Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 30 of 30
  1. #26
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
    Any experience with Ayre? This one's quite a lot more money than the Threshold, though ... HERE
    Unfortunately, my experience is limited to the Ayre IBE disc.

    I've heard only good things about their components and I've enjoyed reading Charles Hansen's posts on AA.

  2. #27
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat View Post
    Unfortunately, my experience is limited to the Ayre IBE disc.

    I've heard only good things about their components and I've enjoyed reading Charles Hansen's posts on AA.
    Thanks. Apparently Ayre amps are a classic case of measure bad / sound good.

  3. #28
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
    Thanks. Apparently Ayre amps are a classic case of measure bad / sound good.
    AX-5 Measurements

    "It was a pleasure to measure Ayre's AX-5, given its consistently good behavior on the test bench. Its wide bandwidth and low distortion despite the lack of overall loop feedback are a testament to the intrinsic linearity of the diamond circuit.—John Atkinson"

    They look good to me, too. Nice smooth square wave response. If by *bad*, you mean largely irrelevant "double ought" THD numbers, I find that a blessing from a sonic standpoint. I'll take an "intrinsically linear" amp to one pumped up by lots of NFB anytime.

  4. #29
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127
    Quote Originally Posted by E-Stat View Post
    AX-5 Measurements

    "It was a pleasure to measure Ayre's AX-5, given its consistently good behavior on the test bench. Its wide bandwidth and low distortion despite the lack of overall loop feedback are a testament to the intrinsic linearity of the diamond circuit.—John Atkinson"

    They look good to me, too. Nice smooth square wave response. If by *bad*, you mean largely irrelevant "double ought" THD numbers, I find that a blessing from a sonic standpoint. I'll take an "intrinsically linear" amp to one pumped up by lots of NFB anytime.
    Yes, those measurements are very decent but they are for the latest/greatest "diamond circuit" AX-5 model. I was referring specifically to those for the 10 y/o Ayre V-3, HERE. These are nowhere near as good.

    I was noticing a Ayre V-3 MkII for sale on Audiogon. I might be able to afford that but certainly not to the $10,000 AX-5.

  5. #30
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127

    The Forté 5 with an active preamp

    My Audio Research (ARC) LS9 preamp arrived today and I've had a few hours listening, mostly to the Forté 5.

    Having found a passive preamp, (Jolida JD50A), very satisfactory with the Class D Audio SDS-258, I was surprised how much improvement of the Forté 5 was wrought by the active LS9. The PRaT deficit of the Forté 5 is largely (though maybe not entirely), closed with the active pre.

    Now the Forté 5 is much more competitive with the SDS. The latter still has an edge in tighter, leaner bass, and some fine advantage in transparency & air.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •