70.00 for the model that retailed at $99..
    I'll point him your way and maybe he can PM you some info.

  7. #7
    Suspended atomicAdam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Oaktown!
    Posts
    1,774
    I've been using the BJC between my Simaudio Moon LP3 phono amp and my AVA Omega III pre-amp, and Granite Audio #470 between the AVA Omega III pre amp and either the Jeff Rowland or the AVA OmegaStar.

    I found the BJC to give a tighter, punchier bass but lacked a bit in the soundstage compared to when I used the Granite Audio #470 between the phono & pre and pre & amp.

    That was in the old apartment. This new place in SoCal is offering a new set of challenges to set up. Have to pick all your minds soon about this.

  8. #8
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    Adam, you have a Jeff Rowland? Go on with your bad self.

    BJC is good for mid fi, it has it's limits. It's easily bested by higher quality brands entry level cables and that may be where to go if you have what you'd consider high end gear. For instance, there was a easily noticeable extension in both bass and trebel when going from BJC to Transparent.

  9. #9
    Suspended atomicAdam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Oaktown!
    Posts
    1,774
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    Adam, you have a Jeff Rowland? Go on with your bad self.

    BJC is good for mid fi, it has it's limits. It's easily bested by higher quality brands entry level cables and that may be where to go if you have what you'd consider high end gear. For instance, there was a easily noticeable extension in both bass and trebel when going from BJC to Transparent.

    I'd be interested in hearing the Transparent after all the good talk on the forums.

    I've got a Jeff Rowland in for another couple weeks for review. The 102. The review will be posted on Dagogo.com but I'll post up a link in the forums.

    So far, after some power cord tweaking, I'm diggin it.

  10. #10
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    Adam, you have a Jeff Rowland? Go on with your bad self.

    BJC is good for mid fi, it has it's limits. It's easily bested by higher quality brands entry level cables and that may be where to go if you have what you'd consider high end gear. For instance, there was a easily noticeable extension in both bass and trebel when going from BJC to Transparent.

    And that is my point exactly. The higher end gear may require a more sophisticated cable to let all the engineering of the high end component come through. The lower end cable may not be able to handle the technology of high end gear.

    frenchmon
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  11. #11
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    Quote Originally Posted by atomicAdam
    I'd be interested in hearing the Transparent after all the good talk on the forums.

    I've got a Jeff Rowland in for another couple weeks for review. The 102. The review will be posted on Dagogo.com but I'll post up a link in the forums.

    So far, after some power cord tweaking, I'm diggin it.
    What does a unit like that cost? And is it tubes?

    frenchmon
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  12. #12
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by blackraven
    After about 2hours of listening the music appears more grainy and busy for lack of a better term. The m1000's gave a more liquid, warmer sound with better bass.
    They need break in. I use both the LC-1 analog and 1694 digital cable and found them to be intolerably bright for a while (the Belden 1694 in particular). You will need far more than twenty hours. I ran an old DVD player as transport non-stop to the DAC for about a week!

    rw

  13. #13
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat
    They need break in. I use both the LC-1 analog and 1694 digital cable and found them to be intolerably bright for a while (the Belden 1694 in particular). You will need far more than twenty hours. I ran an old DVD player as transport non-stop to the DAC for about a week!

    rw
    When I got the A+ cable the first and second pair I ran all night and all day none stop until it started to sound better, but out of the box they sounded better than what I was using.The third pair got broken in with the dealers breakin machine. But the A+ speaker wire was a different story out of the box. I was so disappointed and afraid they where not going to sound any better at all. Out of the box they sounded awfull. But only after a few days of running day and night did they start sounding like they where loosening up. Now they sound much better eith much better imaging. They still are not fully broken in. I do know his BJC needs more than 20 hours...more like 75 to hear improvement and then 150 hours and more to be fully broken in.

    frenchmon
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  14. #14
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    That Dagogo gig seems to be a nice deal, how do you get linked up as a reviewer?

  15. #15
    nightflier
    Guest
    After struggling with big heavy cables for years, I tried Kimber just based on the practicality of their thin and easily managed cables. Well a year later, my top-performing entry-level IC is still the little Kimber PBJ. I know it sounds weird, but it bests cables 2-3 times as expensive. But I wouldn't discount system synergy, either - maybe the PBJs are just the right thing for my gear.

    On the minimalist side of cables, I've also been intrigued with the claims made by Pierre Sprey over at Mapleshade (website is currently under construction), but I can't bring myself to pay $30-60 for something that really looks that cheap. That said, I've been told by several people that it outperforms the PBJs by a considerable amount. The other thing I'm wondering about these is if I could simply build similar cables like that myself using good quality solder-less plugs. Anyhow, it may be worth a look-see-hear.

  16. #16
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    928
    Quote Originally Posted by frenchmon
    When I got the A+ cable the first and second pair I ran all night and all day none stop until it started to sound better, but out of the box they sounded better than what I was using.The third pair got broken in with the dealers breakin machine. But the A+ speaker wire was a different story out of the box. I was so disappointed and afraid they where not going to sound any better at all. Out of the box they sounded awfull. But only after a few days of running day and night did they start sounding like they where loosening up. Now they sound much better eith much better imaging. They still are not fully broken in. I do know his BJC needs more than 20 hours...more like 75 to hear improvement and then 150 hours and more to be fully broken in.

    frenchmon
    A question comes to mind. Will full break-in always result in maximum improvements in overall sound with a specific interconnect? In your system or mine, I would think there has to be an optimum where synergy with the system results. What if, as with the situation where there was improvement "out-of-the-box", this was optimum and continued break-in resulted in less than synergistic results?

    Since break-in results in the "settling" of cable parameters (resistance, capacitance, inductance) it seem logical continued break-in may result in parameters outside the combination for synergy? Seems we're always shooting at a moving target. If cable designs achieve their optimum at full break-in, is the same goal optimum for all system configurations. Isn't transparent, transparent? How small/large is the window?

  17. #17
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    Quote Originally Posted by bfalls
    A question comes to mind. Will full break-in always result in maximum improvements in overall sound with a specific interconnect? In your system or mine, I would think there has to be an optimum where synergy with the system results. What if, as with the situation where there was improvement "out-of-the-box", this was optimum and continued break-in resulted in less than synergistic results?

    Since break-in results in the "settling" of cable parameters (resistance, capacitance, inductance) it seem logical continued break-in may result in parameters outside the combination for synergy? Seems we're always shooting at a moving target. If cable designs achieve their optimum at full break-in, is the same goal optimum for all system configurations. Isn't transparent, transparent? How small/large is the window?
    If the cable says it takes 300 hours to fully break in, then I doubt I have fully broken in my speaker cable.I would think there comes a time down the road, if we have good cable, we will have maximum enjoyment from our system. I believe I have a very favorable point of synergy with my system now. Will it continue to evolve in an improved sound? As audio hobbyist, we surely would hope so. I would think the engineers of the cable would design cable to do what it was engineered to do and no more. So I doubt that less than synergistic results would be an issue unless its a bad cable or we get gear with a performance out side of the cables range.

    I thought transparent was transparent as well... until I got the Xray and did a shootout. The XRay was very transparent with great air. Then I took my XRay over to Mr. Peabodys house and while the XRay continued to amaze me with transparency and tone connected to his Conrad Johnson tubed gear, MrPeabodys T+A CDP was the most transparent CDP I have ever heard....I mean the transparency was very detail and more air. Thats when I thought to my self, there are really more levels of transparency. My interconnect cables, Analysis Plus are very good cables at $99 dollars per meter. I have 3 pair and Analysis Plus speaker cable that sells for $119 per 8 feet. all giving very good synergy in my system. Analysis Plus cable is a warm cable with great detail. But its their low end of cable. I did a shootout with Mr.Peabodys cable...Siltech cable which is maybe 3 times more expensive and is not the low end cable from Siltech. I think he has Siltech speaker cables as well all connected to his main system. The shootout revealed the Siltech to be more transparent and detailed than my cheaper Analysis Plus cable....my point??? Transparency has a larger window than we think...and until we start shooting out gear and cable we will never discover how small or big the window is. Isn't that part of the fun of being a hobbyist?

    frenchmon
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  18. #18
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    I believe if there is any break in for a cable it will do after break in what it did out of the box but better. The cable won't continue to change after reaching it's point of broke in, at least that is my theory. To be honest this is one place I have not heard a difference. Maybe it was that the cable made an improvement initially and any break in was so gradual I didn't notice. What would be a good test is to take two brand new sets of cables and burn one set in with a Cooker and do nothing to the other then compare the two sets to see if any difference could be noticed between them. I really don't think we have to worry about cables continuing to evolve in sonic character.

  19. #19
    frenchmon frenchmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    St. Charles Mo
    Posts
    3,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    I believe if there is any break in for a cable it will do after break in what it did out of the box but better. The cable won't continue to change after reaching it's point of broke in, at least that is my theory. To be honest this is one place I have not heard a difference. Maybe it was that the cable made an improvement initially and any break in was so gradual I didn't notice. What would be a good test is to take two brand new sets of cables and burn one set in with a Cooker and do nothing to the other then compare the two sets to see if any difference could be noticed between them. I really don't think we have to worry about cables continuing to evolve in sonic character.
    Wylie broke in my third set of A+ interconnects the maxium of 300 hours over three days on his cooker while I used the first and second pair of unbroke in cables in my system out of the box. He too wanted to know if I could hear a difference in a fully broken in cable and cable that I used out of the box in my sytem. But I forgot to shoot them out once I got home to see if there was a difference. I suspect I would not have heard a difference.

    But what I can tell you is the A+ speaker cable was a different story. Brand new out of the box the cable was terrible to the point I thought the cable was not as good as the interconnects and worse that the cheap speaker cable I was replacing. But I continue to let it burn in and after a day it still did not sound any better. After a few days, the cable did start to evolve and it did reach its potential and synergy with the other cables after about 4 or 5 days. According to the engineers, its still not fully broken in but to my ears its sounding very good. If its to reach even a better performance, I doubt if it will be audable.

    frenchmon
    Music...let it into your soul and be moved....with Canton...Pure Music


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    W10 i5 Quad core processor 8GB RAM/Jriver 20/ Fidelizer Optimizer/ iFI Micro DSD DAC-iUSB 3.0/Vincent SA - T1/Vincent SP-331 MK /MMF-7.1/2M BLACK/MS Phenomena ll+/Canton Vento 830.2

  20. #20
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,421
    Are these DH Labs Air Matrix IC's or any of the others any good?

    http://www.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls....abs-Air-Matrix

    or these Krell Cast cables

    http://buy.audiogon.com/cgia/fsb.pl?...tr&1&ctg&st251

    Acoustic Zen WOW-

    http://www.upscaleaudio.com/Acoustic-Zen-WOW_p_307.html

    http://www.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?cablintr&1267205984&/Acoustic-Zen-WOW!
    Last edited by blackraven; 01-08-2010 at 11:09 PM.
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Luxman DA-06 DAC
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Dual Martin Logan Original Dynamo Subs
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

  21. #21
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    I would probably not use the Krell cables since I expect they were designed specifically to compliment their gear.

    I haven't heard them but an audio acquaintance told me the Acoustic Zen is very good.

    Not that familiar with DH Labs but it seems some one here uses them.

  22. #22
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    Frenchmon, does A+ give any reason why their cables need break in?

  23. #23
    Suspended Smokey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Ozarks
    Posts
    3,959
    Quote Originally Posted by bfalls
    A question comes to mind. Will full break-in always result in maximum improvements in overall sound with a specific interconnect? In your system or mine, I would think there has to be an optimum where synergy with the system results. What if, as with the situation where there was improvement "out-of-the-box", this was optimum and continued break-in resulted in less than synergistic results?
    That is an excellent question, and this is where cable break-in theory goes wary and falls apart because theory is based on hearsay rather than proven scientific facts.

    Cable break-in may have many positive facts, but it also have its negatives facts also. So if anybody that believe in cable break-in should also accept the fact that break-in process might not stop at optimum stage and as you said, miss full synergy window as it continue evolving. One can’t have it both ways.

  24. #24
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    Posts
    10,176
    So when you buy a new pair of shoes and get them broke in they will continue to change until they don't fit any more?

    When a speaker is new and then put into operation it takes a while for the voice coil to loosen up and let the speaker function within it's full capacity. It will break in to the parameters it's user operates it in. Once it reaches those parameters and operates within them break in is done. What is there to keep it changing?

    I realize we are talking about cable and I acknowledge myself I'm not sure what there is to break in on a cable. If there is break in on a cable, and I don't doubt some one because I haven't noticed it, then I would imagine it would follow the same pattern of anything requiring break in. It functions until certain normal parameters are met and that would be it.

    Hypothetically, let's say a cable is A new and B at break in point, if you preferred a certain tonal balance between A and B, maybe you liked it not completely broke in, then your ideal balance would be lost, past up. At that point you would have to settle for what you have or search for a cable that is closer to your ideal response at final break in. You'd also have to ask yourself do the cables sound better in my system at break in than whatever I had prior.

  25. #25
    Suspended Smokey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Ozarks
    Posts
    3,959
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    So when you buy a new pair of shoes and get them broke in they will continue to change until they don't fit any more?
    If a person is way overweight and fat, then yes

    But joking aside, you really can not compare speaker (or shoe) break in with cable since one have dynamic nature while the other have static nature. So the same rule does not apply.

    If there is break in on a cable, and I don't doubt some one because I haven't noticed it, then I would imagine it would follow the same pattern of anything requiring break in. It functions until certain normal parameters are met and that would be it.
    That does seem like a common sense approach, but problem here is that “certain normal parameters” will never be met since the signal cable is carrying is AC which is always in state of change. So any cable parameters that is effected by the AC signal is also changing too.

    For example, if cable get charged up like a capacitor during the upswing of signal, the charge will be dismissed during the downs section of signal.

    Hypothetically, let's say a cable is A new and B at break in point, if you preferred a certain tonal balance between A and B, maybe you liked it not completely broke in, then your ideal balance would be lost, past up. At that point you would have to settle for what you have or search for a cable that is closer to your ideal response at final break in. You'd also have to ask yourself do the cables sound better in my system at break in than whatever I had prior.
    Then hypothetically, cable manufacture should put a warning label on their cable that cable's sonic quality should be judged during break-in period, not after-since the end result might not be what they want.
    Last edited by Smokey; 01-10-2010 at 03:44 AM.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •