I just saw Transporter 2. I was pretty psyched because I enjoyed the first one so much. Well, I was a little disappointed. The story was interesting enough (hey, these movies are about the action anyway!), if not a little contrived from last year's "Man On Fire". Okay, this is not really a review of the film, or the action. The fight sequences were great, but the car sequences involved ALOT of CGI! Yeah, the chase scenes are supposed to be over the top, ala 007. The problem is that the CGI was not done well - at all. It surprised me that so much was used, considering how "real time" the driving stunts were in the first. You really felt like these ridiculous feats were actually being performed before your eyes. You'd think with basically the same team working on this flick, the gritty feel would remain. Don't get me wrong, I did like the movie. I also realize they made it for around 32 million. But sometimes it's just better to have no special effects rather than have them poorly done. It just kinda took me out of the movie. Maybe I'm being too picky.
What's the worst FX you've seen in a major studio release?