Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    Suspended Joe_Carr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Omaha, NE USA
    Posts
    113

    Best materials for drivers

    I always wondered about this but what is the best type of material for tweeters? I noticed so far is silk dome tweeters been used most for studio monitors and home speakers but I wonder why? I always liked metal tweeters like titanium dome tweeters but seems like those aren't soo popular. My active monitors use silk dome tweeters with Neo magnets too. Well I guess there are Silk domes that use Ferrite magnets too. But my question is is silk tweeters the best for music, movies, games etc?


    For woofers is polypropylene good? My Samson monitors use them and I have seen alot of speakers use this for there woofers. Even Dynaudio speakers use these.

  2. #2
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,380
    personal preference

  3. #3
    Phila combat zone JoeE SP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,710
    The choice of cone or dome material is irrelevant. What matters is how a given cone or dome sounds.
    ARC SP9 MKIII, VPI HW19, Rega RB300
    Marcof PPA1, Shure, Sumiko, Ortofon carts, Yamaha DVD-S1800
    Behringer UCA222, Emotiva XDA-2, HiFimeDIY
    Accuphase T101, Teac V-7010, Nak ZX-7. LX-5, Behringer DSP1124P
    Front: Magnepan 1.7, DBX 223SX, 2 modified Dynaco MK3's, 2, 12" DIY TL subs (Pass El-Pipe-O) 2 bridged Crown XLS-402
    Rear/HT: Emotiva UMC200, Acoustat Model 1/SPW-1, Behringer CX2310, 2 Adcom GFA-545

  4. #4
    Oldest join date recoveryone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,435
    I am partial to the Linaeum tweeters
    HT
    Pioneer Elite SC lx502
    Pioneer Elite N50
    Pioneer Cassette CTM66R
    Pioneer Elite BDP 85FD

    Vizio P series 2160p
    Panamax 5300 EX

  5. #5
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    I like the ones made of raritanium.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  6. #6
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,380
    Quote Originally Posted by GMichael
    I like the ones made of raritanium.

    Mine are made from unobtanium

  7. #7
    I took a headstart... basite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mortsel, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Earth
    Posts
    3,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Hyfi
    Mine are made from unobtanium

    ooh yes, those surely beat the titanium ones...

    beats raritanium too...

    mine are made from enhanced Kryptonite, helps keeping superman away too...
    Life is music!

    Mcintosh MA6400 Integrated
    Double Advent speakers
    Thiel CS2.3's
    *DIY Lenco L75 TT
    * SME 3012 S2
    * Rega RB-301
    *Denon DL-103 in midas body
    *Denon DL-304
    *Graham slee elevator EXP & revelation
    *Lehmann audio black cube SE
    Marantz CD5001 OSE
    MIT AVt 2 IC's
    Sonic link Black earth IC's
    Siltech MXT New york IC's
    Kimber 4VS speakercable
    Furutech powercord and plugs.

    I'm a happy 20 year old...

  8. #8
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    Quote Originally Posted by Hyfi
    Mine are made from unobtanium
    I can never find those. It's like no one sells them.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  9. #9
    _ Luvin Da Blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    _
    Posts
    1,951
    Quote Originally Posted by basite
    ooh yes, those surely beat the titanium ones...

    beats raritanium too...

    mine are made from enhanced Kryptonite, helps keeping superman away too...

    You guys are just confusing the OP. Every one knows that tweeters made from the ear skin of a shrill bat make the very bestest tweets. They go way past the limits of even dog's hearing.
    Back in my day, we had nine planets.

  10. #10
    Mutant from table 9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,205
    I like the ones that taste like snozzberries.
    ______________________
    Joyce Summers: "You've got really great albums!"
    Rupert "Ripper" Giles: "Yeah... they're okay..."


    "Tha H-Dog listens easy, always has, always will." - Herbert Kornfeld (R.I.P.)

    "I lick the mothra moniters because they pump up the base!!" - Dusty Beiber

  11. #11
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    Quote Originally Posted by Luvin Da Blues
    You guys are just confusing the OP. Every one knows that tweeters made from the ear skin of a shrill bat make the very bestest tweets. They go way past the limits of even dog's hearing.
    I've never heard those.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  12. #12
    Forum Regular harley .guy07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Springfield, Mo
    Posts
    1,594
    I like byriltialumatonium tweeters in my system. Honestly joking aside the reason they use silk domes in most studio monitors is that they are near field monitors or they are used very close to you so the obvious choice would be to go with the smoother less bright sounding driver which silk tweeters for the most part are and that is also why i prefer them in my speakers. I like a more listenable smooth treble and not fatiguing.

    Marantz SR5008(HT)
    Nu Force P8 Preamp (2 channel)
    Pass Labs X150.5(2 channel)
    Adcom 545 mk2 power amp(rear channel amp)
    Spatial Audio M3 Turbo S Mains Speakers
    Dayton 8" HO custom sealed subwoofer(2 channel)
    Yamaha NS-c444 center channel
    Emotiva ERD-1 surround speakers
    JBL e250p subwoofer highly modified
    Samsung 46" LED TV
    OPPO BDP-83 blue ray/multi format player
    ps-audio NuWave dac (2 channel)
    Dell I660 music server running fidelizer windows 8 audio optimizer
    PS Audio Quintet power center



  13. #13
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    928
    Ribbon tweeters seem to be gaining popularity.

  14. #14
    _ Luvin Da Blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    _
    Posts
    1,951
    Quote Originally Posted by GMichael
    I've never heard those.
    Obviously, you're not a Golden Eared Bat then.
    Back in my day, we had nine planets.

  15. #15
    Suspended Joe_Carr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Omaha, NE USA
    Posts
    113
    I do see some monitors like the Samson Rubicon R5a - Active Ribbon Monitors that use Ribbon tweeters. I never really heard of these speakers but I would assume they sound good. But I wonder if silk dome tweeters are better since most monitors use silk dome tweeters.

  16. #16
    Suspended Smokey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Ozarks
    Posts
    3,959

  17. #17
    Forum Regular harley .guy07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Springfield, Mo
    Posts
    1,594
    I second reading this link it will explain things about all the tweeter designs to you and then you will be able to discern which one appeals to you best.

    Marantz SR5008(HT)
    Nu Force P8 Preamp (2 channel)
    Pass Labs X150.5(2 channel)
    Adcom 545 mk2 power amp(rear channel amp)
    Spatial Audio M3 Turbo S Mains Speakers
    Dayton 8" HO custom sealed subwoofer(2 channel)
    Yamaha NS-c444 center channel
    Emotiva ERD-1 surround speakers
    JBL e250p subwoofer highly modified
    Samsung 46" LED TV
    OPPO BDP-83 blue ray/multi format player
    ps-audio NuWave dac (2 channel)
    Dell I660 music server running fidelizer windows 8 audio optimizer
    PS Audio Quintet power center



  18. #18
    I took a headstart... basite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mortsel, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Earth
    Posts
    3,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe_Carr
    I do see some monitors like the Samson Rubicon R5a - Active Ribbon Monitors that use Ribbon tweeters. I never really heard of these speakers but I would assume they sound good. But I wonder if silk dome tweeters are better since most monitors use silk dome tweeters.
    in general: No.

    a good ribbon, with a good integration with cone mid&bass, will outperform a silk dome tweeter...

    A very important lesson in life: it's not because "most people/applications use them" that they are the best.

    silk domes are good, when correctly done, there are rubbish ones too, but they have a good price/performance ratio, whereas a Ribbon is generally more expensive, but can yield far better results.



    In general, it all depends on the design the manufacturer has got in mind. depending on other factors, they should choose for silk, alu, titanitum, beryllium, ... whatever, ribbons, coaxials, full ranges,..

    there is no real "best", with merely a material in mind. every manufacturer has it's theory on which material they use, and why they think it's the best. Other manufacturers, just take an idea from someone else, and try to replicate it.

    I also wonder on which studio monitors you're looking at, before stating "most use silk domes"...


    Keep them spinning,
    Bert.
    Life is music!

    Mcintosh MA6400 Integrated
    Double Advent speakers
    Thiel CS2.3's
    *DIY Lenco L75 TT
    * SME 3012 S2
    * Rega RB-301
    *Denon DL-103 in midas body
    *Denon DL-304
    *Graham slee elevator EXP & revelation
    *Lehmann audio black cube SE
    Marantz CD5001 OSE
    MIT AVt 2 IC's
    Sonic link Black earth IC's
    Siltech MXT New york IC's
    Kimber 4VS speakercable
    Furutech powercord and plugs.

    I'm a happy 20 year old...

  19. #19
    RGA
    RGA is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,539
    I would pay no attention to the drivers but the resulting sound of the speakers since it's the overall sound not the sound of the individual driver that matters. The best speakers I have heard under $10,000 is the Audio Note E and J speakers which is why I bought the latter. It uses a paper woofer (now a Hemp woofer) and silk dome tweeter with no ferro-fluid or any other liquid cooling. Nothing is intrinsically fancy about the design but the integration is as good as two way designs get - it sounds like a single driver but it has a full range sound.

    There are individual drivers that are superior - Plasma is impressive but you wind up paying $80,000 for a High Violoncello II and as terrific as it is it still doesn't integrate quite as well so you need a rather large listening room to sit far enough away for it to work bang on.

    Quad changed their site which is too bad because they had a nice article about the selection of materials for their boxed speakers where their goal was to have two drivers in their two way with very similar sonic signatures as the drivers themselves have a "sound" and this mixing two very different materials such as a paper or poly woofers and any kind of metal tweeter runs counter to cohesive sound. IMO they're right. This is also why I have liked ESL panels (not the hybrids) and certain Planars.

    But then comes efficiency - IMO the best amplifiers are Single Ended tube no or very low feedback varieties which often have low power. To me these amplifiers are several leagues above the better solid state amps including the no feedback class A SS amps out there that I have heard. Thus, for me if the speaker can't take advantage of what I consider the best front ends then even though the speaker is cohesive and has lots going for it, it won't make the cut for my long term music enjoyment.

    There is more to it than just looking at drivers. The fine sounding Quad 2905 which is one of the two best panels under $15k for example sounds quite nice in the midrange, is said to require high power or I should say powerful amplifiers. In theory it has a lot of things it should do better than most boxes - things like distortion because it has a much lighter diaphragm and is said by the Quad guys to therefore move faster. But as Ken Kessler of High Fi News measured it has much higher THD and IM distortion than comparably prices B&W floorstanders which use Kevlar and Metal tweeters. And the frequency response from 200hz to 20khz was +/- 6.6db and the pair matching was off by +/-5.9db. Distortion at 90db was 1.36% and this is arguably the best panel for sane money out there. And they sound good despite the numbers (Ken Kessler Hi-fi News October 2006 issue)

    And that's just it - despite the numbers and it also goes for the numbers on the individual drivers - there is a big dose of ART and "Listening" and the EAR involved over picking a driver out of a box and saying well this tweeter measures better than that tweeter and assuming that it will actually sound better. It might but then again it may sound much worse than a relatively unexciting measuring tweeter that is integrated with a woofer and cabinet properly.

  20. #20
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326
    With tweeters you have two overriding problems, dispersion and distortion. Your question about what the best material to make it from would depend on design of the speaker itself. But if we stick to dome type tweeters, the latest designs are using exotic materials like Beryllium and vapor deposition Diamond. These exotic materials have the highest strength to weight ratio of any materials used for dynamic tweeters and as such have the lowest distortion when compared to similar tweeters made with more common materials like silk and Aluminum.
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  21. #21
    I took a headstart... basite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mortsel, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Earth
    Posts
    3,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoffcin
    ... the latest designs are using exotic materials like Beryllium ...

    but Yamaha's NS-1000's had that in 1974 already

    but indeed, Beryllium is a "perfect" tweeter material, but there are others too!
    Life is music!

    Mcintosh MA6400 Integrated
    Double Advent speakers
    Thiel CS2.3's
    *DIY Lenco L75 TT
    * SME 3012 S2
    * Rega RB-301
    *Denon DL-103 in midas body
    *Denon DL-304
    *Graham slee elevator EXP & revelation
    *Lehmann audio black cube SE
    Marantz CD5001 OSE
    MIT AVt 2 IC's
    Sonic link Black earth IC's
    Siltech MXT New york IC's
    Kimber 4VS speakercable
    Furutech powercord and plugs.

    I'm a happy 20 year old...

  22. #22
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    538

    All structural metals essentially have the same specific stiffness

    Speciffic stiffness = E (Young's Modulus) / density.

    These materials are also isotropic which makes their response in a forced-response vibratory enviroment fairly straightforward to predict.

    Structures formed by a deposition process will invariably be orthotropic to a significant degree, and especially when one deposits a material like diamonds onto a substrate. The response of an orthotropic material in a forced-response vibratory enviroment is very complicated to predict.

  23. #23
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    124
    Berilium and Titanium tweeters are too bright to me. Silk is a good material but still no as realistic as a simbal sounds.. Aluminum is the best I have heard so far. Peerles,Vifa, etc.

  24. #24
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    58
    I guess, untill the techno gods bless us with something else,were stuck with the junk we have now. Oh,well I'm happy with my junk,they sound good to me......Especially the junk in my avatar.

  25. #25
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    538

    There is one tiny problem with Beryllium............

    Beryllium is toxic.

    Understatement Alert:

    The toxicity of Beryllium complicates the manufacturing process.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •