Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    10

    Which Mp3 player ?

    Which MP3 player would you recommend.

    Ipod Shuffel 1gb
    SanDisk SDMX1 1gb
    Samsung yp-mt6z 1gb

    They are similar in price, features wise the Apple seems to be lacking.

    Between the Sam and Sand, the only negative is the Sam isn't Mac
    compatible.

    Your thoughts

  2. #2
    Suspended topspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,717
    I s'pose it depends on what you want to do with it. I use the Shuffle for trips to the gym and it's perfect for that. For me, I could care less about the ability to see what song is playing, but for other's this is an important feature.

    I went with the Shuffle for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the price. I also liked that the interface seemed was very intuitive (important for those of us that are pretty inept on a computer), there are far more peripherals for iPods than any other player, and the Apple AAC format sounds much better as a compressed format than MP3, which to me sounds like the music is underwater in 128 encryption. My friend had the Sammy and after he heard my shuffle, sold it and bought a 20g iPod. The SQ on the Sammy is simply horrid. I haven't heard of the SanDisck so I won't comment.

    Hope this helps.

  3. #3
    AR Newbie Registered Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ft.Bragg,Ca.
    Posts
    4
    Check out Perception Digital PD-1000 1.5G HDD Jukebox,MP3,WMA
    w/voice recording.USB 2.0 interface for fast drag and drop transfer,also
    has line in recording jack.Built in equalizer,9 play back modes and for a great price,I've been using one for 3 months without any problems.

  4. #4
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    102

    take a look at the Rio Carbon..

    the best all-around mp3 player on the market in my opinion. It splits the difference between bulkier juke box players and solid state players. It's a UMS device and will show up as an external drive in pc's and Mac's. Audible compatible, 5 GB's (~4.6 useable), great sound quality (better than my 2g iPod), bookmarking, voice recording, amazing battery life, iTunes compatible, high quality fit and finish and very durable. Not one skip or any damage after 8-9 months of hard use. The form factor is perfect for portable use and about the size of a credit card albeit a little thicker. It will cost a little more than the Shuffle for example but not by much. It can be had for about 170 if you look around.

  5. #5
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    sacramento (carmichael) CA
    Posts
    42
    the i-river hardware often gets top reviews for sound quality. they come in a lot of sizes. you might look into their stuff.

  6. #6
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    10
    OK some of my criteria,

    I didn't want a Hard drive so that eliminates a lot of the high storage
    units, from what I found 1g is about as high as you can go without
    getting into a HD.

    Also, the price range of the 3 I mentioned is compatible, around
    140-160 ish.

    Sound quality is definately a concern, the comment about the
    Shuffle vs others, ? can you play some of these others in
    different modes (compressions) ? that will improve the quality ?

  7. #7
    Suspended topspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,717
    Quote Originally Posted by cowboy
    Sound quality is definately a concern, the comment about the
    Shuffle vs others, ? can you play some of these others in
    different modes (compressions) ? that will improve the quality ?
    Technically, increasing your bitrate will improve the sound. However, you now have chewed up a lot more storage space and can't load as many tunes. Being an audiophile, I was terribly concerned about sound quality and had pretty much resigned myself to burn everything at near lossless compression rates. A friend suggested using the default (128) rate and if I didn't like it, I could always burn it again at a higher rate. Well, aside from all my posturing about how important sq is, I've found 128 to quite adequate for my usage. The music doesn't sound like it's underwater, there's no warbling, and I've burned 4 complete discs onto the 512 Shuffle and have used less than 1/3 of the available storage. One thing I've found to be incredibly stupid is the arm band Apple sells for the shuffle. Why in the world did they make it white! I guess they expect people to not sweat when they are wearing it at oh, say the gym. Talk about putting form before function.

  8. #8
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    10
    Anyone have any #'s on the percentages of compression ?

    Mp3, wav, floc etc vs Full .

    And what the cut off is. I heard one of these usse about 60%
    still high, but that you can't distinguish the sound difference ?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Thinking about a CD player upgrade.
    By jamison in forum Digital Domain & Computer Audio
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-18-2005, 01:06 PM
  2. Sonic differences between a Toshibsa SD-2700 DVD player and a dedicated CD player
    By edlchiang62 in forum Digital Domain & Computer Audio
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-28-2005, 03:41 PM
  3. Cd player and Laser disc player...need advice
    By stewartchiang in forum General Audio
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-16-2004, 08:03 AM
  4. How to make your DVD player your best source....
    By maxg in forum General Audio
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-18-2004, 01:08 AM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-05-2004, 02:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •