MIT was quite audible. It removed anything resembling treble from a couple different systems we tried it on. It was not subtle, and it was easy to conclude that MIT wasn't for me. It's easy to hear. But MIT isn't "just wire" they have components inline also. Obviously an induced resistance.

You should read the patent on the cable which is useless. The cable box is a filter for RF, not audio signals.
I'd rather see a DBT compariosn to be sure of differences.


They can, by rolling off the treble response. That's easy to hear, and measure.

Only if it is large enough magnitude. The, the cable is a poor design, broken cable.



I have been waiting for years for you to provide us with a list of your reference-class stereo main system from which you make all your assertions. I bet it's less accurate and neutral and revealing than mine, ergo less valid of a test bed. Lets hear it, you have JBL speakers, Denon reciever and what sources?

Irrelevant, especially as I make no claims for audibility of anything. It is you who has to demonstrate audibility, YES. You cannot pass the burden of proof. It will remain in your court until you stop making claims for differences unsupported by credible evidence.



--It's measurable.

What is measured?



Poor insulation, parallel conductors= radiated loss.

Poor insulation causes losses? Hogwash. parallel conductors with signals in opposite direction tends to cancell out most everything. And, if you can measure it, doesn't mean a thing that it robs your speakers of signal, LOL.



The DNM speaker cable output is a lot less than the input.

How much? Inductance and resistance has nothing to do with it? Really? And, so what. Turn up the volume control by 1/2dB.



I have test equiptment at my shop that measure everything from spectral analysis to micro signal levels.

Good for you. And the results are? Caused by what? Magnetic field radiation? LOL. Where did the resistance loss, inductance loos gone? Mythology?



but when confronted and challenged to list your own system truthfully,

You Just Don't Get IT!!! I don't really need a system, not even a boom box, to make comment here, take you to task to prove your fantastic claims of fancy. Try to remember that, what I have has no relevance on what you can hear or cannot hear and claim to hear. ZERO.


well at least FEAR3000 had a revealing system

You you claim it to be revealing? Based on name brand or demonstrably revealing? Prove it.



If people knew you have a relentlessly midfi system, it would let a lot of your hot air out.


Ah, facts are established by what I have or don't have. What you can hear and claim to hear. LOL. You are too funny for words.


It also depends on:
1) Quality and accuracy of the system you own. Which I a skeptical that you have one , or know what one sounds like.
2) That you are not actually tone deaf as I have suspected for years.

Hogwash. All it depends on is what you can demonstrate, unbiased. You have no evidence of that, hence you have unreliable hype, nothing more.
Why don't you just pretend I am deaf altogether. That will put you out of your misery waiting for what I have or don't have.

Compiling the data from your posts (before and after you got banned for a while)

Really?



I can make a strong case for saying you just can't hear, because you have abnormally poor hearing. That is a very good possibility. .


Then it is settled. No need to agonize anymore what I don't have. But, you are still on th ehot seat to demonstrate your claims for audibility. Rather simple. Your court, cannot leave your court. Check mate.