View Poll Results: Classical recordings: what's your usual priority?

Voters
4. You may not vote on this poll
  • Decent performance + Great sound

    2 50.00%
  • Great performance + Whatever sound

    2 50.00%
  • Decent performance & sound + Low price

    0 0%
  • Whatever's in the bargain bin

    0 0%
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127

    Classical recordings: Performance, sound, or price?

    When you're looking to buy a classical recording, what's your usual priority?

    For me it's usually good performance with great sound.

    But not always: some time I want to sample repertoire with which I'm not familiar in which case price becomes more important. Long live Naxos!

  2. #2
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    884
    Quote Originally Posted by Feanor
    When you're looking to buy a classical recording, what's your usual priority?

    For me it's usually good performance with great sound.

    But not always: some time I want to sample repertoire with which I'm not familiar in which case price becomes more important. Long live Naxos!
    Well, of the choices, I took a great performance with whatever sound. However, the sound should be good enough that I can appreciate the performance.

    Your comments raise another couple of issues: price and repertoire. One of the things I go for is repertoire, and I like to get a great variety of music. The low Naxos price is helpful, but the Polygram group has budget reissues that are often very good: London, Philips, DG, Mercury, etc., and Denons are often available cheap..

    Naxos recordings recorded since about 1993 are usually have very good to excellent sound quality. Before that you take your chances with the sound, which sometimes is not very good, and may want to check the reviews first. The performances are pretty competent, often excellent.

    So, basically, I like a very good performance with at least adequate sound. If the sound is too harsh, I really can't appreciate an orchestral performance. But often enough, one can find excellent performances which are well-recorded.
    "Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony."
    ------Heraclitus of Ephesis (fl. 504-500 BC), trans. Wheelwright.

  3. #3
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat D
    ... So, basically, I like a very good performance with at least adequate sound. If the sound is too harsh, I really can't appreciate an orchestral performance. But often enough, one can find excellent performances which are well-recorded.
    Beeing musically untrained as I am is a mixed blessing. (I've had no musical training worth mentioning, don't read music nor play an instrument.) That probably prevents me from decerning the great from merely good performances -- sad.

    On the other hand, I can probably more readily trade off some performance for good sound or lower cost than the true musician can. For sure Naxos typically offers a great combination of performance, sound, and price.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 07-05-2011, 03:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •