A/V Receivers

Printable View

  • 03-04-2011, 06:00 AM
    magtrw
    1 Attachment(s)
    Magneplanar Tympani bass
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Mr Peabody
    Nice set up magtrw. The Gallo's would make great surrounds and I bet they still make a pretty good match witht the ML's. Why aren't you using the Summit's bass modules?

    I use Magneplanar Tympani IV bass panels instead of the
    Martin Logans woofers because of several reasons. The
    Magneplanar bass panels, being a dipole, match the Summits
    dipole electrostatic elements and integrate perfectly. One gets
    superior depth, ambience, stunning bass impact, a huge
    sound-stage and a realistic size of instruments. Each two bass
    panels have 1254 sq. inches of surface area with very low mass
    providing very quick and exciting bass response. This combo
    of speakers far outclasses just using the Martin Logan Summits.
    I have a very large room and the Summits bass is good, but
    no comparison to the Magneplanar Tympanis. The Tympanis
    are driven by an Audio Research D400MKII power amp that
    is individually controlled utilizing a Mark Levinson 380S
    preamp (the volume control has .1 db increments) which gives
    one total control of balance.
  • 03-04-2011, 05:46 PM
    Mr Peabody
    An online friend has a set of the Tempani and talked about the great bass. I believed him but it was hard to imagine from Maggies. The Tempani must be the way to go if one has the room. I'd like to hear them some day.
  • 03-05-2011, 02:30 AM
    basite
    intersting :)

    but why aren't you using the tympani's alltogether?
    and isn't that projector in your way when watching movies?

    Great system!

    Keep them spinning,
    Bert.
  • 03-05-2011, 06:01 AM
    magtrw
    1 Attachment(s)
    Hybrid system
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by basite
    intersting :)

    but why aren't you using the tympani's alltogether?
    and isn't that projector in your way when watching movies?

    Great system!

    Keep them spinning,
    Bert.

    I use Martin Logan Summits for the electrostatic transducers that
    are considerably better than the midrange and tweeter of the
    Magneplanar Tympanis. The electrostatic transducers are better
    for several reasons. There is no xover between the midrange
    and high frequency range and because of this the imaging is
    far superior to the Tympanis. Another area is low level detail
    that is simply awesome and transparency is also in a class by
    itself. Electrostatic transducers have far less distortion because
    of the operating principle. The technique is known as push-pull
    operation and is a major contributor to the sonic purity of the
    electrostatic concept due to its exceptional linearity and low
    distortion. Since the diaphragm of an electrostatic speaker is uniformly
    driven over its entire area, it can be extremely light and flexible.

    As for the projector, it is not blocking the screen because the
    seating is raised up and the view is perfect. With the projector being
    located in a straight line with the screen the picture is sharper
    and brighter.
  • 03-05-2011, 06:24 AM
    Mr Peabody
    I've heard several ML models and a few different Maggies and I have to agree, I've always preferred the stats.
  • 03-05-2011, 02:18 PM
    harley .guy07
    Hell I just wish I had the room for all of that speaker madness. But I am sure it sounds good I have just never seen someone use different parts of two different panel speakers before in there system, very interesting. As long as it gets you your audio the way you like it then that's all that matter right?
  • 03-05-2011, 02:21 PM
    harley .guy07
    Oh and I like the blue seating. Its my favorite color and it fits the room well.