Plasma vs. projector dilemma [Archive] - Audio & Video Forums

PDA

View Full Version : Plasma vs. projector dilemma



audio amateur
10-07-2010, 12:16 AM
I've finally collected the cash to get this 'home theater' thing started, I just need the screen now. And a PS3:D

My 4.1 setup is in my bedroom, and currently uses a 32" SD widescreen. I've had my mind set on a projector and more specifically on an Optoma HD20 (1080p), which has a short throw lens that produces a big screen from a small distance.

Problem is, I dont have many placement options. If i have it mounted on the rear wall just above the couch, it will project a 74" screen or so. The viewing distance will be the same as the projector lens-screen distance, about 8 feet. Seeing as I'll be watch a lot of SD, at first anyway, would 74 inches be overkill?

I could also go with a 50" plasma, which would be about a foot nearer the viewer. 50" is all I can afford if I go with a plasma.

So the question is, does upscaling really help make SD video acceptable at HD viewing distances on an HD screen, or is it not sufficient to allow such close viewing?
I suppose I could set the projector on a coffee table in front of the couch, but then the screen size would only be a little bigger than that of a 50" plasma.

I'll mostly be SD/HD gaming, watching DVDs and soon Blu and possibly HD tv.
I'd appreciate knowing what you guys think. Any more info just ask me
Thanks!
oh last question, do I need to worry about lip sych? Ill be using tosling to my AV amp (wont accept HDMI)

Tarheel_
10-07-2010, 04:10 AM
a lot of questions here...i can answer some from a projector standpoint as I'm going on my 5th or so year with one.

consider this when placing a projector (or just considering one)
- noise..they vary somewhat, but all of them can be heard when the sound is low
- heat...projectors produce ungodly amounts of it...enough to help warm a room
- slow start up/shut down times...bulbs must warm and bulbs must cool so the fan runs even after shutdown (usually 15-30 secs). This can be irritating.
- how often will you use it? Meaning the number of start up/shut down equates to bulb life. The more cycles, the less bulb life

You are on the right track as far as placement concerns. Too close and your eyes will suffer fatigue. I believe projectorcentral.com has a wonderful tool to check for optimal distance.

Personally, I would not go with placing a projector on a table. Unless you really really want the larger screen, it seems much more convenient to go with a plasma.

Sir Terrence the Terrible
10-07-2010, 09:34 AM
I've finally collected the cash to get this 'home theater' thing started, I just need the screen now. And a PS3:D

My 4.1 setup is in my bedroom, and currently uses a 32" SD widescreen. I've had my mind set on a projector and more specifically on an Optoma HD20 (1080p), which has a short throw lens that produces a big screen from a small distance.

Problem is, I dont have many placement options. If i have it mounted on the rear wall just above the couch, it will project a 74" screen or so. The viewing distance will be the same as the projector lens-screen distance, about 8 feet. Seeing as I'll be watch a lot of SD, at first anyway, would 74 inches be overkill?

Definitely it would be an overkill, especially if you are watching a lot of SD material.




The answer to this question is an absolute no! Upscaling does not change the fundamental here, it is still just 480i resolution. Upscaling just smoothen's things to give a more film like appearance and that is all it does. It does not change the resolution of the source one bit.

[quote]I'll mostly be SD/HD gaming, watching DVDs and soon Blu and possibly HD tv.
I'd appreciate knowing what you guys think. Any more info just ask me
Thanks!
oh last question, do I need to worry about lip sych? Ill be using tosling to my AV amp (wont accept HDMI)

Based on the information you have given, the 50" plasma is your best bet. You don't need to worry about lip sync because the toslink connect just takes the core from either audio format.

pixelthis
10-08-2010, 09:58 AM
I've finally collected the cash to get this 'home theater' thing started, I just need the screen now. And a PS3:D

My 4.1 setup is in my bedroom, and currently uses a 32" SD widescreen. I've had my mind set on a projector and more specifically on an Optoma HD20 (1080p), which has a short throw lens that produces a big screen from a small distance.

Problem is, I dont have many placement options. If i have it mounted on the rear wall just above the couch, it will project a 74" screen or so. The viewing distance will be the same as the projector lens-screen distance, about 8 feet. Seeing as I'll be watch a lot of SD, at first anyway, would 74 inches be overkill?

I could also go with a 50" plasma, which would be about a foot nearer the viewer. 50" is all I can afford if I go with a plasma.

So the question is, does upscaling really help make SD video acceptable at HD viewing distances on an HD screen, or is it not sufficient to allow such close viewing?
I suppose I could set the projector on a coffee table in front of the couch, but then the screen size would only be a little bigger than that of a 50" plasma.

I'll mostly be SD/HD gaming, watching DVDs and soon Blu and possibly HD tv.
I'd appreciate knowing what you guys think. Any more info just ask me
Thanks!
oh last question, do I need to worry about lip sych? Ill be using tosling to my AV amp (wont accept HDMI)

A bedroom is too small for a projector, usually.
I hate plasma, its basically a squished CRT, has a plasma because a glass envelope
that could hold a vacuum in that configuration would weigh a quarter ton, at least.
But if you must, its your dime and your poison. But a flat panel, either plasma or lcd,
is the way to go.
ALSO CONSIDER DLP, it is far and away the best way to get a humongous screen
in a pocket theater.
I viewed one, six feet away, 60", with a 17" cabinet, and it looked fantastic.
Cheap also. BUT GET THE WARRANTY, because it includes your first replacement blub.
Also, "upscaling wont increase your res, but it could make a SD pic seem smoother.:1:

http://www.mitsubishi-tv.com/theater.html

Smokey
10-08-2010, 10:48 PM
ALSO CONSIDER DLP, it is far and away the best way to get a humongous screen in a pocket theater. I viewed one, six feet away, 60", with a 17" cabinet, and it looked fantastic.

Cheap also. BUT GET THE WARRANTY, because it includes your first replacement blub.

Man, you are all over the place.

You hound Rich for owning a DLP and you said "These sets are like whiskey, they are made to sell, not use."

And here you are recommending one. In politics that is called flip-floping :blush2:

audio amateur
10-09-2010, 12:36 AM
Man, you are all over the place.

You hound Rich for owning a DLP and you said "These sets are like whiskey, they are made to sell, not use."

And here you are recommending one. In politics that is called flip-floping :blush2:
You can't take him too seriously:) He's also been a prominent 'hater' of Plasmas but he just said I could go with one:)

audio amateur
10-09-2010, 12:38 AM
Pix, thanks for your recommendations. Are DLPs those big rear projection screens? Here in France, I haven't really seen any...

Poultrygeist
10-09-2010, 03:02 AM
DLPs are much thinner than those monster rear projection sets like my 46 inch Hitachi from 2003. The Samsung DLPs were expensive when they first hit the market but a cheaper alternative to the early plasmas.

About the only advantages I have with the Hitachi is that I can sit a huge center speaker on top of it and the HD picture is still decent. I have to use an HDMI to DVI cable with it. I'm hoping the beast will die soon so I can justify a thin screen.

When Circuit City went under last year I picked up one of their free standing commercial display stands which sits in my attic waiting for the Hitachi to expire. The stand is adjustable up and down and will accept any size flat screen but since it's free standing you can use any size audio cabinet underneath.

pixelthis
10-09-2010, 09:37 AM
Man, you are all over the place.

You hound Rich for owning a DLP and you said "These sets are like whiskey, they are made to sell, not use."

And here you are recommending one. In politics that is called flip-floping :blush2:

I GOT onto Rich because he worshiped at the feet of T.I.
dlp HAS ITS PROBLEMS, but with the advent of LED in some models, there is a slight chance they might find a niche. And they do tend to be rather fragil, hence the whiskey comment.
But their picture is fantastic, and for the starving videophile they can't be beat. I saw one
on HSN . an 80" model, for less than 1800 bucks. The bang for buck cant be beat, with a 60"
model selling for less than a grand in some places. WHEN THEY COST MORE they werent
worth the risk, but at todays fire sale prices, compact cabinets (17" wide), and really
good picture they make more and more sense all of the time. For a smaller room
where a projector is not viable they are perfect, with a 60" being almost 400 bucks
cheaper than the cheapest 55" I have seen.
AND I am not "recommending one, I AM RECOMMENDING consideration of one.
SOME MIGHT be willing to put up with the shortcomings of the form factor for the
advantages gained. THE GUYS LOOKING for options, heres a viable option I actually
think that they are no good for most, but some might find one interesting. AND ANYTHINGS BETTER THAN PLASMA.
I hate plasma.:1:

pixelthis
10-09-2010, 09:51 AM
Pix, thanks for your recommendations. Are DLPs those big rear projection screens? Here in France, I haven't really seen any...

THEY ARE 17" wide on average, and are whats called a "micro projector" form factor.
Some of the newer models have an LED bulb for light, most have a projector type
bulb that lasts about three years. THEY ARE MONOCHROMATIC, so they have a spinning
wheel that gives the colors. THE ADVANTAGE is that they are a big screen on the cheap,
with none of the problems of front projectors. And of the new type video displays their
picture tends to be best, with none of the refresh rate problems of LCD, and none of the
problems of plasma(burn in, dim pic, you name it). And they can be a bit fragile. But
MITSUBISHI makes a pretty high q product. I DONT recommend anyone buy one, but I
think you were looking for options, and this option is often overlooked, and needs to be examined. I like them because of the large size for the price, I have always loved a large screen. But the chances of survival for this form factor is slight, everybody wants a
sexy flatscreen, and its easier to get the wifey to go along with one of those.
AND if you absolutely have to get a plasma, get a PANNY, BTW(UGH).:1: