Results 1 to 16 of 16

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326
    I would say that different designs contribute greatly to a different sound. However, the basics of amplification architecture have been well developed for the past 40-50 years, and most modern designs are based on these well worn models. Some designs like the Tri-Path and ICE based amps are relatively new, and the Halcro amps uses a propriatary design, but most of what else is out there are based on tried-and-true designs.
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  2. #2
    Sophisticated Red Neck manlystanley's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In Old Pickup Truck, Cruising Hickville
    Posts
    651
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoffcin
    I would say that different designs contribute greatly to a different sound. However, the basics of amplification architecture have been well developed for the past 40-50 years, and most modern designs are based on these well worn models. Some designs like the Tri-Path and ICE based amps are relatively new, and the Halcro amps uses a propriatary design, but most of what else is out there are based on tried-and-true designs.
    Great points. One side note, I didn't make my points initially very clear. I was trying to summarize the research that I had done about the quality of the lower end Chinese audio products vs the DIY option that I decided to go with.

    In that regard, what impact does a 'famous' audio design have on sound quality versus quality components. My conclusions is that the older designs are very solid but that newer designs are better and that lower end components detract from the sound as well.

    BTW: the higher end Chinese options I'm really intrigued with. They seem to be some very solid products.

    Best Regards,
    Stan
    Listening/Movie Room: ADCOM GTP-500, XPA-2, Denon 3930ci, Front: Jamo C809; Surround: Klipsch R-5650-S; Back: R-5650-S; Denon AVR-687,. Projector: Sharp XR-32X.

    Family Room: Denon avr-687, Denon CD player, Klipsch RB-5II

  3. #3
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127
    Quote Originally Posted by manlystanley
    Great points. One side note, I didn't make my points initially very clear. I was trying to summarize the research that I had done about the quality of the lower end Chinese audio products vs the DIY option that I decided to go with.

    In that regard, what impact does a 'famous' audio design have on sound quality versus quality components. My conclusions is that the older designs are very solid but that newer designs are better and that lower end components detract from the sound as well.

    BTW: the higher end Chinese options I'm really intrigued with. They seem to be some very solid products.

    Best Regards,
    Stan
    I think your conclusions are very reasonable, Stan, especially on the quality issue. Bear in mind the board layout as well as quality of components can also effect sound.

    Nevertheless one wonders how much tube designs have really improved. I've heard that higher quality components are available today, so that might effect the designs, (just speculation on my part). Board layout is critical especially for digital and class D modules, but maybe less so for tube stuff.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •