Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 32
  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13

    Bookshelf Speakers <= 500$

    Hello Everyone,

    I am looking to graduate from a run-down pair of computer speakers to a nice pair of bookshelf speakers. I mostly listen to classical, but also listen to an assortment of acoustical, rock, and most anything else that pleases my ears. I also watch movies and occasionally play games.

    What would you suggest for speakers at or under 500$? At the moment, I'm considering B&W dm602, wharfdale 9.2, and a DIY by gr-research called neo-2x (total cost ~ 500). If you can, please include links to supporting expert reviews, any anecdotal personal experiences, etc...anything that helps me learn about the speaker you're suggesting.

    Thanks,
    Ray

  2. #2
    Retro Modernist 02audionoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,908
    What sort of amp will you be using?

  3. #3
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    For now, I'd being using an old B&O beomaster 2000 that has only 25w output. My next step after getting the speakers, however, would be to upgrade my amp. Thus, I wouldn't want the current state of my amp to necessarily decide what kind of speaker I would get.

  4. #4
    Forum Regular audio amateur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,523
    If you can get B&W 685 they are a good bet. They are the update to the DM602.
    Others will give you more options. Have you considered some stands for them?

  5. #5
    Forum Regular Kevio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    452
    From the OP, it looks like these are for nearfield use on a desktop so stands are unnecessary. The DM602 looks a bit big for desktop. You can use a smaller set of speaker and add a subwoofer and be very happy.

  6. #6
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    My desk is ~ 3.3 feet across and the distance to the wall it's against is 2.5 feet. Would these constraints still allow floorstand speakers to work? I'm reading that the 685 might have a deeper bass range, which would be a plus. But the cheapest price I see for them is 650$, which is quite a bit over budget.

  7. #7
    Forum Regular audio amateur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,523
    It really depends how you are going to be listening. Are these going to be on your desk?
    in that case the 685 are too big and the 686 would do nicely.

  8. #8
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    Oh, and another thought. I have a 24" monitor that takes up quite a bit of room on my desk. Even if I got some relatively small bookshelf speakers, it might be a squeeze to get them on my desk, or I'd have to put them partially behind the monitor. So consideration of floorstand speakers are still on the table..or off the table rather (sorry, couldn't resist..).

  9. #9
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    I guess I'm saying as long as the 3.5ft separation and 2.5ft max listening distance won't put me at a major listening disadvantage, I'm ok with keeping floorstand an option. The extra desk space would be a plus. Otherwise, I might be able to manage with something more like the 686 if nothing else makes sense.

  10. #10
    Retro Modernist 02audionoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,908
    In my computer setup, I wall-mounted the speakers to free up desk space. Another alternative is powered audio monitors, like this:

    http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_u...X5aDeluxe.html

    These aren 't likely a good candidate for wall-mounting, so that's a different topic. This eliminates the Beomaster. You could even upgrade to an M-Audio sound card.

  11. #11
    Forum Regular audio amateur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,523
    This is where you have to draw the line between powered studio monitors & hifi separates. In your situation a suggestion such as audionoobs would be more viable. It also negates the need for an amp, so you won't be using the B&O and you won't have to get another one down the line. I know Dynaudio makes some powered monitors aswell, but they may be a little more than 500.

  12. #12
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    That's an interesting idea getting powered studio monitors. That would also save me from having to get a DAC for plugging into an optical input sound card, right? I'm guessing these monitors can interface with a soundcard out-of-the-box, which would be excellent.

    My only question is, given a 2-speaker setup, how much quality am I compromising going with a powered studio monitor solution compared to something like the dm685s, or even the wharfedale 9.2's which are a bit cheaper? I like the simplicity of the studio monitor solution, but how would you honestly compare this with the hifi separates I could be getting within my budget range?

  13. #13
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    Here's something interesting. The BX8A deluxe is only 350$ with free shipping on amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0014ID03Q. This is a very tempting possibility. I'm still just interested in a quality comparison to other possibilities in my budget. I also recognize that these are studio monitors, so they're specifically designed for people that are mixing music and such. Would this make them any less enjoyable or less geared-for listening?

  14. #14
    Retro Modernist 02audionoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,908
    It seems to me you could say monitors tend toward high sonic accuracy and maybe a little less musicality than hifi speakers. That's a subjective listening thing, obviously. I suspect you'll get clarity, quality midrange, maybe less warmth than hifi speakers. These cards could be interesting, too...


    http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_u...phile2496.html

  15. #15
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    I'm trying to understand whether that soundcard would be required, or if I could plug it into my existing audigy zs card. There's TRS inputs in each monitor, so would I be supplied a cable that would go into one so I could put into into a standard soundcard "green wire" input, or would I need some converter, or would I actually need to get another soundcard? Sorry for the silly question, but I just couldn't find a clear explanation on the type of interface being used. Thanks for all the help audionoob.

  16. #16
    Retro Modernist 02audionoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,908
    Not a silly question at all. I was thinking in "upgrade" mode, not "required" mode. I can't see why you wouldn't be able to run the green output on the Audigy to the TRS input with an ordinary mini (3.5 mm plug) wire. Of course, you'd need an adapter from mini to 1/4", but those are super cheap.

    I'm no expert on this product, but now that you've asked the question, I think I'm finding they will not supply these wires or adapters with the monitors.

  17. #17
    Forum Regular audio amateur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,523
    Those BX8A seem to be a good deal for 350$. You should be able to hook them up to your soundcard with a 3.5mm to RCA cable. Get a decent one.

  18. #18
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    So, can we delve in a little deeper and say this would be my "best option" for a sub-500$ setup for computer audio, or is there any other ones I should consider before making a buy? Also, is there any big SQ boost I can get out of a soundcard upgrade above my audigy zs? I'm guessing that one would be more tailored to gaming compared to the m-audio card.

    I guess I should also think about what kind of cables to get. I've heard a lot that the quality of cable matters a lot...but I have no experience in testing the differences.

  19. #19
    Retro Modernist 02audionoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,908
    I know I'm not sure it's the best option, and also not sure it isn't. One option I'd consder if in your postion would be the NHT Classic Three on closeout prices and a simple amp like the AudioSource AMP 100:

    http://cgi.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/clt....388&clout&3&4&

    Edit: Oops...too expensive. I'll look for something else.

    OK...here we go...NHT Absolute Zero:

    http://cgi.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/clt....508&clout&3&4&

  20. #20
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    I'm seeing some nice reviews on NHT speakers, but my concern on the zeroes would be that they are said to have 'little to know bass'. If possible, I'm trying to make it without a subwoofer for awhile, which is why I was thinking of some 'big' bookshelf speakers like the bx8a that have decent bass. I'm still a bit conflicted over passive vs. active speaker options... if I was faced with an active solution and passive solution that were equal in SQ and price, I'd probably choose the active one just for space efficiency.

  21. #21
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,421
    Consider the NHT Classic twos. You should be able to find them for about $450pr. They have a warmer sound with good bass for their size. The Wharfedale diamond 9.2's and B&W 686's are a good choice as well.

    Also consider the Energy C-300 floor standers at http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=ENC300

    or these Boston floorstanders http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=BOCS226
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Luxman DA-06 DAC
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Dual Martin Logan Original Dynamo Subs
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

  22. #22
    Retro Modernist 02audionoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,908
    The bass issue with the Absolute Zero would be an issue, now that you mention it. Gaming sound effects could get lost. The M-Audio monitors you found on Amazon go down to 40 Hz and the Zero speakers go to only 68 Hz, according to the Audiogon ad.

  23. #23
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    So...my biggest challenge is having too many options...I become extremely indecisive. If anyone could help me narrow down my choices, or perhaps help develop criteria for narrowing them down, that would be really appreciated.

    I'm kind of leaning toward the m-audio BX8a delux paired with a 2496 soundcard. This full solution is only ~ 450$, and doesn't require an amp since its an active monitor. But I'd definitely be open to other setups that can get close to this price range, even if an amp is separate.

  24. #24
    Retro Modernist 02audionoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,908
    I would suggest assigning some simple levels of importance to the differences and see how they balance out. With the solution you currently favor...the M-Audio card and monitors...you get the claimed sonic accuracy of studio monitors, the simplicity of fewer pieces in that there's no separate amp, the bass extension and punch of the monitors without the sub, the simplicity of the connections - straight from the card to the monitors. With the bookshelf option, you get the wide range of speaker choices, the wide range of amp choices and the usually more musical sound of hifi speakers.

  25. #25
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13
    Ultimately, my goal is to get the best sounded setup that's as close to 500$ as possible (if an amp was needed, I might push that up a bit). I want it to sound as "musically appealing" as possible, which I realize is a very subjective term. With all else equal, I would of course prefer simplicity -- but I certainly wouldn't want simplicity to sacrifice musicality at all.

    If it's possible for me to get a reasonably priced amp, that might be a good start when considering bookshelf speaker options. Anyone have any suggestions there? But if I end up getting some really nice bookshelf speakers and there's only 100-200$ left for an amp, would I be getting something so poor that it makes the end product not worth it?

    I sometimes tend to overcomplicate/overanalyze things so thanks for bearing with me. Maybe if I was given what people think was the 'top choice' for a bookshelf/amp solution within my price range that would be really helpful instead of seeing 4 or 5 possibilities since I can get overwhelmed with indecisiveness.

    Thanks again for help.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •