Quote Originally Posted by skeptic
When he says that the distortion is masked, he needs to back it up with equations showing how and why and others to show how and why his procedure overcomes the problem. As far as I can tell, he hasn't done that. And he hasn't shown why the current test equipment which can measure such infinitesmal distortion levels gives erroneous results. All I have is his verbal assurances which are not adequate for me.
Too bad the archives here are lost. He has on more than one occasion tried to say it is because the commonly available test equpment uses averaging. Of course the flaw in that argument is that the measurement is steady-state and the use of averaging acutually improves the noise floor by averaging it out, because it is an uncorellated(random) signal, and therefore actually improves the measurement accuracy.

-Bruce