• 02-21-2009, 07:05 AM
    jaxwired
    38k but still not perfect.
    I find it humorous that the 38k pair of hansen speakers being reviewed by stereophile mag this month are still found to be worthy of criticism. This is their mid priced offering. LOL. Having heard a variety of hi end speakers and having been an audio hobbyist for 25 years, I thinks it's safe to say that speakers over the 15k mark are a total rip off.
    I'm not saying that they aren't great speakers. I'm sure they are sublime. However, I can get sublime speakers for 10k. Since 10k buys sound as good as 38k, 38k is a rip off no matter how excellent. If you've got the money and 38k is pretty much the same as 10k to you, then go for it. For the rest of us it is ridiculous.
  • 02-21-2009, 08:16 AM
    02audionoob
    It's a subjective matter. Some people might say they can get speakers for 3k that sound as good as speakers that cost 10k.
  • 02-21-2009, 09:07 AM
    jaxwired
    I agree that it is subjective. However, what you get for 10k compared to 3k can be seen in physical differences that can account for cost. Not true when comparing 10k to 50k speakers. There is zero justification for the price. The retail price is not correleated in any way to production costs. In speakers under 10k there does exist a correlation between retail price and production cost.
    Since there is no justification in material cost, how could a 50k pair possibly sound better than a 10k pair? A manufacturer can easily produce speakers using identical materials for 10k. Probably, significantly less.
  • 02-21-2009, 03:36 PM
    elapsed
    For the same money, Sonus Faber Stradivari Homage would be top of my list: http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/105sonus/

    That being said, they cost 10x my own speakers (which coincidentally have the same drivers), but I can at least see where some of this money has gone towards. Absolutely exquisite, these speakers are a work of art. But as you both said, this is a very subjective purchase (in both sound and aesthetics).

    cheers,
    elapsed
  • 02-21-2009, 09:46 PM
    JoeE SP9
    For that kind of money I could get some ML CLX's.
  • 02-21-2009, 09:51 PM
    elapsed
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JoeE SP9
    For that kind of money I could get some ML CLX's.

    Only 25K.. that gives you plenty of remaining budget for some huge monoblocks to drive these beasts. ;)

    cheers,
    elapsed
  • 02-21-2009, 09:57 PM
    02audionoob
    Anyone know where I could get a pair of Von Schweikert VR-11 online? Maybe accessories4less.com has a refurb pair?
  • 02-22-2009, 07:09 AM
    Kevio
    You guys are silly. Marketing people know you price a product based upon what you think you can get your market to pay for it. It doesn't have anything to do with what they cost you to build and in the realm of luxury goods it doesn't even need to have anything to do with what others are charging.

    And of course a manufacturer-friendly magazine like Sterophile is going to find problems if the solution to those problems is to upsell to a more expensive speaker from the same manufacturer.
  • 02-22-2009, 08:49 AM
    02audionoob
    People with lots of dough actually want to pay more for luxury goods, whether they consciously think about it or not. It's more exclusive that way. There woudn't necessarily be more cost to make a Louis Vuitton bag than a Coach bag, but look at the price difference.
  • 02-22-2009, 09:00 AM
    Ajani
    I'm not going to get into the debate about whether a $38K pair of speakers sounds better than a $10K pair.... that argument has been beaten to death, resurrected and killed again too many times on audio forums...

    However, what I do find interesting is the notion that a $38K speaker should have any real faults (ignoring reviewer preferences)... for that kind of money, the speaker should just be exceptional all around... Frankly for $10K I'd expect all around exceptional....
  • 02-22-2009, 09:25 AM
    basite
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by elapsed
    Only 25K.. that gives you plenty of remaining budget for some huge monoblocks to drive these beasts. ;)

    cheers,
    elapsed


    funny you say that, I just heard the 25 anniversary edition CLX's today...

    great speakers, and not really that hard to drive...
    well, no, not every amp will do, but they're far easier to drive than the CLS's before them, or many other speakers...


    article coming here on AR tomorrow or so :)

    Keep them spinning,
    Bert.
  • 02-22-2009, 10:03 AM
    JoeE SP9
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Kevio
    You guys are silly. Marketing people know you price a product based upon what you think you can get your market to pay for it. It doesn't have anything to do with what they cost you to build and in the realm of luxury goods it doesn't even need to have anything to do with what others are charging.

    And of course a manufacturer-friendly magazine like Sterophile is going to find problems if the solution to those problems is to upsell to a more expensive speaker from the same manufacturer.

    If the glossy mags were not manufacturer friendly would they get all that megabuck gear to test? I think not.
  • 02-22-2009, 11:00 AM
    hermanv
    There is close to zero volume discount for speakers selling in the $20K and up price range because the volume is tiny. Actual costs are much higher than you might suppose. My friend and I built two pairs of three way of our own where the objective was to match 20K or better speakers. Our raw costs were about $5K per pair with free labor

    For a three way 6 drivers easily run $1,200
    If the crossover uses silver coils and first class capacitors $2,000 isn't hard
    Cabinets and labor can easily reach $2,500
    Recover development costs ???

    All that totals $5,700. To pay the rent etc most companies need to double their costs so these would wholesale for $11,400. We need to add some for development, who knows how long, but a year is reasonable. Next the dealer and distributors add their mark-up and bingo $25,000 to $30,000.

    Expensive as all get out, but not a rip off and not gouging. Only you can decide if the sound improvement equals the additional cost increment since decent speakers can be had for closer to $3,500.
  • 02-22-2009, 11:16 AM
    Kevio
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JoeE SP9
    If the glossy mags were not manufacturer friendly would they get all that megabuck gear to test? I think not.

    Sure, but the principal driver for friendly relations has got to be the advertising revenue.
  • 02-22-2009, 12:54 PM
    Ajani
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by hermanv
    There is close to zero volume discount for speakers selling in the $20K and up price range because the volume is tiny. Actual costs are much higher than you might suppose. My friend and I built two pairs of three way of our own where the objective was to match 20K or better speakers. Our raw costs were about $5K per pair with free labor

    For a three way 6 drivers easily run $1,200
    If the crossover uses silver coils and first class capacitors $2,000 isn't hard
    Cabinets and labor can easily reach $2,500
    Recover development costs ???

    All that totals $5,700. To pay the rent etc most companies need to double their costs so these would wholesale for $11,400. We need to add some for development, who knows how long, but a year is reasonable. Next the dealer and distributors add their mark-up and bingo $25,000 to $30,000.

    Expensive as all get out, but not a rip off and not gouging. Only you can decide if the sound improvement equals the additional cost increment since decent speakers can be had for closer to $3,500.

    Well said :thumbsup:

    People always look at just raw material and possibly labour costs for speakers/equipment and not all the other expenses that go into producing mega-bucks Hi-Fi gear... Most products whether audio or otherwise are "overpriced" if you only consider labour and raw material (direct costs)... but when you add in all the overheads, selling and distribution expenses, normal profit margins etc etc etc... suddenly prices make a lot more sense... (though of course, there are some products that are plain rip-offs)...

    Whether, the difference in price between a $40K speaker and a $4K speaker is justified is solely up to the person writing the cheque!!!

    $3,500 is where I think you can get high-end speakers (not SOTA or absolute perfection)... I think you can get the next best thing from a mere $1K -$1.5K (Whether the tripling in price to get to high-end is worth it, is also up to the person writing the cheque).
  • 02-22-2009, 04:36 PM
    RGA
    I of course agree with HermanV and Ajani.

    First to the issue of perceived weaknesses - a Ferrari is WEAK when it comes to creature comforts, amenities, and comfort compared to a Bentley. The Bentley is weak compared to a Ferrari where high speed and high speed handling is concerned. But they're both better than a Ford anything.

    The design of the loudspeaker may or may not appeal to your ear period - but there are plenty of $35k+ loudspeakers on the market and perhaps one of them will do it for you.

    Secondly, as the others have noted costs just are not the same with small production loudspeakers that are hand built versus stuff stamped out of an assembly line using the cheapest parts available at a marketing department's and accounting departments demand that X part must cost .005 cents each rather than what is the best part - use it and then price the thing accordingly.

    Price and value is determined by the individual. If you hear a $50k loudspeaker that brings you to a catharsis when you listen and the $10k one does not then despite the measurements of how many drivers or types of drivers and box or no box etc then $50k is money well spent and $10k is not. The reverse may be true. I have only heard one loudspeaker under $10k that I would buy over my loudspeaker and it's from the same maker. Another person may like a speaker at $1k more than my speaker and view mine as overpriced and "insane" for that kind of money. So be it - you can't please all the people all the time...
  • 02-22-2009, 05:02 PM
    JoeE SP9
    I guess you haven't seen or heard of the Bently Continental Flying Spur.

    0 to 60 mph in 4.6 sec Top speed 195 mph.

    Very fast with all the luxury and comfort anyone could want in a 4 door sedan.
  • 02-22-2009, 10:50 PM
    RGA
    Yeah I figured someone would mention it - hopefully however the point was not lost. Perhaps I should have said Bugatti
  • 02-23-2009, 02:38 AM
    audio amateur
    No a Bugatti goes even faster. 250+mph for their latest model :p
  • 02-23-2009, 12:17 PM
    JoeE SP9
    It has 2 doors and 2 seats. I presume you mean the Veyron.
  • 02-23-2009, 12:37 PM
    Feanor
    Oh yeah!
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JoeE SP9
    It has 2 doors and 2 seats. I presume you mean the Veyron.

    The Veyron. Now there's true excess.
    ...
    http://ca.geocities.com/w_d_bailey/B....4-montage.jpg
  • 02-23-2009, 12:59 PM
    JoeE SP9
    You have to admit it is kind of homely looking.
  • 02-23-2009, 01:42 PM
    basite
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JoeE SP9
    You have to admit it is kind of homely looking.



    I actually like it, It's a beast. It might not be as slim as other exotic cars, but where else would they house all that power?

    It's amazing in a Wilson Audio Alexandria sort of way :p

    Keep them spinning,
    Bert.
  • 02-23-2009, 02:18 PM
    JoeE SP9
    Most Wilsons are kind of homely also.
  • 02-23-2009, 04:03 PM
    audio amateur
    That wasn't necessary Feanor:cryin:. I'm finding it difficult enough not having the possibility to drive while at university here
    Keep it to audio please ;)