Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Forum Regular Woochifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    6,883

    Rumor - Superman II: Donner director's cut in 2006?

    Apparently, in anticipation of Superman Returns Warner is preparing new special edition DVDs for Superman II, III, and IV. The hottest rumor is that this could include a new Richard Donner Director's Cut of Superman II, which would be great news on many fronts. The story here is that original Superman director Richard Donner shot enough footage for nearly two full movies, and before he could finish both of them, he had to rush the first movie into theaters. So, he finished the first movie, but before he could resume with Superman II, the producers fired him. Enter a new director, Richard Lester, who supposedly tossed out more than half of the footage already shot for Superman II and reshot much of the movie.

    Even though at the time it came out, Superman II fared pretty well with critics and audiences, in subsequent years, it has not aged nearly as well as the first Superman has. With this backdrop, there's been a pretty steady clamoring on fan sites over the last few years for someone at Warner to put together a cut of Superman II with the Richard Donner-directed scenes restored. If the rumors are true, this would be great news for those of us who've wondered how Superman II would have turned out if Donner had finished the movie himself.

    The special edition DVDs would also come with new 5.1 soundtracks and bonus discs, which would finally remedy the abysmal DVD treatment that II, III, and IV got with their original movie-only 2.0 DD releases. I never bought those DVDs because I saw both Superman II and Superman III in theaters with 70mm six-track prints. For those titles to subsequently come out on DVD with 2.0 soundtracks, when they got six-track theatrical releases, was inexcusable.

    On paper, it seems that Warner has got a killer set of DVDs coming out for the Batman movies (two-disc special editions with new DTS soundtracks). A similarly stellar treatment for the Superman movies would be welcome news.

    http://www.supermancinema.co.uk/

  2. #2
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    I'm all in favor of seeing some great Superman DVD's, but do we really need another version of "Batman and Robin" or "Batman Forever"? Haven't we really said all that needs to be said with the original DVD. Unless one of the special bonus features is the real film and this has all just been the most elaborate Hollywood prank ever, I think I'll have to pass on the Batman DVD's. Knowing my luck though, it'll be a box set, in order to get the good one you'll have to adopt the others.

    It's a shame the Superman movies haven't held up against time a bit better. I was a huge fan of those as a kid in the 80's. C'mon, name one other hero who can counter Earth's rotation and reverse time!!!

  3. #3
    Resident DVD Reviewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    Wow, I have been hearing COUNTLESS RUMORS about a director's cut of Donner's SUPERMAN II -- which was the best in the series, no doubt -- but never any concrete word about it; that would be GREAT if they did indeed make Superman II into some kind of Special Edition, as that would be the only one I would buy -- I have held off on buying the SUPERMAN COLLECTION box set as Im not really a fan, but part II with General Zod, Non, and the others who escape from the phantom zone was just an awesome comic hero film. I have heard that the transfers on the current Superman box collection arent that great, and so Im holding out for just part II in a Special Edition/Director's Cut, which I would definitely purchase.

    As for the BATMAN films, I WILL be buying that BATMAN MOVIE FRANCHISE set when it arrives this Fall with the remastered double disc versions of these titles because the current transfers are, in my opinion, horrendous. Each film is gonna get DTS audio, to boot!

    I know BATMAN AND ROBIN was one of the worst turds to ever hit celluloid, and its true, it really did suck and Clooney was just horrible --- but Im gonna buy the set to be a completist.....I just dont feel the same about Superman.....

  4. #4
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    317
    Wow, has Warners finally decided to produce some quality sets? No snap cases, please! And DTS! WB has only produced a handful of dvds with a DTS track.
    Superman 2 hasn't held up as well as 1. While I liked the story and characters, the editing eas shoddy, and in my opinion, some of the cheapie looking visuals just didn't age well. I'd love to see it as Donner intended.

  5. #5
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    317
    Also, 1 and 2 are the only installments (so far) I choose to recognize.

  6. #6
    Resident DVD Reviewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    Yes, Def, apparently Warner Brothers is beginning to see the light a little bit by making many of their titles available without those horrible cheap snapper cases and actually getting more involved with Digital Theater Systems; here's a link to what the Batman box set is gonna look like; Im psyched:



    http://www.dvdanswers.com/index.php?...%3D11%26y%3D12

    Also, I TOTALLY agree about Superman.....III and IV were complete wastes of time and celluloid materials....what the HELL were they thinking with that franchise? That was WORSE than the Batman sequels after "Batman Returns"......Jesus.......

  7. #7
    Forum Regular Woochifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    6,883
    Quote Originally Posted by kexodusc
    I'm all in favor of seeing some great Superman DVD's, but do we really need another version of "Batman and Robin" or "Batman Forever"? Haven't we really said all that needs to be said with the original DVD. Unless one of the special bonus features is the real film and this has all just been the most elaborate Hollywood prank ever, I think I'll have to pass on the Batman DVD's. Knowing my luck though, it'll be a box set, in order to get the good one you'll have to adopt the others.

    It's a shame the Superman movies haven't held up against time a bit better. I was a huge fan of those as a kid in the 80's. C'mon, name one other hero who can counter Earth's rotation and reverse time!!!
    The Batman franchise set will be available as a boxed set, but each title will be sold individually as well. (Although the list price on the box set is lower than buying three DVDs by themselves) Even though I like the first two Batman movies and found the third one sort of amusing, I've held off from buying any of the Batman titles because they are all movie-only DVDs with reduced bitrate 384k DD soundtracks. With this new releases, my patience is finally being rewarded with all four Batman movies coming out as two-disc sets complete with DTS soundtracks.

    I think the first Superman has gained in stature in the ensuing years. It suffers from having to spend half the movie on the back story, but it has a timeless almost mythical quality to it that has held up very well, along with a lot of memorable and evocative scenes that aren't all about action (i.e. the scene with young Clark leaving Smallville, and the interview/flight with Lois).

    The second movie is a better straight up adventure film that I thought was better than the first one when I first saw it. But, it's got a lot of holes and cut corners that seem more and more glaring with repeated viewing, and I now view the first movie as a far superior movie overall. Whether restoring the scenes that Richard Donner originally filmed would make for a better and more definitive version of Superman II, I would definitely like to see (supposedly he had completed 80-90% of the film, but when Richard Lester replaced Donner, only about 30% of the Donner footage was actually used).

    The first movie also features arguably John Williams' best score and uses a full orchestra, while the sequel cheaped out by recycling Williams' themes and going with a smaller studio orchestra.

    The series really took a nosedive with the third installment (this ought to give you an idea of how much Richard Donner's vision of the Superman series differed from Richard Lester's) and bottomed out with low budget Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. Rumor also has it that Superman IV got released with over 30 minutes chopped out because Cannon Films (the low budget studio that released that movie) wanted to get the film length down to around 90 minutes (which would allow theaters to squeeze an extra showing). It would be interesting to see whether Superman IV would fare any better restored to its original running length, although that movie had multiple problems that additional footage probably won't do much to solve.

    Thus far, I've only purchased the first Superman on DVD because it's only one with a 5.1 soundtrack (and a 5.0 DD isolated track of Williams' amazing score) and a good set of supplemental features. If these special editions come out, I would probably pick up Superman II because at a minimum it will now have a 5.1 soundtrack and some new supplementals. But, if the Donner director's cut (or even the rough cut scenes) is included, it's a definite must-buy.

  8. #8
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    317
    Looks sweet, Lex! Hell, I might even be tempted to watch Forever & Batman & Robin! You're right, even these installments are far superior to the latter Superman flicks.

  9. #9
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    317
    Yeah, Woochifer, Superman the Movie had a very classic, innocent comic book feel. But not in a "kiddy" way, if that makes sense. More of a nastalga thing. I think Sam Raimi borrowed a bit from Donner for Spiderman.

  10. #10
    Resident DVD Reviewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    Quote Originally Posted by Defshep
    Looks sweet, Lex! Hell, I might even be tempted to watch Forever & Batman & Robin! You're right, even these installments are far superior to the latter Superman flicks.
    Absolutely agreed, Def. And yes, these titles WILL be available for purchase separately, much like what MGM did with The Amityville Horror Collection box set, where you could buy each disc individually or the entire set; I can't wait to get these remastered Batman discs into my player for review of their DTS tracks if for nothing but that......

    If Superman II is released as a Special Edition, with some kind of remastered audio and video (hopefully a souped up Dolby Digital 5.1 track or, wishful thinking, DTS), I will definitely pick that up as I always thought of Superman II as one of the best super hero film sequels along with Spider-Man 2; well, there weren't that many others to choose from in THAT category.......

  11. #11
    Forum Regular Woochifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    6,883
    Quote Originally Posted by Defshep
    Yeah, Woochifer, Superman the Movie had a very classic, innocent comic book feel. But not in a "kiddy" way, if that makes sense. More of a nastalga thing. I think Sam Raimi borrowed a bit from Donner for Spiderman.
    In the commentary track on Superman, I recall Richard Donner noting that he tried to convey more of a wide-eyed nostalgic feel to the movie, and he seemed emotionally attached to the movie. Just the opening sequence with the curtains and the black & white footage established some of the Rockwellesque imagery. Also, the tagline in the ad campaign for that movie was "You'll believe a man can fly," and at that time, the flying effects were considered state-of-the-art (and apparently expensive to produce). A movie this enamored with something as "simple" as flying and as free of cynicism as this one unfortunately might not play with today's audiences, who seem more jaded. You're right though in that Spider-man also seemed to have a nostalgic feel.

  12. #12
    Da Dragonball Kid L.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Posted in da cut
    Posts
    3,577
    Woochifer,
    You mentioned that the first two Batman titles had a DD track with a low bitrate. I have the first two titles and I'm wondering how would one know that they're a lower bitrate?

    What exactly should I be watching out for?

  13. #13
    Forum Regular Woochifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    6,883
    Quote Originally Posted by L.J.
    Woochifer,
    You mentioned that the first two Batman titles had a DD track with a low bitrate. I have the first two titles and I'm wondering how would one know that they're a lower bitrate?

    What exactly should I be watching out for?
    Unfortunately, you generally don't know which version of DD is used until you buy/rent the disc and run it through a media player/processor that can display the media tag information.

    Most of Warner's earliest titles were encoded with the reduced bitrate on the DD audio tracks, and at least the first Batman movie was in Warner's first batch of DVD titles. This was fairly common practice with the first batch of DVD releases, particularly those that used single layer discs, which need a lot of compression to fit a two-hour movie onto a single disc.

    The reduced bitrate version of DD is 384k, full bitrate version of DD is 448k, while two-channel DD uses a bitrate of 192k. The main difference between the 448k and 384k versions of DD is which frequency the soundtrack starts to economize on bits by channel joining. With the 448k version of DD, the channel joining starts at 15 kHz, while the 384k version starts channel joining at 10 kHz. By contrast, the reduced bitrate version of DTS has a resolution of 768k, while the full bitrate version goes 1.5k, all with no channel joining.

    I don't know of any brand new releases that have come out in the past couple of years that use the reduced bitrate DD, but some newer special edition reissues of titles that had previously come out on DVD have reused the 384k DD tracks from the previous DVD release. Examples of newer special edition DVDs that carried over the 384k DD tracks from the previous release include JFK, The Fugitive, and Heat. Some DVD reviews might mention this information, but none of the review sites I'm aware of systematically post the audio bitrates.

  14. #14
    Da Dragonball Kid L.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Posted in da cut
    Posts
    3,577
    Quote Originally Posted by Woochifer
    Unfortunately, you generally don't know which version of DD is used until you buy/rent the disc and run it through a media player/processor that can display the media tag information.

    Most of Warner's earliest titles were encoded with the reduced bitrate on the DD audio tracks, and at least the first Batman movie was in Warner's first batch of DVD titles. This was fairly common practice with the first batch of DVD releases, particularly those that used single layer discs, which need a lot of compression to fit a two-hour movie onto a single disc.

    The reduced bitrate version of DD is 384k, full bitrate version of DD is 448k, while two-channel DD uses a bitrate of 192k. The main difference between the 448k and 384k versions of DD is which frequency the soundtrack starts to economize on bits by channel joining. With the 448k version of DD, the channel joining starts at 15 kHz, while the 384k version starts channel joining at 10 kHz. By contrast, the reduced bitrate version of DTS has a resolution of 768k, while the full bitrate version goes 1.5k, all with no channel joining.

    I don't know of any brand new releases that have come out in the past couple of years that use the reduced bitrate DD, but some newer special edition reissues of titles that had previously come out on DVD have reused the 384k DD tracks from the previous DVD release. Examples of newer special edition DVDs that carried over the 384k DD tracks from the previous release include JFK, The Fugitive, and Heat. Some DVD reviews might mention this information, but none of the review sites I'm aware of systematically post the audio bitrates.
    Interesting. This is good information. Information like this should be on the back of every DVD case. I try to seek out DTS as much as possible.

    My brother recently started getting into HT and I advised him to search out DVD's encoded with DTS. He asked why all DVD's were'nt in DTS. Is there an answer for that question?

  15. #15
    Forum Regular Woochifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    6,883
    Quote Originally Posted by L.J.
    Interesting. This is good information. Information like this should be on the back of every DVD case. I try to seek out DTS as much as possible.

    My brother recently started getting into HT and I advised him to search out DVD's encoded with DTS. He asked why all DVD's were'nt in DTS. Is there an answer for that question?
    Two simple answers -- disc space and standards

    DD takes up far less room on a disc, and with all of these competing demands on the available bits on a DVD, the DTS soundtrack is not always included. Typically, most of the disc space goes to video, and then you need space for the DD audio track, and THEN you need to carve out more space for any bonus features or commentary tracks. Only after all of that content has been accounted for, then a DTS track might get included. Most DVDs nowadays are still single disc issues, so space allocation decisions need to be weighed from title to title, and there's often no rhyme or reason to which DVDs get DTS and which ones don't.

    And yet another twist on this issue is that there are two varieties of DTS out there -- a half bitrate version and a full bitrate version. The full bitrate version came out first and only made its way onto a few DVDs. Most studios veered away from DTS because the full bitrate version took up so much disc space. Universal and Dreamworks were the only studios that put out DVDs with the full bitrate DTS tracks (mostly because Universal is part-owner of DTS and they distribute Dreamworks' DVDs). Those DVDs are now hard to find, and were predominantly movie-only titles with no supplementals, foreign language, or commentary tracks.

    Only when a half bitrate version got introduced in 2000 did the number of DVDs with DTS tracks increase. The full bitrate DTS can sound superlative with music especially, and some concert DVDs and DVD-A titles include the 1.5k DTS tracks. Nowadays, virtually all movies with DTS soundtracks use the half bitrate version.

    With the DVD standard, the audio track must follow one of two audio standards, neither of which are DTS. Compressed multichannel Dolby Digital and noncompressed two-channel PCM are the standard audio formats mandated for DVDs. DTS is only an optional audio track.

  16. #16
    Da Dragonball Kid L.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Posted in da cut
    Posts
    3,577
    Quote Originally Posted by Woochifer
    Two simple answers -- disc space and standards

    DD takes up far less room on a disc, and with all of these competing demands on the available bits on a DVD, the DTS soundtrack is not always included. Typically, most of the disc space goes to video, and then you need space for the DD audio track, and THEN you need to carve out more space for any bonus features or commentary tracks. Only after all of that content has been accounted for, then a DTS track might get included. Most DVDs nowadays are still single disc issues, so space allocation decisions need to be weighed from title to title, and there's often no rhyme or reason to which DVDs get DTS and which ones don't.

    And yet another twist on this issue is that there are two varieties of DTS out there -- a half bitrate version and a full bitrate version. The full bitrate version came out first and only made its way onto a few DVDs. Most studios veered away from DTS because the full bitrate version took up so much disc space. Universal and Dreamworks were the only studios that put out DVDs with the full bitrate DTS tracks (mostly because Universal is part-owner of DTS and they distribute Dreamworks' DVDs). Those DVDs are now hard to find, and were predominantly movie-only titles with no supplementals, foreign language, or commentary tracks.

    Only when a half bitrate version got introduced in 2000 did the number of DVDs with DTS tracks increase. The full bitrate DTS can sound superlative with music especially, and some concert DVDs and DVD-A titles include the 1.5k DTS tracks. Nowadays, virtually all movies with DTS soundtracks use the half bitrate version.

    With the DVD standard, the audio track must follow one of two audio standards, neither of which are DTS. Compressed multichannel Dolby Digital and noncompressed two-channel PCM are the standard audio formats mandated for DVDs. DTS is only an optional audio track.
    Thanks for the reply. It all makes sense. I'll be able to explain all this to my bro. the next time it comes up.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •