Another Math problem [Archive] - Audio & Video Forums

PDA

View Full Version : Another Math problem



StevenSurprenant
01-27-2012, 04:56 AM
Here's another math problem for everyone to enjoy.

If you can't read it - I wrote it out below...

JohnMichael
01-27-2012, 05:14 AM
Here's another math problem for everyone to enjoy.



I am unable to see it. Hopefully I can with my iPhone. I think others will also have trouble.

noddin0ff
01-27-2012, 05:36 AM
Unless there's a joke I'm missing... Line 3 where they /-A^2 on one side but not the other. At that point both sides are not equal. You plug in the values and you have

1*5 - 1*4 = (5^2 - 2*4*5 + 4^2) / -4^2

1 = (25 - 40 +16) / 16

1 = 1/16

wrong.

StevenSurprenant
01-27-2012, 06:13 AM
I am unable to see it. Hopefully I can with my iPhone. I think others will also have trouble.

Maybe this will be better?

I'll explain the problem later after everyone interested has a chance to figure it out.

ForeverAutumn
01-27-2012, 06:52 AM
I can't see it either. Can you just type it out?

StevenSurprenant
01-27-2012, 07:32 AM
Let
A=4
B=5
C=1

Equation
C = B – A

[ *(B-A) ]
C(B-A) = (B-A)^2
CB – CA = B^2 – 2AB + A^2

[ -A^2 ]
CB – CA – A^2 = B^2 – 2AB + A^2 – A^2
CB – CA – A^2 = B^2 – 2AB

[ +AB ]
AB + CB – CA – A^2 = B^2 – 2AB +AB
AB + CB – CA – A^2 = B^2 – AB

[ -CB ]
AB + CB – CA – A^2 - CB = B^2 – AB - CB
AB – CA – A^2 = B^2 – CB - AB

[ Factor ]
AB – CA – A^2 = B^2 – CB – AB
A(B – C – A) = B(B – C – A)

[ /(B – C – A) ]
(A(B – C – A)) / (B – C – A) = (B(B – C – A)) / (B – C – A)
A = B

4 = 5
2 X 2 =5

Maybe now it can be read?
I did a few more steps to clarify the process.
Have at it!

StevenSurprenant
01-27-2012, 07:44 AM
Checking the solution in reverse...

A(B-C-A)=B(B-C-A)
AB-AC-A^2=B^2-BC-AB
AB-A^2-B^2+AB=AC-BC
AB-A^2-B^2+AB=C(A-B)
C=(2AB-A^2-B^2)/(A-B)
C=(2AB-A^2-B^2)/(A-B) =(A-B)(B-A)/(A-B)
C=B-A

...which is the original equation

noddin0ff
01-27-2012, 08:56 AM
Aha! got it.

You can't do the last step which is to divide by (B-A-C) because B-C-A = 0

You can't divide by zero, because it has no meaning. Hence the nonsensical conclusion 4=5

good one!

StevenSurprenant
01-27-2012, 01:44 PM
Aha! got it.

You can't do the last step which is to divide by (B-A-C) because B-C-A = 0

You can't divide by zero, because it has no meaning. Hence the nonsensical conclusion 4=5

good one!

A=4
B=5
C=1

The initial Equation C = B – A works for the supplied constants and also works for A(B – C – A) = B(B – C – A) , but, as you said, not for (A(B – C – A)) / (B – C – A) = (B(B – C – A)) / (B – C – A)

However,

[ /(B – C – A) ]
(A(B – C – A)) / (B – C – A) = (B(B – C – A)) / (B – C – A)
A = B

Is still algebraically correct, but not with the supplied solution set which does work for the initial equation.

In other words: C = B - A is not the same as A(B – C – A) = B(B – C – A).

You're getting close... Now the question is why?

StevenSurprenant
01-29-2012, 05:21 AM
There doesn't seem to be much interest in this post, so I will post the explanation for those that are.

Extraneous and missing solutions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraneous_and_missing_solutions)

Scroll down to: "Extraneous solutions: multiplication"

Case closed!

ForeverAutumn
01-29-2012, 06:20 AM
Sorry. I'm interested, I just haven't had time to sit down and focus on this. It's a busy weekend.

StevenSurprenant
01-29-2012, 08:18 AM
Sorry. I'm interested, I just haven't had time to sit down and focus on this. It's a busy weekend.

I enjoyed your post, that's why I posted this. I didn't reply to your post because several members solved it and I didn't want to give away the solution. Anyway, I found it fun.

noddin0ff
01-30-2012, 05:56 AM
I guess I don't get the nuance. If the initial equation C = B - A is true, then the value of (B - A - C) is necessarily zero for any values that satisfy C = B - A

I guess what Wiki is saying is that the problem was just a step prior to dividing by (B-A-C) and was really when the equation was arranged to multiply both sides by (B-A-C). As soon as you multiply both side by zero all bets are off?

StevenSurprenant
01-30-2012, 07:31 AM
I guess I don't get the nuance. If the initial equation C = B - A is true, then the value of (B - A - C) is necessarily zero for any values that satisfy C = B - A

I guess what Wiki is saying is that the problem was just a step prior to dividing by (B-A-C) and was really when the equation was arranged to multiply both sides by (B-A-C). As soon as you multiply both side by zero all bets are off?

Multiplying both sides by zero is valid, but when you try to factor out (in the last step) (B-C-A) you get an error since you can't divide by zero.

This only occurs with the given values of A=4, B=5, C=1 which is a valid solution for the original equation and the step A(B – C – A) = B(B – C – A), but become invalid (with the initial solution set) when you try to factor out (B-C-A) in the final step.

If you were to graph the solution set for the original equation C=B-A and A(B – C – A) = B(B – C – A), you would find that they have different solution sets so C=B-A is not equivalent to A(B – C – A) = B(B – C – A)

A(B – C – A) = B(B – C – A) solution set is confined to values that only equal zero for (B – C – A), hence this solution set is invalid for the last step to be valid (division by zero)

BestMarcoyng
02-19-2012, 10:02 AM
Hello there,

I'm Mua Chung. I am coming from Vietnam. Happy to become a member of forums.audioreview.com community. I would like to socialize as well as learn from the experts here.