-
pulled trigger on class d audio
Well after hearing a lot of press about them I finally decided to pull the trigger on a class D audio amp and it is ordered and on its way. i decided to give the 440c amp a try since it have more than enough power for almost any speaker I will likely be getting in the future and should be a good match with my Dynaudios. I will be retiring my Adcom to use it for a rear channel amp since it is getting older and needs a more relaxed job and the rear channels in my system should be a good place for that. Will let you guys know what I think after it comes in and I have a chance to listen to it.
-
Congrats, keep us updated. I'm really interested in how they drive the Danes.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by harley .guy07
Well after hearing a lot of press about them I finally decided to pull the trigger on a class D audio amp and it is ordered and on its way. i decided to give the 440c amp ...
Hope you enjoy it, Harley. We await your impressions.
I've generally enjoyed my 258, the most transparent amp I've owned and the best for accurate instrument timbres. IMO, the CDA amps are by no means "tube-like" as their descriptions say (or used to). They are the antithesis of "veiled" or grainy but don't deliver "harmonic richness" or long "decays" that aren't actually in the recording. They are ultra-neutral but some will fine them bright.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
Hope you enjoy it, Harley. We await your impressions.
I've generally enjoyed my 258, the most transparent amp I've owned and the best for accurate instrument timbres. IMO, the CDA amps are by no means "tube-like" as their descriptions say (or used to). They are the antithesis of "veiled" or grainy but don't deliver "harmonic richness" or long "decays" that aren't actually in the recording. They are ultra-neutral but some will fine them bright.
That almost sounds like a good description of my Counterpoint amp.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by harley .guy07
Well after hearing a lot of press about them I finally decided to pull the trigger on a class D audio amp and it is ordered and on its way. i decided to give the 440c amp a try since it have more than enough power for almost any speaker I will likely be getting in the future and should be a good match with my Dynaudios. I will be retiring my Adcom to use it for a rear channel amp since it is getting older and needs a more relaxed job and the rear channels in my system should be a good place for that. Will let you guys know what I think after it comes in and I have a chance to listen to it.
Congrats! The 440C looks like a great deal. I can't wait to hear your impressions.
-
Congrat's Harley. I wonder of digital amps need time to break in like tubes or ss...you will be finding out soon.
-
Congrats!. I think that you will really like the smooth sound of these amps. They produce a very nice tight and deep bass and have no grain. I do however find the sound to lean a little bit on the sunny side. Placing some 0.5ohm resistors in my MMG's fixed the problem
-
Congrats Harley! I cant wait to read your thoughts..I wonder how well it will do with your NU-FORCE preamp. Are you going to try that configuration?
-
I cant seem to find that amp at CLass D Audio....do you have a link?
-
-
-
yes sir I am going to try the Nuforce preamp with the class d audio to see how it works together. I should think it should work fine and I ordered balanced cables since both units use balanced cables and I will let you know when it gets here and I get a chance to hear it for myself and see if it lives up to what people are talking about.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
but don't deliver "harmonic richness" or long "decays" that aren't actually in the recording.
Built in reverb feature? Which products should we avoid in that regard?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Stat
Built in reverb feature {"decays")? Which products should we avoid in that regard?
Dunno, ask RGA, he's the guy who talks about decays and how they're missing from solid state amps and generally most things except SETs.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
Dunno, ask RGA, he's the guy who talks about decays and how they're missing from solid state amps and generally most things except SETs.
I see. You've never heard this phenomena yourself. Perhaps you are misstating something he's said. Can you point to anything in particular?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Stat
I see. You've never heard this phenomena yourself. Perhaps you are misstating something he's said. Can you point to anything in particular?
No, I'm not misstating him; perhaps I'll look for quotes at some point.
Decay? Yes, the trailing edge of notes, e.g. of piano, revealing instrument timbre as sound dies away. Yes, I've heard that. It is RGA's contention the tube amps, especially SET, have more natural sound of decays -- i.e. one he likes better.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
Yes, I've heard that. It is RGA's contention the tube amps, especially SET, have more natural sound of decays .
Well, that is clearly different from "long decays that aren't in the recording".
I would agree that some amplifiers render micro dynamics better than others.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Stat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Originally Posted by Feanor
Yes, I've heard that. It is RGA's contention the tube amps, especially SET, have more natural sound of decays.
Well, that is clearly different from "long decays that aren't in the recording".
...
I think not; he has described s/s decays as being "short".
"Long" decays would presumably be related to the "harmonic richness/fullness" characteristic of (some) tube amps. As I've stated on many occasions, my hunch is that this is an artificiality of these designs.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
I think not; he has described s/s decays as being "short".
Really.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
"Long" decays would presumably be related to the "harmonic richness/fullness" characteristic of (some) tube amps.
Presumably? You cannot "extend" a decay with harmonic distortion. You can change its tone, but not duration. That's reverberation.
Still wondering what you read you give you this strange notion that tube amps add reverberation to recordings.
You say you've never heard that before. Neither have I! before.
Edit: did a search on "decay" by RGA. What I find is he uses this term somewhat differently than do I. First of all, he says panel speakers never get this right. Huh? Right. Nearly massless drivers cannot convey the time domain correctly.
Anyway, I found one reference to "better decay" as in the qualitative sense. Its that low level detail to which I earlier referred.
What I also found was something that completely contradicts your assertion that it is the additive harmonic content (which you cannot hear - and I've proven that to myself with tests) is responsible. Read this post again:
distortion only affects..
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Stat
...
You cannot "extend" a decay with harmonic distortion. You can change its tone, but not duration. That's reverberation.
Still wondering what you read you give you this strange notion that tube amps add reverberation to recordings.
Extended decays are RGA's notion, not mind. As for reverberation or "false ambience" as I've described it, I heard this from my tube preamp.
Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Stat
...
Edit: did a search on "decay" by RGA. What I find is he uses this term somewhat differently than do I. First of all, he says panel speakers never get this right. Huh? Right. Nearly massless drivers cannot convey the time domain correctly.
I'm with you there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Stat
...
Anyway, I found one reference to "better decay" as in the qualitative sense. Its that low level detail to which I earlier referred.
What I also found was something that completely contradicts your assertion that it is the additive harmonic content (which you cannot hear - and I've proven that to myself with tests) is responsible. Read this post again:
distortion only affects..
The "something" you refer to in in this instance is assertion by RGA which I don't necessarily agree.
How about this gem of concentrated rubbish?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RGA
...
In other words the great tube amp may be giving you 95% of what is on the recording and adding 5% in various distortion artifacts but it a SS amp may only be providing 70% of the recording and .0005% distortion but it has missed 25% of what is really there on the recording
...
I don't know what causes tube artifacts, I have only hypothesised that it's distortion. You assert that you have proven to yourself that you can't hear tube distortion; have you run the same sort of test to determine whether you can hear .001% THD that contains levels of high-order distortion produced by decent s/s amps?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
Extended decays are RGA's notion, not mind. As for reverberation or "false ambience" as I've described it, I heard this from my tube preamp.
Added noise alone will add false ambience when your comparison is to using no preamp - as I have done. That has nothing to do with the nature of the active device or its harmonic structure. Or, you just had a poor example of tube electronics. Is that company still in business? How many different tube line stages have you heard ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
You assert that you have proven to yourself that you can't hear tube distortion
What I assert is that using the online distortion test I posted about years ago, I could not resolve lower than 2% harmonic distortion. I invited you to challenge your preconceptions and you declined.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
; have you run the same sort of test to determine whether you can hear .001% THD that contains levels of high-order distortion produced by decent s/s amps?
I have not but would expect a very different result. First of all, you remain stuck in the static world. Circuits, especially those with negative feedback, perform differently in the dynamic world than the static and averaged world - where such measurement are taken. Instantaneous distortion can be many multiples of steady state.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Stat
...
What I assert is that using the online distortion test I posted about years ago, I could not resolve lower than 2% harmonic distortion. I invited you to challenge your preconceptions and you declined.
...
I'm willing: lend me you VTLs for a couple of months.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
I'm willing: lend me you VTLs for a couple of months.
It is sad that while the internet has brought us together from afar, we can rarely share the experience together.
I know there are some guys here who have been able to meet each other and share listening. I was able to visit a retired engineer from AA during a business trip. I ended up leaving way after midnight and had an early appointment the next day. There just wasn't enough time.
BTW, the amps were shipped strapped together on a pallet via trucking line. They weigh more than I do.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Stat
It is sad that while the internet has brought us together from afar, we can rarely share the experience together.
I know there are some guys here who have been able to meet each other and share listening. I was able to visit a retired engineer from AA during a business trip. I ended up leaving way after midnight and had an early appointment the next day. There just wasn't enough time.
BTW, the amps were shipped strapped together on a pallet via trucking line. They weigh more than I do.
I'd love to hear 'em. You have a standing invitation to visit whenever you're in this neck of the woods, BTW.
:16:
-
Interested to see your thoughts after you try it out harley.
|