Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27
  1. #1
    Suspended atomicAdam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Oaktown!
    Posts
    1,774

    How to choose - stereo vs multi channel

    So if a friend asked you - should I get a two channel stereo system vs a multi channel home theater audio system?

    What would be your responses, or reasons for one over the other.

  2. #2
    Oldest join date recoveryone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,435
    I would question their intent on use as I do with people who ask me about computers.
    I then go into the biggest question: How much do you expect to spend, cause there is no need to go into some big old spill about high end gear and they only want to spend on Wal Mart prices.

    When that is clear, I explain what they should expect to get. I explain if cost is a major hurdle, then used gear could be an option.
    HT
    Pioneer Elite SC lx502
    Pioneer Elite N50
    Pioneer Cassette CTM66R
    Pioneer Elite BDP 85FD

    Vizio P series 2160p
    Panamax 5300 EX

  3. #3
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,421
    A 2ch system generally will give you better sound depending upon the equipment you buy. With a 2ch system you will have more money dedicated to the amp, speakers and source vs having to spend money on several speakers for surround sound. With that being said, you still can get excellent sound from a multichannel system when used for music. It's all about the money and how much you want to spend.
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Luxman DA-06 DAC
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Dual Martin Logan Original Dynamo Subs
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

  4. #4
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Comes down to money. Systems designed for multi-channel music playback (not talking inexpensive home theater crap here) should sound better, but it won't be cheaper, or even equivalent in cost. I don't think you can make a multi-channel system sound as good as a stereo system with equal budgets. It won't necessarily be 2.5 times the price but it'll cost significantly more. Throw in the disparity in the available selections of multi-channel vs stereo recordings and it certainly makes you think twice.

    If money was unlimited, multi channel.

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    For the same dollars, thinking sane budget, I would rather have a higher quality 2 channel system.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  6. #6
    Ajani
    Guest
    I think the deciding factor is whatever your friend is more interested in...

    If his priority is music, then a 2 channel system is the best option...

    If he cares more for movies (or multichannel music) then a MC system would be the right choice...

    I haven't owned a MC system in 12 years (because I could care less about movies or MC music)... However if I was into movies more than music then I would own a MC system...

  7. #7
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    I would start by asking questions.

    What is most important to you? Music or HT? Percentages? Budget? Room size?

    You can't really give a good answer before knowing these answers. Otherwise, you're just telling your friend what you want instead of helping them with what they want.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  8. #8
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Mount Vernon, Ohio
    Posts
    72
    Agreed on questions about listening priority. If they don't care about HT or if they only want it for HT should be pretty well decided in their mind already.

    However, if they really kinda want both and clearly aren't going to buy two separate systems to start with, then they should focus on the MC system just because it can be used for both. If they can't afford to do the whole thing right away, then I would generally encourage them to start with an AVR and the front speakers, then save up and add a center, then surrounds, then subwoofer.

    While high end shows are all about 2-channel, I believe that most of the growth in hifi gear sales over the next few years will be in HT systems. All those people who now have large screen tv's are all prime candidates, and their desire for better sound is driven by movies. (the high cost of going out to the movies is helping drive this too) They will absolutely use their system for music, but it's secondary, and the key will really be that it's a living room system that the whole family uses and it's the only system they have. Creating gear that functions well for both will be more important than ever.
    Tim Evans
    East Street Audio
    Onix, Melody, & ACA

  9. #9
    Music Junkie E-Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by atomicAdam
    So if a friend asked you - should I get a two channel stereo system vs a multi channel home theater audio system?
    I think the most important factor has already been determined. Which format best describes your music library? If only 1% of your collection is multi-channel (like me), it doesn't make sense to lower the overall quality by diluting your budget to provide the additional channels. If, on the other hand, your collection of MC content is much higher, then it would make sense to optimize the system to accommodate those recordings instead. The overwhelming majority of new music releases (save classical), however, remains stereo.

    I have separate systems for that reason. Two channel for music and MC for movies. I enjoy the surround effects that are part of most movie soundtracks.

    rw

  10. #10
    Forum Regular pixelthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,528

    Cool

    just ask if you really need multichannel, especially for music. NEVER been a fan of
    multichannel music. If used for ambiance, then sure. An accurate sound stage is what I AM ABOUT.
    so after asking what their preference is, then concentrate on that.
    I have found that a "hybrid" system, where the front two channels are a high q audio system,
    which plugs into a multichannel system, the best of both worlds, and that is usually what I
    advise for moderate audio enthusiasts. But if you really love audio then concentrating on that
    might be the thing.
    For real audio crazies a high end audio system, and a separate HTIB . The high end system
    being two channel , of course. MULTICHANNEL audio is just strange, like baloney topped
    off with chocolate cake.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    LG 42", integra 6.9, B&W 602s2, CC6 center, dm305rears, b&w
    sub asw2500
    Panny DVDA player
    sharp Aquos BLU player
    pronto remote, technics antique direct drive TT
    Samsung SACD/DVDA player
    emotiva upa-2 two channel amp

  11. #11
    Phila combat zone JoeE SP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,710
    Really nice post "pixie"! I went with a "hybrid" system because I already had a 2 channel music system and lack of space for separate rooms. My system is optimized for 2 channel music listening. For surround/MC sources the processor, rear speakers and amps are added.
    ARC SP9 MKIII, VPI HW19, Rega RB300
    Marcof PPA1, Shure, Sumiko, Ortofon carts, Yamaha DVD-S1800
    Behringer UCA222, Emotiva XDA-2, HiFimeDIY
    Accuphase T101, Teac V-7010, Nak ZX-7. LX-5, Behringer DSP1124P
    Front: Magnepan 1.7, DBX 223SX, 2 modified Dynaco MK3's, 2, 12" DIY TL subs (Pass El-Pipe-O) 2 bridged Crown XLS-402
    Rear/HT: Emotiva UMC200, Acoustat Model 1/SPW-1, Behringer CX2310, 2 Adcom GFA-545

  12. #12
    Forum Regular blackraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,421
    Pix, I didnt know that you had such an nice Butt!
    Pass Labs X250 amp, BAT Vk-51se Preamp,
    Thorens TD-145 TT, Bellari phono preamp, Nagaoka MP-200 Cartridge
    Magnepan QR1.6 speakers
    Luxman DA-06 DAC
    Van Alstine Ultra Plus Hybrid Tube DAC
    Dual Martin Logan Original Dynamo Subs
    Parasound A21 amp
    Vintage Luxman T-110 tuner
    Magnepan MMG's, Grant Fidelity DAC-11, Class D CDA254 amp
    Monitor Audio S1 speakers, PSB B6 speakers
    Vintage Technic's Integrated amp
    Music Hall 25.2 CDP
    Adcom GFR 700 AVR
    Cables- Cardas, Silnote, BJC
    Velodyne CHT 8 sub

  13. #13
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    201
    My friend had to make this decision last year and I recommended a HT system because his family is always watching movies. They purchased the Onyko top of the line HT receiver and Monitor Audio speakers. Now he said he is enjoying 2 channel stereo and multichannel for movies. For me I prefer a hybrid setup.

  14. #14
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    Quote Originally Posted by blackraven
    Pix, I didnt know that you had such an nice Butt!
    And now my mind's eye has gone dark.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  15. #15
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    15
    The best answer here is to save and buy the best pair of speakers one could afford. Then what ever you do is likely to sound good either way. Buy used wherever possible. A two year old higher end home theater receiver would be smart or EMOTIVA seperates to begin with. A decent Sony es dvd player to play music. Not the best solution but a start.

  16. #16
    Forum Regular pixelthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,528

    Unhappy

    Quote Originally Posted by blackraven
    Pix, I didnt know that you had such an nice Butt!
    I did, but the girlfriend took it with her when she left.
    LG 42", integra 6.9, B&W 602s2, CC6 center, dm305rears, b&w
    sub asw2500
    Panny DVDA player
    sharp Aquos BLU player
    pronto remote, technics antique direct drive TT
    Samsung SACD/DVDA player
    emotiva upa-2 two channel amp

  17. #17
    Scum Low Life (O0o*o0O)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    High! In Mile High
    Posts
    60

    Q&a

    That would be a question I would love out of a customer. Most don't know the difference and have no idea what a 2-channel is. I love 2-channel customers, because I know they are into music. A lot of the time if people come over and see no Playstation they see no equipment.

    Music or Movies?

    The only question to ask in my opinion. I know for myself just getting my first 2-channel stereo in years the difference it has from my HT receiver.

  18. #18
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    538
    I feel most people are oriented toward those 5.1 and 7.1 systems they see advertised by hhgregg or BB. So I have found that it is a waste of time to talk upmarket to them. My brother comes to mind. But if they later decided they really wanted something better.......

    And this would be funky....

    I would have them hear our "standard" TV system in our bedroom: Audio courtesy of Mackie HR824's with a 15" Velodyne. Then we could switch the audio to the CJ10B/Jolida/MMG/15" Velodyne setup. One or the other will get 'em. Either is quite good for Phantom of the Opera. Those 15" V-dynes belt out an organ's pedal notes the way no commercial 5.1 or 7.1 ever could. The 15" V-d would really get their undivided attention............ But seating is a bit limited.

  19. #19
    Forum Regular hifitommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    sylmar, ca. in beautiful so cal earthquake country
    Posts
    1,442
    even though i have the equipment for full 5.1, i use a stereo/dynaquad setup for ambience recovery which works surprisingly well for video except when a center channel is dominantly embedded into the program that cannot be defeated. its rare but there.

    i have stated before that dolby pro-logic can be effectively used for ambience retrieval if adjusted so the rears are just subtly detected by the listener just as i do with the dynaquad. you can easily just go back to stereo if preferred but you may find ambience recovery to be preferable for all sources. i run my pre/pro through my stereo preamp so my main audio sources are more direct. all the video sources are switched through the nuforce pre/pro.

    and YES congrats to you pixi for a lucid, useful post. keep up the good work.
    ...regards...tr

  20. #20
    Forum Regular pixelthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,528

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by hifitommy
    even though i have the equipment for full 5.1, i use a stereo/dynaquad setup for ambience recovery which works surprisingly well for video except when a center channel is dominantly embedded into the program that cannot be defeated. its rare but there.

    i have stated before that dolby pro-logic can be effectively used for ambience retrieval if adjusted so the rears are just subtly detected by the listener just as i do with the dynaquad. you can easily just go back to stereo if preferred but you may find ambience recovery to be preferable for all sources. i run my pre/pro through my stereo preamp so my main audio sources are more direct. all the video sources are switched through the nuforce pre/pro.

    and YES congrats to you pixi for a lucid, useful post. keep up the good work.
    THE ONLY reason you would need a basically obsolete tool like pro logic is if
    PRO LOGIC II is not available. Pro-logic is basically obsolete.
    Talk about deriving "ambience", that is pro-logic II's stock in trade.
    It can make a movie with a stereo soundtrack sound like DD 5.1. THATS PRO-LOGIC MOVIE.
    Pro-logic music is for stereo to multichannel music.
    DTS neo is basically the same thing, but DTS.
    THE OLD PROLOGIC basically just gets the difference info from the front and shoots it to the back two channels, which get the same info. Its basically obsolete.
    A 200$ receiver with pro-logic II can blow its doors off. It belongs in the attic next to
    buggy whips and eight track tape players.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    LG 42", integra 6.9, B&W 602s2, CC6 center, dm305rears, b&w
    sub asw2500
    Panny DVDA player
    sharp Aquos BLU player
    pronto remote, technics antique direct drive TT
    Samsung SACD/DVDA player
    emotiva upa-2 two channel amp

  21. #21
    Forum Regular hifitommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    sylmar, ca. in beautiful so cal earthquake country
    Posts
    1,442
    i didnt see the need to list all the formats that can give you ambience recovery. and yes, people DO use outmoded systems, what do you suppose dynaquad is? you cant buy one new anymore unless its nos.

    btw, pro-logic and its successors are based on the dynaquad circuit devised by david hafler.
    ...regards...tr

  22. #22
    Forum Regular pixelthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,528

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by hifitommy
    i didnt see the need to list all the formats that can give you ambience recovery. and yes, people DO use outmoded systems, what do you suppose dynaquad is? you cant buy one new anymore unless its nos.

    btw, pro-logic and its successors are based on the dynaquad circuit devised by david hafler.
    Learn something everyday. But it doesn't matter if it was created by a thousand monkeys
    throwing stuff around in a parts house, still obsolete.
    Sorry.
    You do know that using the new codec would sound loads better, right?
    Not that I HAVE anything against others using "obsolete" systems. HELPED us
    win a lot of wars.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    LG 42", integra 6.9, B&W 602s2, CC6 center, dm305rears, b&w
    sub asw2500
    Panny DVDA player
    sharp Aquos BLU player
    pronto remote, technics antique direct drive TT
    Samsung SACD/DVDA player
    emotiva upa-2 two channel amp

  23. #23
    Forum Regular hifitommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    sylmar, ca. in beautiful so cal earthquake country
    Posts
    1,442
    pixie,

    you should throw out the " technics antique direct drive TT" ASAP. its obsolete.
    ...regards...tr

  24. #24
    Forum Regular pixelthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,528

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by hifitommy
    pixie,

    you should throw out the " technics antique direct drive TT" ASAP. its obsolete.
    CAN you figure out another way to play a LP record? Tried using a pocketknife once,
    didn't work that well.
    As long as I have to listen to the pretenders "learning to crawl" or Gill Scott HERON
    it will not be "obsolete". Just snap, crackle, poppy.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails How to choose - stereo vs multi channel-dscf0092.jpg  
    LG 42", integra 6.9, B&W 602s2, CC6 center, dm305rears, b&w
    sub asw2500
    Panny DVDA player
    sharp Aquos BLU player
    pronto remote, technics antique direct drive TT
    Samsung SACD/DVDA player
    emotiva upa-2 two channel amp

  25. #25
    Forum Regular hifitommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    sylmar, ca. in beautiful so cal earthquake country
    Posts
    1,442
    why bother with obsolete technology? i am just trying to follow your "philosophy".
    ...regards...tr

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •