Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 29
  1. #1
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025

    Pioneer Receivers: VSX-1015TX vs. Elite VSX-52TX

    Okay Pioneer lovers, I need your help. Long story short, there's an extremely good chance I'll be buying a new receiver in a week or two...
    These two units have definitely caught my attention, and curiousity is getting the better of me. But what the hell is the difference between them aside from the cosmetics and a few goofy space age RS-232C connections that I won't ever use?

    Is there anything notoriously better about the Elite receiver over the 1015TX unit? Are they infact the same chassis, platform, and componentry throughout? Salesperson was very nice, and I trust him, told me there's about a $150 difference between the units, but doesn't really know much more than. Just assumes that because "Elite" is on the front, it's better.

    I'm not so sure....they're both built in Malaysia...same assembly line? Is that at all like those parallel Yamaha and Denon product lines?

    Anyone know?

  2. #2
    AR Regular evil__betty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Great White North
    Posts
    164
    kexodusc,

    There is absolutly nothing different between the two with the exception that the Elite is shiny black, instead of a flat black, it says 'Elite' on it, it has a 8 channel input instead of 7 channel. The processor in both are identical, but one thing the 1015 has is that there are 3 component inputs and one out as opposed to 2 in, one out on the Elite. Oh yeah, the Elite has a 3 year warranty as opoosed to only a one year on the 1015. And, don't forget about the almost $400 (CAN) price difference.

    Thats one of the reasons I bought the 1015 for myself - the other reason is that I couldn't afford the new Onkyo 803 right now. The unit kicks ass. Save the money, and get the 1015.

    Cheers

  3. #3
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    geez, is it $400 cdn difference?

    I'd be buying it back in the US and bringing it home duty/tax free. That saves a bit. Must be a larger markup on the Elite too.

    This is what I was lead to believe. That the older 1014TX and 52TX were 95% identical, and that the 1015TX was the "updated" version of the 1014TX.

    That's aweful tempting. We'll see what happens.

  4. #4
    low on funds high on hope
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    south of reality
    Posts
    90
    i went in to compare the 815 and 1015 at bb and they had an 815 open box from a upgrade that was bought only 3 days before and i got it for only $200. It has alot more overhead than i expected and im pretty satisfied with the purchase and dont know of any reasons why i would have liked the 1015 more (in my case i dont benefit from video switching. bc i have a hdmi on my dvd player/tv). basically 90% of the features are the same. the front optical already got some use when a friend brought over his x-box...he thought i had a flagship receiver b/c he had never seen an optical in front before. all the setup went well. the auto setup worked pretty well other than setting fronts to large and i made some changes on the midbass. the only thing that is bothering me about this unit is the main display. it shows in large letters the input sources (ie dvd/ld) and the volume in very small. what i like is for the scheme (ie dts es, or advanced game) to be shown instead and for the volume to flash large when adjusting and then hide.

    Anybody know how to switch the display??/i cant find it in the manual.. basically i am happy trading off the $300 for the 815 over the 1015.....worked great in my situation at least.
    spl or die.

  5. #5
    Indifferentist Slosh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    2,221
    Also try to see if you can find the VSX 9300 or VSX 9100.

    The 9300 is the same as the Elite 56 minus the i-Link. The 9100 is the same as the Elite 52. Vanns and a few other places were selling the 9300 for $700! You may get lucky and still find one at that price.
    Originally Posted by Troy: She has that same kind of cleft-pallet, slightly retarded way of singing that so many other people find endearing.


  6. #6
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Thanks Slosh. Hadn't heard of either model until you mentioned them. Hard to find much info on them, Pioneer doesn't even have them on their site.
    I'll keep an eye out though.

  7. #7
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    dallas, tx
    Posts
    33

    Always opt for the ELITE

    Pioneer Elites are always a better value than the normals.

    I have been a pioneer fan for a long time and have bought elite and regular and let me tell you on paper they may look similar and some times weigh close to each other but the elite is always better.

    in this particular comparison the Elite 52TX beats the 1015tx
    Better Total Harmonic Distortion
    analog to digital conversion
    better component selection
    dolby noise reduction on any input
    2 year warranty

    shop on the internet...you may find price difference smaller than you think...check epinions.com

    by the way I would really recommend that you step up to the VSX-56TXi
    you can find it on the net for less than 999 US now.

    see ya

  8. #8
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025

    A few things:

    Quote Originally Posted by ciscokid1970

    in this particular comparison the Elite 52TX beats the 1015tx
    Better Total Harmonic Distortion
    analog to digital conversion
    better component selection
    dolby noise reduction on any input
    2 year warranty


    see ya
    After doing some digging I've discovered a few things....the THD figures between these two units are NOT different. The only difference is the arbitrary rating scheme Pioneer chose to use to market them (obviously through different distribution channels). The 1015 rates at 120 watts , the 52TX at 110 watts..
    If you take the time to read the manuals, you'll see the 1015tx also boasts the same THD figures at the 110 watts.
    Someone was nice enough to send me a few links on this very subject that even refer to the service manuals, as this question comes up quite a bit on other web forums.. Turns out the DAC's, amps etc, are all the same. There really isn't much difference. I don't know about Dolby NR, but I know enough about Dolby NR to know that's not a feature I would ever want.

    The warranty seems to be the only difference aside from a few connections.

  9. #9
    AR Regular evil__betty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Great White North
    Posts
    164
    My Pioneer rep has informed me that there is absolutly no difference in the ciritry between these two models. Often what happens is that the Elite model comes out a least a year before the 'regular' line does. When the 'regular' line updates, it often matches or exceeds the standards set by the Elite line that has been on the market for longer. There is then a period of time where the Elite and 'regular' lines are retailing at the same time for much higher prices points - with the difference being in the badging and warranty (three years total) only. Then later on, the Elite line updates and the process starts over again. This goes the same for the Elite plasmas as well. The top-end 'regular' and entry-level Elite are often more similar than they are different - but you pay dearly for that ever-so-slight difference. Pioneer trys to cover up these glaring similarities by rating the product in a way that it is different, but still the same (see kexodusc's post above).

    Buy wisely.

  10. #10
    Forum Regular ttskyline01's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    27
    I just bought the Pioneer 1015 and i must say that the 1015 is a BEAST and my Def Tech's sound a lot better on the 1015 than Yamaha 440. Although if I were to get the Yammie 1600, they would sound great on them just as well.

  11. #11
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    Quote Originally Posted by ttskyline01
    I just bought the Pioneer 1015 and i must say that the 1015 is a BEAST and my Def Tech's sound a lot better on the 1015 than Yamaha 440. Although if I were to get the Yammie 1600, they would sound great on them just as well.
    Congrats. Enjoy the thunder.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  12. #12
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    dallas, tx
    Posts
    33

    try them both out

    If you can try them out side by side...see or hear the difference.

    All I am saying is that whey I was shopping for my receiver I brought home pioneer 914k and pioneer elite 53tx.

    Both had similar specs, both had auto calibration and weighed close to each other.

    But there most certainly was a difference in sound. Maybee the actual software running in it or better production control or better components...I am not sure but there most certainly was a difference to my ears.

    your money do what you want.

  13. #13
    AR Regular evil__betty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Great White North
    Posts
    164
    There is a big difference between the 914 of last year and the 1015 of this year. So to compare a those two won't give you an acurate judgement of the 1015 and the 52TX.

  14. #14
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    You can tell the 914 is a totally different platform of reciever than the 1015 just by the physical dimensions and weight. It's probably similar to this years 915 model.

  15. #15
    AUTOBOT BRANDONH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    GRANBURY, TX
    Posts
    541

    Chassis

    Quote Originally Posted by kexodusc
    Okay Pioneer lovers, I need your help. Long story short, there's an extremely good chance I'll be buying a new receiver in a week or two...
    These two units have definitely caught my attention, and curiousity is getting the better of me. But what the hell is the difference between them aside from the cosmetics and a few goofy space age RS-232C connections that I won't ever use?

    Is there anything notoriously better about the Elite receiver over the 1015TX unit? Are they infact the same chassis, platform, and componentry throughout? Salesperson was very nice, and I trust him, told me there's about a $150 difference between the units, but doesn't really know much more than. Just assumes that because "Elite" is on the front, it's better.

    I'm not so sure....they're both built in Malaysia...same assembly line? Is that at all like those parallel Yamaha and Denon product lines?

    Anyone know?
    They have different chassis.
    And I believe the quality control is higher on the Elite Models
    IMO the Elite models hold their value longer.
    Below are some links for comparison:
    Elite VSX-52TX
    http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pn...etailComponent
    http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pi...X-VSX-52TX.pdf



    Pioneer VSX-1015TX
    http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pn...686388,00.html
    http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pi...Tear-sheet.pdf

    http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pi...K_Rear_300.jpg
    Last edited by BRANDONH; 11-22-2005 at 11:22 AM.
    my system
    Technics SL-1210M5G
    OC9/MLII
    Marantz AV8003
    Oppo BD-83
    Yamaha C-70
    Crown MA-12000i
    Emotiva XPA-5

  16. #16
    3db
    3db is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    527

    I didn't know you were a Canuck

    Quote Originally Posted by kexodusc
    geez, is it $400 cdn difference?

    I'd be buying it back in the US and bringing it home duty/tax free. That saves a bit. Must be a larger markup on the Elite too.

    This is what I was lead to believe. That the older 1014TX and 52TX were 95% identical, and that the 1015TX was the "updated" version of the 1014TX.

    That's aweful tempting. We'll see what happens.
    I went into futur shop looking at the Pioneer 1015TX and the YahamaHTR5890. I knows there's 500 Cdn difference between the two of them. I'm still leaning towards the Yammy because of their bullet proof reliability. NAD would be my 1st choice if I had money.

    C'mon 649 *Chuckles*

  17. #17
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    [QUOTE=BRANDONH]They have different chassis.
    And I believe the quality control is higher on the Elite Models
    IMO the Elite models hold their value longer.
    Below are some links for comparison:
    Elite VSX-52TX
    [QUOTE]

    I think you're right about the resale values, and the warranties are better with Elites usually. Quality control is probably more discriminating too, but that doesn't mean the quality is any better. Just slightly more predictable. Considering these use a great deal of the same internal components, I think one can sleep tight on quality. It's not like there's been a rotten spell of Pioneer receivers lately anyway.

    But the service manual is evidence enough of the chassis being the same. Aside from a few inputs being shuffled in placement, and arbitrary cosmetics.
    Same dimensions, power supply, amps, transistors, decoders, weight etc....

  18. #18
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Quote Originally Posted by 3db
    I went into futur shop looking at the Pioneer 1015TX and the YahamaHTR5890. I knows there's 500 Cdn difference between the two of them. I'm still leaning towards the Yammy because of their bullet proof reliability. NAD would be my 1st choice if I had money.

    C'mon 649 *Chuckles*
    I'm hoping to get a weekend with the 1015Tx soon...I'll compare it to my RX-V1400 which is close enough to the 5890. Then I'll make my own decision.

    All early indications are that Pioneer has a real value-heavyweight here though. For someone like me who doesn't hold onto these things for more than 2 or 3 years, I'll take my chances.

  19. #19
    3db
    3db is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    527

    Will b einterested in reading your comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by kexodusc
    I'm hoping to get a weekend with the 1015Tx soon...I'll compare it to my RX-V1400 which is close enough to the 5890. Then I'll make my own decision.

    All early indications are that Pioneer has a real value-heavyweight here though. For someone like me who doesn't hold onto these things for more than 2 or 3 years, I'll take my chances.
    What kinda speakers are You driving? Just to give me an idea? I've got PSBs image series ; T45s as my mains, 1B as my surround, 8C center channel and a subsonic5 subwoofer

  20. #20
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Chicagoland area (Streamwood, IL)
    Posts
    489
    Kex- Is the Pioneer going to replace the Yamaha? If so, why? Dedicated to another set-up? Just wondering.

  21. #21
    AUTOBOT BRANDONH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    GRANBURY, TX
    Posts
    541
    I think you're right about the resale values, and the warranties are better with Elites usually. Quality control is probably more discriminating too, but that doesn't mean the quality is any better. Just slightly more predictable. Considering these use a great deal of the same internal components, I think one can sleep tight on quality. It's not like there's been a rotten spell of Pioneer receivers lately anyway.

    But the service manual is evidence enough of the chassis being the same. Aside from a few inputs being shuffled in placement, and arbitrary cosmetics.
    Same dimensions, power supply, amps, transistors, decoders, weight etc....
    Yea, I guess that Elite has stopped using a different chassis then the Pioneer models like they used to.
    My Elite VSX-39TX for example they used an all copper chassis, copper screws and I think even copper wiring and even the power cord was extra heavy duty compared to the sister Pioneer model. And they also boasted that Elite only used the highest quality components as opposed to the Pioneer.
    So if there is really no difference in the quality in todays Elite then I would see no reason now to even look at an Elite as I did in the old days, Sad.
    my system
    Technics SL-1210M5G
    OC9/MLII
    Marantz AV8003
    Oppo BD-83
    Yamaha C-70
    Crown MA-12000i
    Emotiva XPA-5

  22. #22
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Think you're missing the point, BrandonH. The Elites all use different chassis than the Pioneer line with 1 exception, the 1015 TX. There's 4 other, smaller models by some 9 or 10 lbs. There's also some models in Europe, and other distribution channels that are identical to the Elite models, with different model numbers, that are exactly the same in quality and performance, but don't have the "elite" badge. Naming something "Elite" is pure marketing anyway, the proof is in the guts. You could call a 17lb receiver "Elite" all you want, doesn't make it so... Pioneer is taking a very low margin on the 1015tx model to win back market share. Seems to be creating a lot of buzz, so I'm sure they're happy. Most long-time Pioneer fanboys I know are very happy that the company is getting it's act together again and offering their higher quality products at mass market prices. They've been very aggressive the past few years. Nothing wrong with that, and certainly no indication of a reduction in quality. The whole idea of an "Elite" line is kind of stupid anyway.

  23. #23
    Pat
    Pat is offline
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by BRANDONH
    My Elite
    Usually I'm not too fond of gold equipment but this Pioneer looks very nice.........
    Have a good day.....Sez' Pat
    Denon 685 Receiver & 2900 Player, Sonographe 120 Amp, Klipsch RF7 Speakers, 2039+ svs Sub, 10gauge solid core copper cables

  24. #24
    Forum Regular Woochifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    6,883
    I don't know anything about these models in particular, but I know that in the past Pioneer has done some rebadging with the Elite models in that line's entry level models. Not all that different from what Onkyo does with their Integra models, or how Sony handles their ES line. Given the price point that you're looking at, I doubt that Pioneer's going to create a whole new model just for the Elite line.

    If you've inspected the models you're interested in, and noticed that they look identical underneath, I would say that they probably are functionally identical with only minor differences in the details. If anything tilts in favor of the Elite models, it's with the longer warranty and their specialty dealer network, which usually does better with customer support than their mass merchandising retailers.

    You'll have to report back to us on how the new receiver compares with your RX-V1400. I recently heard the VSX-74TXVi and thought its sound quality was a step up on the Denon AVR-3805 (which cost $500 less). If the rest of the Pioneer Elite lineup hints at that level of sound quality, then I'm very impressed with the strides that Pioneer has made.

  25. #25
    AUTOBOT BRANDONH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    GRANBURY, TX
    Posts
    541
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat
    Usually I'm not too fond of gold equipment but this Pioneer looks very nice.........
    Thanks Pat
    I also have a matching LD (CLD-99) and CD (PD-65) player and they do look nice lined up in the rack.
    I set the unit up only as a preamp though.

    Quote Originally Posted by kexodusc
    Think you're missing the point, BrandonH. The Elites all use different chassis than the Pioneer line with 1 exception, the 1015 TX. There's 4 other, smaller models by some 9 or 10 lbs. There's also some models in Europe, and other distribution channels that are identical to the Elite models, with different model numbers, that are exactly the same in quality and performance, but don't have the "elite" badge. Naming something "Elite" is pure marketing anyway, the proof is in the guts. You could call a 17lb receiver "Elite" all you want, doesn't make it so... Pioneer is taking a very low margin on the 1015tx model to win back market share. Seems to be creating a lot of buzz, so I'm sure they're happy. Most long-time Pioneer fanboys I know are very happy that the company is getting it's act together again and offering their higher quality products at mass market prices. They've been very aggressive the past few years. Nothing wrong with that, and certainly no indication of a reduction in quality. The whole idea of an "Elite" line is kind of stupid anyway.
    Sorry kexodusc,
    I guess I did miss the point and thanks for clearing it up.
    Back in the day there was a build quality difference between the two.
    I did not know that they were no longer assembled in Japan like mine was. And also do not know it they still can only be sold by Elite authorized dealers only.
    And I agree, if there is no real quality difference in todays Pioneer and Elite then it is kinda stupid.
    Here is a fun link:
    http://www.elitestereo.netfirms.com/commentary.htm
    Last edited by BRANDONH; 11-24-2005 at 08:28 AM.
    my system
    Technics SL-1210M5G
    OC9/MLII
    Marantz AV8003
    Oppo BD-83
    Yamaha C-70
    Crown MA-12000i
    Emotiva XPA-5

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •