Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Crackhead Extraordinaire Dusty Chalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    below the noise floor
    Posts
    3,636

    Hey FA (and other Jeff Wayne fans)

    Did you see what's being re-released on Tuesday?



    On SACD no less. Too bad I can't afford the above special edition, but I will be getting the regular one.
    Eschew fascism.
    Truth Will Out.
    Quote Originally Posted by stevef22
    you guys are crackheads.
    I remain,
    Peter aka Dusty Chalk

  2. #2
    Musicaholic Forums Moderator ForeverAutumn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,769
    Very cool. Thanks for letting me know Dusty. I just got back from seeing the movie. I'd give it (the movie) 2.5 out of 5. It was okay. Some good effects and interesting camera angles. Great use of sound to build suspense. But, all in all, if you're into this kind of movie, Signs was waaaaay better.

    If you are planning on seeing this, do it while it's still in the theatre. It'll suck at home...unless you've got a really good home theatre set-up.

  3. #3
    Forum Regular BarryL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    1,085

    Ooohhhhlllaaaaaa

    Quote Originally Posted by Dusty Chalk
    Did you see what's being re-released on Tuesday?



    On SACD no less. Too bad I can't afford the above special edition, but I will be getting the regular one.

    Did you ever hear his follow-up to this: Spartacus.

    I didn't even know he had done a follow-up. Perhaps it was never released in North America. I'd be interested in hearing it.

  4. #4
    Forum Regular BarryL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    1,085

    How was...

    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverAutumn
    Great use of sound to build suspense.

    How was the John Williams soundtrack? Would it stand alone as a soundtrack without the visuals?

  5. #5
    Musicaholic Forums Moderator ForeverAutumn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,769
    Quote Originally Posted by BarryL
    How was the John Williams soundtrack? Would it stand alone as a soundtrack without the visuals?
    The soundtrack was great for building suspense, but I don't think it would stand up on it's own. I was more focused on the visuals and the sound provided more of a backdrop. But it didn't really seem to be music. It was more along the lines of the Jaws theme. It was kind of monotone but you knew that it was building up to something.

  6. #6
    Close 'n PlayŽ user Troy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Highway 6, between Tonopah and Ely
    Posts
    2,318
    I heard a cut from that WOTW album on the radio this week. Sounded like Moody Blues interspersed with overly dramatic Richard Burton naration.

    The DJ said that it was the "justin Heyward track", but what's the rest of the disc like?

  7. #7
    Crackhead Extraordinaire Dusty Chalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    below the noise floor
    Posts
    3,636
    Quote Originally Posted by Troy
    I heard a cut from that WOTW album on the radio this week. Sounded like Moody Blues interspersed with overly dramatic Richard Burton naration.

    The DJ said that it was the "justin Heyward track", but what's the rest of the disc like?
    Well, the rest is like the music with the overly dramatic Richard Burton narration and with other singers. Lots of story-telling interspersed with songs. Phil Lynott, Julie Covington, David Essex, amongst others. Really great cast. Compelling listening.

    In other words, if the Richard Burton narration was a turn-off, stay far far away from this. But to people like me, ...well, let's put it this way, Patrick Stewart can learn things from Burton, and I like Patrick Stewart.
    Eschew fascism.
    Truth Will Out.
    Quote Originally Posted by stevef22
    you guys are crackheads.
    I remain,
    Peter aka Dusty Chalk

  8. #8
    Suspended 3-LockBox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Hey! Over here!
    Posts
    2,746

    I'm shocked!

    Quote Originally Posted by Troy
    I heard a cut from that WOTW album on the radio this week. Sounded like Moody Blues interspersed with overly dramatic Richard Burton naration.

    The DJ said that it was the "justin Heyward track", but what's the rest of the disc like?
    I cannot believe that you (of all people) haven't heard or own this CD already.

    But your initial impressions of the music are pretty right-on. I heard this for the first time 20 years ago so it was kinda cool at the time, but it doesn't hold up to any real scrutiny. I suggest someone burn you a copy of it before plopping down any serious cash for the re-release. I am however curious to know if there is any real improvement in sound quality, since the CD was in need of an overhaul 'mastering wise', IMO.

    MY puter is still fritzed or I'd offer (I'm using the public library until mine's fixed or replaced).

  9. #9
    C-Z
    C-Z is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    53
    I was peeking at this last week. If I do it, it'll surely be the SACD one, especially if there is a CD layer on it so I can make a CDR for my cartunes. Unless it is way too many $$$$ - what do they want for it?

    The music and naration may be dated or over the top or whatever for someone listening for the first time, but I don't care cause this one brings back great memories for me. My brother made me a cassette when it first came out, and it was in my car player every road trip for years.

    I'm ignorant - what else has Jeff Wayne done?

    FA - I also really liked Signs, and the DVD soundtrack remains one of the best sounding ones I have ever heard. This includes great, not over the top effects that put you right in the scenes and add tremendously. Like the dogs barking, followed by the wind rustling the corn in the opening section, etc...

  10. #10
    Musicaholic Forums Moderator ForeverAutumn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,769
    Quote Originally Posted by C-Z
    FA - I also really liked Signs, and the DVD soundtrack remains one of the best sounding ones I have ever heard. This includes great, not over the top effects that put you right in the scenes and add tremendously. Like the dogs barking, followed by the wind rustling the corn in the opening section, etc...
    I can't say that I noticed Signs having a very interesting soundtrack either. Thanks for the tip. For me, what made Signs great was that one scene in the basement where the only light was the flashlight. Brilliant! Probably my favourite movie scene ever.

  11. #11
    Crackhead Extraordinaire Dusty Chalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    below the noise floor
    Posts
    3,636
    Unholy carp, seven disks? I have to get this.
    Eschew fascism.
    Truth Will Out.
    Quote Originally Posted by stevef22
    you guys are crackheads.
    I remain,
    Peter aka Dusty Chalk

  12. #12
    Suspended 3-LockBox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Hey! Over here!
    Posts
    2,746

    I liked it a lot.

    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverAutumn
    Very cool. Thanks for letting me know Dusty. I just got back from seeing the movie. I'd give it (the movie) 2.5 out of 5. It was okay. Some good effects and interesting camera angles. Great use of sound to build suspense. But, all in all, if you're into this kind of movie, Signs was waaaaay better.

    If you are planning on seeing this, do it while it's still in the theatre. It'll suck at home...unless you've got a really good home theatre set-up.
    Certainly, 'Signs' did a more clever job of creating menace with very few special effects, particularly the basement scene, but I found WOTW to be a very involving movie even though I know the story backwards and forwards. This movie had way more heart and soul than did its 'clone', Independance Day, which was downright dopey in places, and was inappropriately lighthearted throughout.

    My only beef with the new WOTW, is why Speilberg found the need to change the beginning story line to suggest that the machines had been planted here eons ago, but never went any farther than the suggestion...WTF? It was an unnecessary, underdeveloped and useless plot devise. Otherwise, it was an appropriately dark movie and well done.

    And did anyone notice Gene Berry from the '50s version toward the end? I did.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •