hershon
04-04-2004, 07:27 AM
My ears tell me one thing and reviews of home theaters seem to tell me something else. I have an average size living room and my main speakers and subwoofers are about 9 feet from the couch and the back (surround) speakers about 3-4 feet from the center of couch on both sides.
I listen to mainly CD reissues of 60/70's rock music (in fact I, 10 years ago used to produce in my spare time some members of name 60's English rock bands - so I have great ears but my techncal knowledge on sound/speakers isn't great if that makes any sense). Here are a few questions I hope someone can give me their opinion on as I don't want to spend extra money on a new system if its not really necessary. To begin with, in terms of sound quality (not loudness per se) if I'm listening to music 10 feet away in a living room in an apartment, am I actually going to notice a difference in the sound quality of a (60/70's) rock CD played on my 200 watt system as opposed to a 600 watt system? I played a Free CD in a 600 watt Yamaha System (that I brought with me to Best Buy) and I noticed little to no difference in the sound quality from what I hear of the same CD on my 200 watt system. Is this my imagination, or is their really no difference if I'm playing something at a normal loud volume for myself rather than trying to blast something in a 400 foot room for a bunch of people? I also brought with me a DVD of Eric Burdon's Animals recorded last year or so and again, I noticed no significant difference in the picture or the sound. Yamaha seems to be highly rated and my Koss C220 which goes for $300 (I got it for $150 on EBAY) seems to be rated poorly, yet I did not notice any significant improvement on DVD's and Cd's played on the highly rated more expensive system. The only feature my Koss C-220 is missing is a DTS decoder (the DVD receiver has something for DTS but it can't play DTS unless I have a DTS decoder which doesn't make any sense to me. The bottom line is, should I upgrade to a more expensive home theater system when I don't notice any significant difference on my cheap system? Any advice is appreciated. Thanks
I listen to mainly CD reissues of 60/70's rock music (in fact I, 10 years ago used to produce in my spare time some members of name 60's English rock bands - so I have great ears but my techncal knowledge on sound/speakers isn't great if that makes any sense). Here are a few questions I hope someone can give me their opinion on as I don't want to spend extra money on a new system if its not really necessary. To begin with, in terms of sound quality (not loudness per se) if I'm listening to music 10 feet away in a living room in an apartment, am I actually going to notice a difference in the sound quality of a (60/70's) rock CD played on my 200 watt system as opposed to a 600 watt system? I played a Free CD in a 600 watt Yamaha System (that I brought with me to Best Buy) and I noticed little to no difference in the sound quality from what I hear of the same CD on my 200 watt system. Is this my imagination, or is their really no difference if I'm playing something at a normal loud volume for myself rather than trying to blast something in a 400 foot room for a bunch of people? I also brought with me a DVD of Eric Burdon's Animals recorded last year or so and again, I noticed no significant difference in the picture or the sound. Yamaha seems to be highly rated and my Koss C220 which goes for $300 (I got it for $150 on EBAY) seems to be rated poorly, yet I did not notice any significant improvement on DVD's and Cd's played on the highly rated more expensive system. The only feature my Koss C-220 is missing is a DTS decoder (the DVD receiver has something for DTS but it can't play DTS unless I have a DTS decoder which doesn't make any sense to me. The bottom line is, should I upgrade to a more expensive home theater system when I don't notice any significant difference on my cheap system? Any advice is appreciated. Thanks