Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15

    Definite beginner question..

    I know for a lot of you guys, this is something you would probably just totally ignore because it may be annoying but I am really just getting into having a somewhat decent set up (hopefully). Anyways, I'm getting a Marantz 2200 receiver which is 15 watts at 8 ohms (i believe) and I have absolutely NO idea where to start with speakers. Obviously I know 15 watts isn't going to be knocking down the walls but I don't want to buy a speaker set up that is overkill or won't be able to be powered by the 15 watts..
    Yes I know choosing speakers depends soley on my taste, but I don't even know where to start looking even because I don't even know how to start matching things up. Such as should I only be looking at speakers with say, a 50 watt max or what. I apologize for coming in here with absolute cluelessness and I know all you guys are audiophiles, and I am extremely jealous, but I guess I need to start somewhere. so if you can steer me in the right direction AT ALL, I would truly appreciate it.
    thanks.

  2. #2
    Color me gone... Resident Loser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Nueva Jork
    Posts
    2,148

    You...

    ...would be surprised at what 15Wpc can do...with the right speakers, your average power levels for a reasonable SPL (Sound Pressure Level) will probably be around one or two Watts...I'll leave it to others to suggest specifics; consider the following just general guidelines.

    You will need to look for speakers rated @ 8 Ohms nominal impedance...anything less may squeeze marginally more power out of your Marantz, but it may also tax it beyond is comfort zone...I can find no specs into a four-Ohm load.

    You will want loudspeakers with a high sensitivity as they will be more efficient at using those 15 Watts...that would mean the speakers would need to be ported or horn loaded as opposed to of a sealed (acoustic suspension) design...

    Generally speaking, such loudspeakers will likely be a bit bass shy, but...not to worry. Once you review the specs of likely candidates and audition those possibilities, should you need a bit more bottom-end, you can always purchase a powered subwoofer. Even tho' your receiver is of late '70s vintage and does not have a "sub out" jack, there are subs that allow for various hookup options...and all of this is really dependent on you musical tatses, etc. If you listen to chamber music, two bookshelf units may be all you need...however, if you're into "death metal" or even classical sonic blockbusters some additional bottom-end will probably be required...

    Just my two-cents...

    jimHJJ(...I used to be an audiophile but now I know better...)
    Hello, I'm a misanthrope...don't ask me why, just take a good look around.

    "Men would rather believe than know" -Sociobiology: The New Synthesis by Edward O. Wilson

    "The great masses of the people...will more easily fall victims to a great lie than to a small one" -Adolph Hitler

    "We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves" -Goethe

    If you repeat a lie often enough, some will believe it to be the truth...

  3. #3
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659
    When looking for speakers for a low powered unit such as that, the speaker's max power is meaningless. What you should be concerned with is the "sensitivity rating". or how much sound can be produced with as little power as possible.

    This specified in decibels (sound output) per watt of power fed them, such as 90 db/watt.

    In that case, for one watt fed, that speaker will produce 90 db of sound (there's more involved but this is the basic idea).

    The higher the db number, the more efficient a speaker is. This directly relates to how well you use the power in your receiver. For every three db increase in that figure, you need one half the power, or one half watt of the initial figure. Likewise, for every three db decrease, you need twice the power, or two watts.

    So., using that 90db/watt figure as a starting point, to reach the same loudness level for a speaker with a rating of 93 db, you need one half of a watt. For a speaker with a rating of 87 db/watt, you need two watts.

    In your case, I'd be looking at speakers with a sensitivity rating as high as possible, but don't throw sound quality out of the equation. An efficient speaker that sounds awful is less preferable than one that's a little less efficient that sounds good.

    Generally, all else being equal, a larger speaker will be more efficient than a smaller speaker.

    But, one caution. You can destroy a speaker by trying to push your low powered amp too hard. Thst forces it into a form of distortion which can destroy a speaker.

    This can be prevented with a little common sense. If your system starts to sound funky, distorted or simply not right, turn it down now. Something is complaining.

    Are you looking new? What's your price range?
    Last edited by markw; 05-01-2007 at 06:29 AM.

  4. #4
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127

    What to look for

    Quote Originally Posted by travelight
    I know for a lot of you guys, this is something you would probably just totally ignore because it may be annoying but I am really just getting into having a somewhat decent set up (hopefully). Anyways, I'm getting a Marantz 2200 receiver which is 15 watts at 8 ohms (i believe) and I have absolutely NO idea where to start with speakers. ....
    15 watts isn't a huge amount of power but will drive efficient speakers even in a mid-sized room. Efficiency can be gauged by the sensitivity specification of the speakers; this is usually measured as decibels per watt at one meter. That is, for example 92 dB/1 watt @ 1 meter; the higher the number the more efficient the speaker. By the way, the "maximum watts" rating is perhaps the most often quoted speaker specification, however it is also the most irrelevant for the home user.

    Of course, the size of your room and also its furnishings are a big factor as well as the speaker efficiency. But in a typical medium sized room, say 12' x 20', 15 watts will drive speakers with a sensitivity of 92+ dB quite well.

  5. #5
    If you can't run-walk. Bernd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    1,602

    Welcome

    Some good points here for you from the guys. Not much I can add really. 15 watts into a sensitive speaker will work fine. Just one more point to consider. If you get really sensitive speakers i.e.100db and above you have to be sure that your system downstream is very quiet. As speakers that sensitive will pick up all and any noise you feed them.
    Good luck and have fun.
    Just for starters take a look at Zingali speakers. Very easy to drive and high quality.

    Peace

    "Let The Earth Bear Witness."

  6. #6
    I took a headstart... basite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mortsel, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Earth
    Posts
    3,056
    or klipsch...

    the marantz's 15 watts are not much, but it will actually output them, and then (with the right speakers) 15 watts are enough watts.

    so, try klipsch, or the zingalis, or even monitor audio (the silver series)...
    Life is music!

    Mcintosh MA6400 Integrated
    Double Advent speakers
    Thiel CS2.3's
    *DIY Lenco L75 TT
    * SME 3012 S2
    * Rega RB-301
    *Denon DL-103 in midas body
    *Denon DL-304
    *Graham slee elevator EXP & revelation
    *Lehmann audio black cube SE
    Marantz CD5001 OSE
    MIT AVt 2 IC's
    Sonic link Black earth IC's
    Siltech MXT New york IC's
    Kimber 4VS speakercable
    Furutech powercord and plugs.

    I'm a happy 20 year old...

  7. #7
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15
    I really appreciate all the information you guys have given me. Now at least I have an idea for what to look for when I start searching! I am planning on probably just getting a used set of speakers because I got the receiver for a very low price and I figured I'll try and keep the whole set up as cost effective as possible. Again, thanks for helping to steer me in the right direction!

    Also, since the receiver is at 8 ohms, does that mean it is necessary for the speaker to be at 8 ohms also, or can a 6 ohm speaker be used in its place. I assume it would be less efficient or not sound as good, I just wanted to find out though.
    Last edited by travelight; 05-01-2007 at 08:29 AM.

  8. #8
    I took a headstart... basite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mortsel, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Earth
    Posts
    3,056
    i think it's best to try to find 8 ohm speakers, this will put less stress on your amp 6 ohm should work fine too, but 4 ohm might be too much sometimes, especially when you use floorstanders. the Zingalis are exellent speakers, but they are quite expensive...

    Good luck,
    Bert.
    Life is music!

    Mcintosh MA6400 Integrated
    Double Advent speakers
    Thiel CS2.3's
    *DIY Lenco L75 TT
    * SME 3012 S2
    * Rega RB-301
    *Denon DL-103 in midas body
    *Denon DL-304
    *Graham slee elevator EXP & revelation
    *Lehmann audio black cube SE
    Marantz CD5001 OSE
    MIT AVt 2 IC's
    Sonic link Black earth IC's
    Siltech MXT New york IC's
    Kimber 4VS speakercable
    Furutech powercord and plugs.

    I'm a happy 20 year old...

  9. #9
    Crank it up, dude! huh? hydroman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Chesapeake Beach MD
    Posts
    212
    A good/cheap/efficent speaker on Ebay[tm] might be Cerwin Vegas. Give us a budget - i am sure someone has time on their hands and would search Ebay[tm] for you to give you some suggestions. Check your local newspaper as well - shipping will be expensive...
    H/K AVR635 7.1
    Denon DVD900
    AE AEGIS III Mains
    ION USB Turntable w/ Shure M97XE
    15" Titanic III Sealed Enclosure Sub
    Dayton Rackmount 1000W :O
    Denon Surrounds
    Sony Bravia KDL40S2000

  10. #10
    rockin' the mid-fi audio_dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    ottawa, ontario
    Posts
    1,018
    uhg...cerwin-vega?? yuck...

    party speakers? yeah... nice hi-fi speakers? better look elsewhere.

    their volume/buck ratio is HUGE, but sound...well. i won't go there.
    _________________________________________________
    Jeeze... people still use sigs?!

  11. #11
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    Mark down another vote for Klipsch. They work well for the budget minded and would match good with a Marantz. Bright speakers + warm amp = nice sound.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  12. #12
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15
    I just picked it up today, and to my surprise, it was a 2220, not a 2200. So I have 20 watts to work with now instead of 15! Anyways, my budget is pretty much as little as possible, so I was just planning on trolling all the audio shops around here that have used gear, rather than paying a boat load to get a set shipped. It sounds like a lot of you guys agree on Klipsch, so I'll start searching around and testing some out. I doubt it matters too much, but I'll be playing exclusively records with it because i got a great deal on a marantz 6100 TT also .

  13. #13
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659
    Are you interested in a pair of good, used, 92 db/watt, towers for $130 + shipping from a reputable dealer?

    http://www.athenaspeakers.com/v2/cla...hp?ident=AS-F1

  14. #14
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15
    thanks for the offer, I looked them up and they seem to be well reviewed, but I noticed they weighed 41 pounds each, and i think shipping 82 pounds would probably cost more than the speakers themselves. thanks though, I appreciate it!

  15. #15
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,421
    Those vintage low watt receivers could really put out the sound. My first receiver was a 1970s pioneer rated at 15wpc and it handled a variety of speakers without any problems. Back then the amplifiers and power supplies were made to higher standards then the low end crap today. Hell, I would put my 1976 vintage technics 40wpc integrated amp up against most of the low end junk from pioneer,yamaha and the like today.

    I think you'll find that that Marantz will drive most speakers with a S/N of 90 without any problems.
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Luxman DA-06 DAC
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Dual Martin Logan Original Dynamo Subs
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •