Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Meh. Brett A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    North-Central MA
    Posts
    158

    Question Vibration difference between MDF and Melamine particle board?

    So, I've realized the inch-an-a-quarter slabs I've had under my equipment (including my TT) to absorb vibration are actually something that HD sells as "Melamine" which isn't MFD like I thought it was. It seems to have a lower fiber density and is covered with some sort of Formica laminate.
    I cut my pieces from an old school desk top (like a big metal-based teacher's desk).

    Any idea if this stuff functions well as a vibration absorber, or should I replace it with real MDF?
    Amp Shanling A3000-> speakers Vienna Acoustic Mozart Grand CD Rotel RCD 991 AE TT: Well Tempered Record Player-> AT OC9MLII -> Jolida JD9. cables from AQ, Siltech, Bogdan, Signal DH Labs, etc...
    Some pictures of it all

  2. #2
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Vibration absorption is about mass and density - I would use the denser, heavier material to that end.

    Melamine is usually the plastic resin part, very hard, that is the "laminate" part of the board itself. A softer particle board, and sometimes MDF is the material in which melamine gets bonded too. Home Depot and the like call the particle board stuff Melamine a lot but it can be pretty confusing trying to decipher what a person means when they are interchaning the nomenclature.

    If you've got the particleboard substrate material, then yeah, MDF will be marginally better at absorbing vibrations. Will you notice a difference in sound? Arguable. If you've got a router or jig saw and some scrap MDF, it's a cheap enough experiment.

    There shouldn't be melamine and formica on the same board.

  3. #3
    Meh. Brett A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    North-Central MA
    Posts
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by kexodusc
    Vibration absorption is about mass and density - I would use the denser, heavier material to that end.

    Melamine is usually the plastic resin part, very hard, that is the "laminate" part of the board itself. A softer particle board, and sometimes MDF is the material in which melamine gets bonded too. Home Depot and the like call the particle board stuff Melamine a lot but it can be pretty confusing trying to decipher what a person means when they are interchaning the nomenclature.

    If you've got the particleboard substrate material, then yeah, MDF will be marginally better at absorbing vibrations. Will you notice a difference in sound? Arguable. If you've got a router or jig saw and some scrap MDF, it's a cheap enough experiment.

    There shouldn't be melamine and formica on the same board.
    Thanks, this is just the info I'm looking for. I agree, calling the board itself melamine is confusing, but that is what HD is doing. I know melamine is a chemical polymer-and I believe the stuff that was turning up in pet food from China last year. Regardless, the stuff you describe is the stuff I have.

    Since I seem to have a constant need to tweak (esp. cheaply), I'll replace it with the denser, non-laminated MDF at some point.

    Thanks again ---Brett
    Amp Shanling A3000-> speakers Vienna Acoustic Mozart Grand CD Rotel RCD 991 AE TT: Well Tempered Record Player-> AT OC9MLII -> Jolida JD9. cables from AQ, Siltech, Bogdan, Signal DH Labs, etc...
    Some pictures of it all

  4. #4
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127

    Mdf

    Quote Originally Posted by Brett A
    Thanks, this is just the info I'm looking for. I agree, calling the board itself melamine is confusing, but that is what HD is doing. I know melamine is a chemical polymer-and I believe the stuff that was turning up in pet food from China last year. Regardless, the stuff you describe is the stuff I have.

    Since I seem to have a constant need to tweak (esp. cheaply), I'll replace it with the denser, non-laminated MDF at some point.

    Thanks again ---Brett
    In addition to being low resonance and cheap, MDF cuts cleanly and precisely with power tools and is a lot easier on their cutting edges than Melamine laminate. Of course you might want to veneer the surfaces for best appearances.

  5. #5
    Meh. Brett A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    North-Central MA
    Posts
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanor
    In addition to being low resonance and cheap, MDF cuts cleanly and precisely with power tools and is a lot easier on their cutting edges than Melamine laminate. Of course you might want to veneer the surfaces for best appearances.
    Thanks. I've worked with some un-laminated MDF already and found it pretty buttery through the table saw in the shop at work. I have yet to finish any though and am thinking of two possibilities.
    • Spray polyurethane (several coats) then butcher's wax
    • Spray paint: gray primer then semi-flat black

    I'll have to see how it takes either of these finishes. i know it can be quite absorbent and easily ruined when it comes to exposure to water.
    Amp Shanling A3000-> speakers Vienna Acoustic Mozart Grand CD Rotel RCD 991 AE TT: Well Tempered Record Player-> AT OC9MLII -> Jolida JD9. cables from AQ, Siltech, Bogdan, Signal DH Labs, etc...
    Some pictures of it all

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •