MindGoneHaywire
08-25-2004, 01:59 PM
All right, who watched this? I sat through a lot of it & thought it was mostly awful. I especially remember a few acts that stood out as being particularly bad--The Cars, Tom Petty, Madonna...and Dylan's closing with Keith Richards & Ron Wood who didn't seem to have any idea what the old man was doing. Hey, don't tell me he was only 40-something. He was the oldest 40-something I've ever seen.
At the time, as now, I try to understand the philosophy of stacking the bill with the biggest acts in the world, yet wonder why they couldn't have snuck just a few lesser-known artists on there that would've provided, perhaps, just a bit more punch. There were a few acts on the UK side whose sets I didn't see that I'm mildly curious to check out--the Style Council, Bryan Ferry, Ultravox, etc. I have about as much interest in sitting through sets by Bryan Adams, Patti Labelle, and REO Speedwagon as I do in hearing Britney Spears debate politics with Jessica Simpson...hold on a second, that doesn't sound all that bad, actually...
I've heard people rave about the UK sets by Queen & David Bowie...and overall there's plenty of interest on here. Amongst my favorite bands of the 80s? Not one presence, not even friggin' close. The one concession on the US side to a relatively unknown, up-and-coming band was the Hooters. I don't see them listed on the DVD. Now, this isn't something I'd pay for, but I would rent it, not that I'm likely to have a chance since it is of course for charity. But I don't think I know one person who's interested in watching this enough to actually spend the money on it.
Why Led Zeppelin would refuse to allow their footage to be included is beyond me. I remember Jimmy Page, inebriated to the point where he couldn't speak...but if Dylan was willing to allow a piece of his set to be included, then where the hell do they get off? I mean, it's for charity & all. Classless move, I say. Anyone surprised?
http://www.undercover.com.au/news/2004/aug04/20040825_liveaid.html
At the time, as now, I try to understand the philosophy of stacking the bill with the biggest acts in the world, yet wonder why they couldn't have snuck just a few lesser-known artists on there that would've provided, perhaps, just a bit more punch. There were a few acts on the UK side whose sets I didn't see that I'm mildly curious to check out--the Style Council, Bryan Ferry, Ultravox, etc. I have about as much interest in sitting through sets by Bryan Adams, Patti Labelle, and REO Speedwagon as I do in hearing Britney Spears debate politics with Jessica Simpson...hold on a second, that doesn't sound all that bad, actually...
I've heard people rave about the UK sets by Queen & David Bowie...and overall there's plenty of interest on here. Amongst my favorite bands of the 80s? Not one presence, not even friggin' close. The one concession on the US side to a relatively unknown, up-and-coming band was the Hooters. I don't see them listed on the DVD. Now, this isn't something I'd pay for, but I would rent it, not that I'm likely to have a chance since it is of course for charity. But I don't think I know one person who's interested in watching this enough to actually spend the money on it.
Why Led Zeppelin would refuse to allow their footage to be included is beyond me. I remember Jimmy Page, inebriated to the point where he couldn't speak...but if Dylan was willing to allow a piece of his set to be included, then where the hell do they get off? I mean, it's for charity & all. Classless move, I say. Anyone surprised?
http://www.undercover.com.au/news/2004/aug04/20040825_liveaid.html