Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659

    OK, who is interested in a brand new tube receiver for $164?

    And it puts out 2,000, yes, TWO THOUSAND WATTS!!!

    Would I lie to you?

    I can honestly say this a real Pyle. Of what, though, is the real question.

    (Is there such a thing as "white van receivers"?)

  2. #2
    Ajani
    Guest
    2000 watts peak... lol... probably at 1 ohm, 1 channel for 1/1,000,000,000th of a second (before the receiver explodes)

  3. #3
    Shostakovich fan Feanor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    8,127
    Quote Originally Posted by markw
    And it puts out 2,000, yes, TWO THOUSAND WATTS!!!

    Would I lie to you?

    I can honestly say this a real Pyle. Of what, though, is the real question.

    (Is there such a thing as "white van receivers"?)
    A bargoon my friend, surely. After all the listprice is $334.


  4. #4
    Class of the clown GMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anywhere but here...
    Posts
    13,243
    It is Pyle. Most of their stuff is a pile of Pyle.
    WARNING! - The Surgeon General has determined that, time spent listening to music is not deducted from one's lifespan.

  5. #5
    _ Luvin Da Blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    _
    Posts
    1,951
    Does that say ANUS on the display??? Kinda appropriate.
    Back in my day, we had nine planets.

  6. #6
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    90
    I have to admit I'd like to see a review of it.

  7. #7
    Heavymetalist m.powers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Louisville Ky.
    Posts
    12
    2000 Watts? What ever happened to real RMS? When Wattage actually
    ment something, that could be interperated in the good old USA!!!!!!!!!

  8. #8
    I took a headstart... basite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mortsel, Antwerp, Belgium, Europe, Earth
    Posts
    3,056
    I wonder if the tubes are actually connected to anything at all...

    the front plate is a shameless ripoff of the previous line of Denon receivers, as are the knobs, even the remote is darn similar...

    no way that even puts out 100 watts, without audible disortion...
    for 10 seconds,
    after which it'll explode, and melt down in your rack...
    Life is music!

    Mcintosh MA6400 Integrated
    Double Advent speakers
    Thiel CS2.3's
    *DIY Lenco L75 TT
    * SME 3012 S2
    * Rega RB-301
    *Denon DL-103 in midas body
    *Denon DL-304
    *Graham slee elevator EXP & revelation
    *Lehmann audio black cube SE
    Marantz CD5001 OSE
    MIT AVt 2 IC's
    Sonic link Black earth IC's
    Siltech MXT New york IC's
    Kimber 4VS speakercable
    Furutech powercord and plugs.

    I'm a happy 20 year old...

  9. #9
    Aging Smartass
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Moore, SC
    Posts
    1,003
    Well, the listing says 260 watts at 8 ohms, but doesn't specifiy if that's total power, one channel only, level of distortion, frequency at which it was measured, etc., etc.

    This reminds me of the power wars back in the early 70's when the ludicrous "plus or minus 1 db." suffix was added to a receiver/amp's power ratings. All of a sudden, something previously rated at one level, jumped over 20 %, and it was all perfectly legal, if misleading.

    The Lafayette LR-1500TA receiver (a Consumer Reports "Check-Rated Best Buy" for 5 years running) sold for $300, and was initially rated at "150 watts IHF into 8 ohms." Ultimately, the receiver was rated at 240 wats at 4 ohms, and with the "plus or minus...." nonsense added. Nothing had changed about the receiver - just the advertised specs.

    At a MacIntosh lab clinic, the LR-1500TA was measured to deliver a solid 36 watts per channel at 8 ohms, with both channels driven. While that was a respectable amount of power for a receiver in the day, it was a far cry from "240 watts at 4 ohms, plus or minus 1 db." And so, it all starts again...

  10. #10
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,380
    None of the documentation mentions the tubes. What are they?
    The Owners Manual says 1% distortion but for the price, it may be a better choice than other cheapo units.

  11. #11
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659
    Quote Originally Posted by Hyfi
    None of the documentation mentions the tubes. What are they?
    The Owners Manual says 1% distortion but for the price, it may be a better choice than other cheapo units.
    I take it the 40 to 15khz response doesn't bother you?

    Poke around the owner's manual here.

  12. #12
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,380
    Quote Originally Posted by markw
    I take it the 40 to 15khz response doesn't bother you?

    Poke around the owner's manual here.
    That is what I was looking at. My comment was more about comparing to other similarly priced ($159 at some places) tube receivers. If I wasn't an audio nut, no none of that would bother me.

  13. #13
    Suspended markw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Noo Joisey. Youse got a problem wit dat?
    Posts
    4,659
    Quote Originally Posted by Hyfi
    That is what I was looking at. My comment was more about comparing to other similarly priced ($159 at some places) tube receivers. If I wasn't an audio nut, no none of that would bother me.
    There are other similarly priced tube receivers out there? I've never stumbled across any before. Can you post a link or two?

    Offhand, if I wewe looking for abudget two-channel, NIB, I think I'd go with the Sherwood 41xx series. They have been around a while and I know a few people who have them (on my recommendation).

  14. #14
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,380
    Quote Originally Posted by markw
    There are other similarly priced tube receivers out there? I've never stumbled across any before. Can you post a link or two?

    Offhand, if I wewe looking for abudget two-channel, NIB, I think I'd go with the Sherwood 41xx series. They have been around a while and I know a few people who have them (on my recommendation).
    Ha! There are none of course but when I was looking, the Sherwood is what I found and it's specs are pretty good compared the Pyle of crap.

    Sure would be interesting to hear it though.

  15. #15
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    125
    I am lost for words!! And to think that I paid 3 times as much for a kit....sob....and when assembled it put out a mere 20 Watts per channel.... and it didnīt self destruct nor reduce my speakers to subatomic particles upon switching on. Mind you, I made sure that the wife was not at home when I hit the "ON" button, just in case I had made a mistake in the wiring!!!
    A vacuum amp of 2000 Watts at this price is best left alone in the box it came in: for fear of finding out how one got robbed.....

  16. #16
    Phila combat zone JoeE SP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,710
    Pyle is very big in the car stereo business. Everyone knows one car stereo Watt is twenty real Watt's!
    ARC SP9 MKIII, VPI HW19, Rega RB300
    Marcof PPA1, Shure, Sumiko, Ortofon carts, Yamaha DVD-S1800
    Behringer UCA222, Emotiva XDA-2, HiFimeDIY
    Accuphase T101, Teac V-7010, Nak ZX-7. LX-5, Behringer DSP1124P
    Front: Magnepan 1.7, DBX 223SX, 2 modified Dynaco MK3's, 2, 12" DIY TL subs (Pass El-Pipe-O) 2 bridged Crown XLS-402
    Rear/HT: Emotiva UMC200, Acoustat Model 1/SPW-1, Behringer CX2310, 2 Adcom GFA-545

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •