Jeffrey N
09-29-2004, 09:06 AM
After 4 years as the unstatisfied owner of a Yamaha RXV 2095 HT receiver, I have decided to take the plunge and upgrade.
My search for the perfect HT receiver (within reasonable financial limits of course) has led me to a choice between three units that all sound pretty good to my ears:
The Rotel RSX 1067, the Arcam AVR 300 and the Denon AVR 3805. Actually, I am leaning towards purchasing the Rotel, but all three, like women of subtly different but equally alluring qualities, are keeping me interested in their respective ways.
Like my choice of a wife, I recognize that I am looking for a long term commitment and I do not want to make my decision rashly and ultimately end up having to pay for a costly divorce and replacement unit :)
My speakers are B & W DM 602 Series 2's with the matching LCR6 S2 as a Centre. Rears are cheap old Mission shelf tops. I also have a DBox David 302 Subwoofer and a Toshiba SD5700 DVD Player (progressive scan).
My musical tastes lean toward classical and jazz. But I would also want my system to pound out Jeff Beck and Santana with authority and realism.
My biggest complaint about the Yamaha amp was that, although the music it played always sounded clean and precise, I never felt that it could accurately convey the 3 D musical image that a receiver of its cost should have been capable of producing.
I plan to replace my fronts with B&W CM 6's at some point as I do not like the B&W 703's (they do not sound warm enough).
Finally, I listen more to music than watch movies, maybe to a ration of 80% to 20%.
Which of the three named units should I pick over the others for my long-term commitment and why?
Thank you for your responses.
Jeffrey N, Toronto.
My search for the perfect HT receiver (within reasonable financial limits of course) has led me to a choice between three units that all sound pretty good to my ears:
The Rotel RSX 1067, the Arcam AVR 300 and the Denon AVR 3805. Actually, I am leaning towards purchasing the Rotel, but all three, like women of subtly different but equally alluring qualities, are keeping me interested in their respective ways.
Like my choice of a wife, I recognize that I am looking for a long term commitment and I do not want to make my decision rashly and ultimately end up having to pay for a costly divorce and replacement unit :)
My speakers are B & W DM 602 Series 2's with the matching LCR6 S2 as a Centre. Rears are cheap old Mission shelf tops. I also have a DBox David 302 Subwoofer and a Toshiba SD5700 DVD Player (progressive scan).
My musical tastes lean toward classical and jazz. But I would also want my system to pound out Jeff Beck and Santana with authority and realism.
My biggest complaint about the Yamaha amp was that, although the music it played always sounded clean and precise, I never felt that it could accurately convey the 3 D musical image that a receiver of its cost should have been capable of producing.
I plan to replace my fronts with B&W CM 6's at some point as I do not like the B&W 703's (they do not sound warm enough).
Finally, I listen more to music than watch movies, maybe to a ration of 80% to 20%.
Which of the three named units should I pick over the others for my long-term commitment and why?
Thank you for your responses.
Jeffrey N, Toronto.