cd versus transport and external DAC

[Bigmoney]

Hello, my system is all but complete except for one major weakness, my source. I have nice brand new rotel separates (1080/1070) and b and w speakers. However, my source is a marantz 3002 dvd player. I heard the marantz 5001 and it sounded much much better in my system when I demo'd it. Therefore I know a good source will truly help my system. I planneed on purchasing the marantz 5001 for 300. Everyone seems to agree the marantz is the best budget player or atleast among the best. But, I wonder if I was to use an external DAC and my dvd as a transport could I achieve better sound for the same price. My question is, if I spent 300 on an external DAC would it out perform the marantz 5001 in using my dvd as a transport. It makes perfect sense that I could achieve better sound for the same price because after all the marantz for 300 includes the DAC among other parts which leads me to believe a DAC for the same price would be better because the marantz DAC must be of lesser quality to meet the 300 dollar price point. Considering the other parts and devices that must going into building the whole player.

[thekid]

Big$

I can only speak from my experience since I was in the same situation recently. I researched DAC's and with the urging of several members here decided to go with a budget DAC over a similiarly priced CDP.

From strictly a SQ standpoint I found the DAC a definite improvement from my older CDP's. It may be strictly because of the quality of my CDP players who knows, but at certain price levels I think the DAC/transport combo is going to be better than most CDP's that cost the same. Also I think if you look at it from a budget/long-term perspective the DAC route also makes alot of sense. I am not sure of the lifespan of your average DAC but my guess is that it is longer than your average CDP. If the CDP which is only the transport breaks down you can replace it relatively cheaply and keep going. Spend alot on a CDP upgrade and if it goes you are back to square one.

[Bigmoney]

I agree with what your saying. It makes perfect sense to me that a 300 dollar dac will outperform a 300 dollar cdp. However, I have heard some mention that DAC'S are not worth it until you get into the pricy ones. I am sure that any budget dac will be better than my 200 dollar dvd player. Does everyone agree.

[Ajani]

In theory a $300 DAC should be a better upgrade than a $300 CD Player (Ignoring things like jitter).... BUT the issue is whether you can find a really good DAC at that price range (maybe on the used market, but I'm not sure about new)... In the $300 CD price range Marantz, NAD & Cambridge Audio have the market locked down and for good reason.... but in the $300 DAC price range??? Are there any good brands competing there?

If I was in your position, I'd probably save up some more money to get into the $700+ CD Player range and get either a Rotel RCD1070 or Arcam CD73T.... Or look to upgrade my speakers first....

[thekid]

I agree with what your saying. It makes perfect sense to me that a 300 dollar dac will outperform a 300 dollar cdp. However, I have heard some mention that DAC'S are not worth it until you get into the pricy ones. I am sure that any budget dac will be better than my 200 dollar dvd player. Does everyone agree.

You might be right I can only speak based on my budget/equipment. I got a MSB-Link DAC II for about $280. Is the latest and greatest DAC no. Was it upgrade over my Pioneer and Denon 80's-90's CDP's yes. Is there a great CDP player for less than $400 that will outplay a DAC maybe? As you go up the line it cost then I think the differences might become more noticeable, when you get to their very top of the line the line might blur again. I think you need to look at what is available for your budget and then make the decision based on the available options for either a DAC or CDP

[Bigmoney]

Everyone speaks highly of the rotel 1070 cdp.....is it that much better than the marantz 5001. That is, worth doubling the cost of the marantz 5001 and then some.........?

[blackraven]

BM, save your money and go with the Marantz SA8001 SACDP as I mentioned to you earlier in another post. Its a stereophile class A rated CDP. Its got a great warm rich sound with very good low end on standard CD's and SACD. IMO, its the best CDP for under $1000 and can be found online for about $700 with free shipping. I wish I kept mine when I purchased the Cambridge 840c. Check out the review at www.stereophile.com

This CDP would be a good match for your system since you had complained about it being too bright or fatiguing.

[Ajani]

BM, save your money and go with the Marantz SA8001 SACDP as I mentioned to you earlier in another post. Its a stereophile class A rated CDP. Its got a great warm rich sound with very good low end on standard CD's and SACD. IMO, its the best CDP for under $1000 and can be found online for about $700 with free shipping. I wish I kept mine when I purchased the Cambridge 840c. Check out the review at www.stereophile.com

This CDP would be a good match for your system since you had complained about it being too bright or fatiguing.

That's an even better suggestion...

@BM - if you can raise your budget or shop around for a good deal, you can get into Stereophile Class A Rated CD Players/DACS... such as the Marantz SA8001, Rega Apollo & Bencmark DAC1....

[Bigmoney]

Thats a good idea. But would you really buy a 700 dollar cdp before upgrading your 600 dollar speakers.

[Ajani]

Thats a good idea. But would you really buy a 700 dollar cdp before upgrading your 600 dollar speakers.

:biggrin5:

I owned the Rotel combo you have, combined with Mission V63 floorstanders, a Marantz CD5001 CD Player, NAD C520bee CD Player(replaced with the Marantz), Panasonic DVD player and Apple Mac Mini... For me, the Marantz was the best of the 4 source options... but that said, the differences were hardly significant and I found that I did more listening using the Mac than either CD player or the DVD player....

So my point is that unless you are ready to invest in the $700+ range, I wouldn't suggest spending money on a dedicated CD player (unless you don't already have any digital source)...

In your position, I'd keep the Marantz DVD player and start saving for new speakers first and then get the $700+ CD player... or see if I could get my dealer to let me trade the Rotel RC1070 Pre/RB-1080Amp combo for a Rotel RA-1062 Integrated/RCD-1072 CD player combo and start saving for the speakers....

[Bigmoney]

I wonder though if the rotel integrated would be a big step down from my separates?

[Ajani]

I wonder though if the rotel integrated would be a big step down from my separates?

IMHO, In terms of power - yes... but otherwise - no....

[Bigmoney]

That sounds contradictory...........I thought more power= better sound. Are you saying the integrated should outperform my separates??

[Mr Peabody]

I personally am a source person. Nothing you will do down stream from that source will add to that signal any detail that isn't already there. If you don't extract it off the disc, or whatever, you will never hear it. Better speakers won't make you hear anything that isn't coming down the line, it has to already be there. The speaker is the last thing before escaping into the room. You have to begin at a good source and maintain the signal the best you can until it reaches the speakers. You said your self you heard a difference even with your $600.00 speakers, so get the new disc player and then save for speakers. I don't know of any good DAC's until you approach $1k. At least not new.

[Bigmoney]

I guess I am a bit skeptical..........you say there are no good dac's for under a thousand.........but you say a cd player such as the marantz 5001 or 8001, 300 and 800 dollars respectively would be a big improvement. That being said the DAC'S used in those components must cost less than the price of the component itself thereby being under one thousand dollars. Setting asde my skepticism, Mr. Peabody, you claim yourself to be a "source" proponent. This leads me to believe that you are the best person to take reccomendations from. Of the following please give your input, marantz 5001, music fidelity 25.2 (600$), marantz 800, rotel 1072 cdp, nad bee, oppo... I would only lay out the money for the 8001 if you could justify why it is worth the extra dough..... I will be leaving for college next year so I am tight with the money.

[Mr Peabody]

What I should have said is, I don't know of any outboard or separate DAC's under $1k. There may be even, I just haven't found them yet.

I'm sorry, I hate to weigh in on which player, I actually haven't heard any of those models personally. When going to unknown I lean toward the same brand for synergy sake but not always the best way to go. I like Ajani's suggestion of the Arcam 73t. The 73t you should find fast and very detailed for the money. I've heard various Arcam and Rotel, the 2 are opposite ends of the spectrum. I find Rotel polite and seemingly a bit slower pace where the Arcam is quite a livelier snappy type of presentation. But the 73t is getting into the 8001 territory. The best thing is to audition the brands you have available and select from that, a sure thing will probably be better than buying on our recs. If you don't have a Marantz dealer, www.amusicdirect.com will allow a 30 day return and sells Marantz.

Just curious if your system sounded bright when auditioning the 5001? You may find a better source can help that fatigue.

[Feanor]

What I should have said is, I don't know of any outboard or separate DAC's under $1k. There may be even, I just haven't found them yet.

....

It's when you get it ~$1k DACs look interesting, e.g. Benchmark, PS Audio, Monarchy M34, or for that matter, Cambridge 740C/840C. (Of these the 740C might be the best deal apart from the fact that it isn't USB.)

Under a grand you might as well buy a player unless you're interested in compter-source playback.

[Bigmoney]

Simply not interested in computer playback, but I understand what your saying about the outboard DAC'S now. Mr.peabody, the 5001 was definately a more warm sounding cdp and I would say that it did soften up my system a bit. Seemed like a pretty good player. My best knowledge tells me that the 5001 would be a big step up from my dvd player, that is worth the 300 bucks. I also believe that a player costing more would be better but a less dramatic step up than that from the low end dvd to the 5001. I am not sure that my speakers now dm 602 s3's are capable of discerning the differences?

[Ajani]

That sounds contradictory...........I thought more power= better sound. Are you saying the integrated should outperform my separates??

Nope, I never said that, nor was I implying it.... What I am saying is that IMHO, the difference between the Rotel integrated and the Rotel seperates is more power.... So the Integrated is just a less powerful version of what you have now.... It won't sound better, but unless you have really insensitive speakers and/or play at rock concert levels, then it probably won't sound any worse either....

But as I've suggested from back when you were considering buying the Amp/Pre combo, listen for yourself at the dealer (since your dealers should have both the combo and the integrated available) and decide for yourself....

With audio it's best to ask for a few suggestions and then go out and audition, we can't tell you what will sound good to you....

[Ajani]

Hello, my system is all but complete except for one major weakness, my source. I have nice brand new rotel separates (1080/1070) and b and w speakers. However, my source is a marantz 3002 dvd player. I heard the marantz 5001 and it sounded much much better in my system when I demo'd it. Therefore I know a good source will truly help my system.

Hmm, I just re-read your initial post and I think the part I've higlighted in bold is the answer to your problems.... Since you really liked the Marantz CD5001 in your system, then buy it....

[Bigmoney]

That's just it, I want to just buy the right thing. I have only heard one dedicated cdp, that being 5001 in my system. I haven't heard others, therefore for all I know others may sound better. I would really like to upgrade my speakers though. What do you think is a warm to neutral speaker under 1000?

[Mr Peabody]

I am the resident Dynaudio fanboy, I consider their speakers the apitomy of neutral. So this will make them very system dependent because they let you hear the weaknesses or strengthes of your system. Some people aren't ready for the truth to be revealed. You could get the Audience 52's for under $1k.

If you like your B&W's you could always go up in the line.

What lines do you have access to for audition?

[Bigmoney]

The only dealer nearby carries only b and w products....would it be fair to say you pay extra for the name? I can think of one other dealer which carries only focal, martin logan and polk.

[Mr Peabody]

Focal might be worth giving a listen. ML's aren't what I'd call "warm" but they are great speakers, you should go hear them just for the experience. Oh, and you can't afford any for $1k. Besides that, they are a lot to lug around if you will be moving a lot.

You might take a look at www.crutchfield.com who carry Thiel. They are a very sweet speaker. I just don't know where they start in price. Crutchfield will allow a 30 day return if not happy with your purchase.

You can see how John Michael feels about his Mobile Fidelity, if there are any left in stock www.amusicdirect.com were blowing those out at a good price. Again, 30 days.

[Ajani]

The only dealer nearby carries only b and w products....would it be fair to say you pay extra for the name? I can think of one other dealer which carries only focal, martin logan and polk.

I would suggest checking out the Focal 714V ($1K), they are floorstanders with a sound that is supposed to be similar to B&W, but less fatiguing at the high frequencies (I plan to test out some Focals later this year)...

Also, you can try the Magnepan MMG ($500) - Personally, I don't like the sound of Magnepan but way too many people love them for me not to suggest that you audition them - as you may like them as well...

Dynaudios (the ones mentioned by Mr. Peabody) - I find Dyns to be pretty much the opposite of B&W (and I don't like them either, but like Magnepan they are well loved and a must audition of you get the chance)....

Try these online sites, all of which offer return policies if you don't like the speakers:

www.audioadvisor.com

Has PSB & Energy

www.musicdirect.com

Has Focal, Epos & Mobile Fidelity

You have to audition different brands to really discover what's best for you....

[Bigmoney]

Ajani, what speakers are you a proponent of. You say you dislike many brands, I am curious as to which ones you do prefer. I plan to do some demoing when I get the free time as many places are not near me.

[Ajani]

Ajani, what speakers are you a proponent of. You say you dislike many brands, I am curious as to which ones you do prefer. I plan to do some demoing when I get the free time as many places are not near me.

My favourite brands so far are:

Monitor Audio
Mission
Final Sound (Electrostats)
Revel

[daviethek]

MMG's and a decent 12 inch sub and you are in mid-fi heaven. Your CD player dilemma will go away as you spend all your time complimenting your good taste in speakers. I tend to agree with the other folks who are talking about DAC's and CDP's. to get from a 5001 to an 8001 is a 500.00 jump and that appears to be the norm. Too bad the price point on fine players is around 1,000. I would have thought by now it would be much lower given the maturity of the technology. From what I have heard around here, the 5001 would be my first choice in a budget player.

I also agree on previous DAC statements. lots of Asian products in NOS and Upsampling gear and all very reasonable and a tempting way to jack the music up to another level. I think these cheaper DACS best serve mass market transports and multi-disc players. You may not notice much difference between that setup and the 5001 in net musicality except you will then have extra gear, connectors and cabling to worry about. ( this from a guy who likes to roll the dice with Chinese gear every now and then.) Have fun.

[Bigmoney]

I really am interested in the mmg's. But I wouldn't being true to myself without a few more questions about them. As I pay very close attention to my threads I noticed you reccomend a 12 inch sub with the mmg's wich I already have (crystalacoustics). Another post reccomended an inch sub or 10 inch sub. I wonder if mine would keep up. As others have mentioned the mmgs are fast. I wouldn't want to have to purchase another sub nor could I afford it. Many metion the mimaging is different such that a guitar seems to extend across the soundstage. That doesn't sound like the true image. How do mmgs image in your opinion?

[blackraven]

I have to disagree with a 12" sub to go with the MMG's, unless your planning on spending $1.5K or more on a non ported servo controlled sub. Plannar speakers are very "fast". And typically ported and larger subs do not match well with Planars because they are not "fast enough. Bass tends to sound slightly muddy or out of sync with planars such as magnepans. The larger subs have too much unwanted woofer movement. They don't dampen as well. Stick with a nice 8' or 10" sub, preferably non ported or servo controlled.
Thats why I recommend the Martin Logan dynamo for the the smaller magnepan speakers.
REL subs also work very well as do the velodyne spl subs and many other very expensive subs.
I used a velodyne CHT-8 with my MMG's and it sounded ok, as long as you kept the volume down and the crossover set to about 55Hz.( I feel that a sub should be set so that it disappers into the music so you cant really hear that its there). The MMG's only go down to 50hz after about 50hours of breakin. If you want heavy bass from a sub paired with Magnepans then plan on spending alot of money on a sub.

Don't let this deter your from the MMG's. They have great sound at a low price, and if you can push them out to the corners of your room a little, bass will go sound lower and deeper. And once you get hooked on planars, you will only want bigger and better planars. If your interested in the MMG's you might want to look for a pair of used MG12's.
They have much bigger and better sound and you can get by without a sub.

[daviethek]

Yes, please don't discount the MMG's . Tons of speaker for the money. Incredible presence, speed and musical timbre. I didn't even use those words until I had some MMG's I found them incredible for classical and jazz. Its hard to find similar sounding conventional speakers after you've had them in your system, they are that good. But, they are a bit different and probably not for everyone. They need more operating room than a classic bookshelf. I respect the opinion about using a sub less than 12 inch. Mine seemed to bounce favborably with the stats on my wood floors and many acoustic obstructions in my listening area, but in retrospect, maybe a 10 inch or 8 inch would have been more appropriate.

[Feanor]

I really am interested in the mmg's. But I wouldn't being true to myself without a few more questions about them. As I pay very close attention to my threads I noticed you reccomend a 12 inch sub with the mmg's wich I already have (crystalacoustics). Another post reccomended an inch sub or 10 inch sub. I wonder if mine would keep up. As others have mentioned the mmgs are fast. I wouldn't want to have to purchase another sub nor could I afford it. Many metion the mimaging is different such that a guitar seems to extend across the soundstage. That doesn't sound like the true image. How do mmgs image in your opinion?

I ran MMGs for quite awhile with my PSB Subsonic 6 sub with very good results. However I believe what is necessary for best results is keep the deepest bass (<80Hz) out of the MMGs. To do this, you a high-pass filter for the MMGs. The Subsonic 6 had a line-level 80Hz high-pass which worked well; i.e. feed my preamp to the SS6 and back from the latter's high-pass to my power amp. Of course I set the SS6's low-pass filter for 80Hz to complement the high-pass.

This approach is by far-and-away the best use of MMG and allows them to used to good effect with virtually any type of music.

[Feanor]

I have to disagree with a 12" sub to go with the MMG's, unless your planning on spending $1.5K or more on a non ported servo controlled sub. Plannar speakers are very "fast". And typically ported and larger subs do not match well with Planars because they are not "fast enough. Bass tends to sound slightly muddy or out of sync with planars such as magnepans. The larger subs have too much unwanted woofer movement.
...

I used a 12" PSB Subsonic 6 with my MMGs without integration problems -- see my post above. However I do strongly recommend an 80 high- & 80 low-pass arrangement with the MMGs. This largely alleviates the MMGs energy limitation with bass-intense music such as rock or orchestral crescendos, and ensures decent integration.

[blackraven]

I found my MMG's sounded best with the crossover set to50-60Hz.. I think speaker placement and enviroment has alot to do with it

[Bigmoney]

My sub only has a line level input therefore no crossover. Could I use an external high pass and low pass filter? If so, how do I do this?

[Feanor]

My sub only has a line level input therefore no crossover. Could I use an external high pass and low pass filter? If so, how do I do this?

First would be an purpose-specific sub/main high+low pass device. I have a Paradigm X-30 that has a variable low-pass filter and phase control for the sub, plus 50,80, and 120 high-pass filters for the output to the main speakers. Unfortunately Paradigm doesn't make them any more.

A second option would be a pro-style crossover unit such as this Behringer CX2310 (http://www.behringer.com/CX2310/index.cfm?lang=ENG). This has lots of flexibility and can be used for bi-amping as well as controlling a sub. A down side is that it only accepts XLR connectors so you would need adaptors or hybrid interconnects to connect to RCA.

In the same vein but much more expensive would be an "audiophile" Marchand (http://www.marchandelec.com/) crossover.

A third, simple and low-cost option would be in-line filters such as these FMOD (http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&Partnumber=266-272)s, though I can't guaranteed audiophile results.

[Bigmoney]

I would be more inclined to getting the purpose specific sub. Any ideas?

[blackraven]

I would be more inclined to getting the purpose specific sub. Any ideas?


How much are you looking to spend on a sub? Here are some of my choices according to price Mirage or Energy S8 for about $350. Its a great budget sub, i found it very musical. Any of the mid $500 subs from HSU, Outlaw Audio, SVS, Velodyne. The Martin Logan Dynamo which is one of my favorites for music at $599, the REL T2 for about $800 and the Velodyne SPL's for about $1K.

[hermanv]

Whether you buy a CDP, a DAC or new speakers, my vote is for used. Go to Audiogon and take a look. Many online reviews are available for anything you find. Read the reviews carefully, the better reviewers usually make sense and will have experience with a wide range of products.

Digital devices kept improving for years, I'd stay away from any digital product over 10 years old.

[jrhymeammo]

Nice ideas and suggestions above, but I think hermanv nailed it. If I was to spend another $1k on a digital source, I would not go for Marantz SA8001. I think it's a good player, but I'm starting to think their proprietory HDAM buffer is hurting its potentials. But that does produce their so-called "warm" signature sound. I would love to hear O'Shag's feedback on this, but MF Tri-Vista DAC21 is REALLY starting to catch my attention for round $800.

JRA

[Ajani]

Nice ideas and suggestions above, but I think hermanv nailed it. If I was to spend another $1k on a digital source, I would not go for Marantz SA8001. I think it's a good player, but I'm starting to think their proprietory HDAM buffer is hurting its potentials. But that does produce their so-called "warm" signature sound. I would love to hear O'Shag's feedback on this, but MF Tri-Vista DAC21 is REALLY starting to catch my attention for round $800.

JRA

My guess (and I do mean guess) is that the Marantz is just the wrong choice for your system (system matching is always key)... I doubt there's anything wrong with the HDAM or any other technical aspect of the player.... Heck, it's the only $1K player not to be downgraded to class B by Stereophile this year (yep even the mighty Rega Apollo got dropped to class B this year) and with this review comment for its Technical Performance, I can't imagine there is anything 'technically' wrong with it:


It may be affordably priced, but the Marantz SA8001's measured performance is beyond reproach.—John Atkinson

[Bigmoney]

Why do you say it is the wrong choice. That is funny because I just demoed the 5001 in my house yesterday and didn't particularly like it. Must have something to do with synergy.

[Ajani]

Why do you say it is the wrong choice.

Because he doesn't seem to like the 'warm' sound of the Marantz... hence it was the wrong choice for him...


That is funny because I just demoed the 5001 in my house yesterday and didn't particularly like it. Must have something to do with synergy.

I thought you really liked the 5001....

[jrhymeammo]

what Ajani said.

I am, too, aware that SA8001 is listed in Class A components by Stereophile, and it means jackshjt to me. You could very well be right about the Synergy, but I believe half of "Synergy" is established based on listeners' taste/preference.

[blackraven]

Why do you think that the SA8001 is the wrong choice? I thought he was compalining about the brightness and fatigue of his system. And I dont think the 5001 sounds anything like the SA8001. I've heard them both and I think that the 8001 is in a different league from the 5001. I've also experienced first hand what the 8001 can do to tame a bright system sound. It will also improve the low end sound of his B&W speakers as well as overall warmth, detail and clarity of the sound. The 8001 is not the end all of cdp's and its not for every one but it compares favorably to players costing well over $1k and is one of the true bargains in Hi-Fi today at $700.

I agree with your comment jrhymeammo, about listeners taste and preference. Thats why we have so many choices in this money sucking hobby of Hi-Fi.

[Ajani]

what Ajani said.

I am, too, aware that SA8001 is listed in Class A components by Stereophile, and it means jackshjt to me. You could very well be right about the Synergy, but I believe half of "Synergy" is established based on listeners' taste/preference.

lol... I wasn't trying to say that you should like a component because of it's Stereophile rating (many people don't regard professional reviews and that's their prerogative)... I was merely speculating on whether there really is anything wrong with it's performance (specifically the HDAM you mentioned)... And based on its 'Technical Measurements' there shouldn't be anything wrong with it..... I give more weight to the technical measurements in Stereophile than either Manufacturers claims or Stereophile's subjective reviews.... But if you don't even regard technical measurments, well that's also your prerogative.

So I was just saying that the Marantz was probably just the wrong choice for your particular setup (whether because of synergy with your speakers, amp, room acoustics or just personal preferences)...

[Ajani]

Why do you think that the SA8001 is the wrong choice? I thought he was compalining about the brightness and fatigue of his system. And I dont think the 5001 sounds anything like the SA8001. I've heard them both and I think that the 8001 is in a different league from the 5001. I've also experienced first hand what the 8001 can do to tame a bright system sound. It will also improve the low end sound of his B&W speakers as well as overall warmth, detail and clarity of the sound. The 8001 is not the end all of cdp's and its not for every one but it compares favorably to players costing well over $1k and is one of the true bargains in Hi-Fi today at $700.

I agree with your comment jrhymeammo, about listeners taste and preference. Thats why we have so many choices in this money sucking hobby of Hi-Fi.

Huh? Why do I keep getting asked that question? I was saying it was the wrong choice for JRH because he doesn't like it for whatever reason.... hence it is the wrong choice for him...

And I also agree with JRH's comments about listener's taste and preferences... and like JRH I include all of that in System Synergy....

I think my initial point may have gotten lost because I mentioned Stereophile, so I'll try to rephrase it:

I doubt there's anything wrong with the performance of the Marantz HDAM, I suspect the product is just not what JRH was looking for....

I hope that is clearer now...

[blackraven]

I was thinking that it was implied that it was the wrong choice for Big Money. Sorry if I misunderstood! BM was complaining in a post about his system sounding too bright and fatiguing.

[Ajani]

I was thinking that it was implied that it was the wrong choice for Big Money. Sorry if I misunderstood! BM was complaining in a post about his system sounding too bright and fatiguing.

Cool... no worries... I actually think the 8001 should be a good choice for BM based on the same things you mentioned... and if I remember correctly, he initially found that even the cheaper 5001 helped to tame his system... though it seems he's having a different experience with the 5001 the 2nd time he's tried it in his setup... I'm not sure what if anything he's changed in his setup, since his initial encounter to alter his opinion of the 5001...

[jrhymeammo]

You see what audio magazines do to us good people? It's EVIL!!!

It has nothing to do with specs, but here is another interesting read..


http://www.high-endaudio.com/RR-FREMER.html#Links

[Ajani]

You see what audio magazines do to us good people? It's EVIL!!!

It has nothing to do with specs, but here is another interesting read..


http://www.high-endaudio.com/RR-FREMER.html#Links

LOL.... I'm not a die-hard fan of profesional reviews... I rate Stereophile and a few others mainly for their technical measurements... and I give their subjective reviews a modest amount of credit, because a) they have the honesty to admit that Class ratings aren't everything... Class A doesn't mean you will like a product nor will Class D mean that you will like the product less than a Class A product & b) It takes balls to claim that a $1K CD player is as good as a $6K one etc... But even so, I take their reviews for what they really are: JUST OPINIONS... some I agree with and some I don't... I don't think it's all coruption though as some take it to be... I guess I'm just middle-ground...

In the case of this article, I kind of agree with Michael Fremer... there was really no need to mention Fremer at all in the initial article and certainly not like that... If the guy has real accusations to make, then he should just make them...

[Mr Peabody]

Man, those guys sound like their exchange could have been lifted right off AR's board :)

[Bigmoney]

My set up has changed in that I have more properly placed acoustic panels and I now biwre my speakers. Also I changed my interconnects to bluejeans. My system, even while using the marantz el cheapo dvd, is not as bright already due to the changes I mentioned. Therefore, the 5001 doesn't serve the purpose of tame the brightness as much as it has already been tamed quite a bit. I have redefined what it is that I am loking to improving. That is, soundstage depth imaging and detail. The brightness is no longer a dominating factor in my system, I am actually quite happen with the more neutral sound I have obtained. Based on my new interests regarding a cdp, any new reccommendations or does the 8001 still win out. What about the cambridge player 640c? Keeping in mind I ultimately want to improve imaging what do you think?

[Mr Peabody]

Any place you can hear the Arcam 73t? This is the player I was going to put into my 2nd system until my CJ fell in my lap. Arcam very good.

I know it would be a risk because of no return but the used Conrad Johnson DAC's are your price or cheaper on Audiogon and even with some years on them will knock your socks off with sound stage and midrange. Their sound seduced me and still has me in a spell :)

[Feanor]

Any place you can hear the Arcam 73t? This is the player I was going to put into my 2nd system until my CJ fell in my lap. Arcam very good.

I know it would be a risk because of no return but the used Conrad Johnson DAC's are your price or cheaper on Audiogon and even with some years on them will knock your socks off with sound stage and midrange. Their sound seduced me and still has me in a spell :)

To tame brightness, I'd consider a tube preamp ahead of various other components. Older Conrad Johnson preamps look like good value for someone looking for the tube experience, (though they don't have remote controls). Newer ones, used, such as this PV14L (http://cls.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?preatube&1210809985), are compeditive price-wise with ARC, BAT, Sonic Frontiers, etc. For that matter, all these used tube units represent great value to the enthusiast, IMO.

[Mr Peabody]

The PV14 would definitely be a nice addition and has remote. I think it's more than he wanted to spend though. I'm not sure what the difference is between the 14 and the 14ls2. I found my preamp and exceptional value. It gave micro and macro dynamics that I previously only heard in very expensive solid state gear. SS may have an advantage in the extreme low octaves. The CJ does present a great sound stage with amazing depth. The depth may be something to get used to from using SS. With my Krell even subtle detail seemed to be delivered with the same emphasis where CJ may have it in the background more. I haven't mixed my preamp with a lot of other SS amps. I fed through my Krell integrated amp's theater input once and to my Adcom 5400. I know this may go against the "tube pre/SS power" crowd but with that limited experience I did not like the combo. And that's taking into the account that the "Theater Through" may not have been the same as a true preamp input and the 5400's weaknesses. The overall improvement with it on the front end of the Adcom was big but there's something I hear in the SS/tube mix that don't sit well with me. Maybe I just need the right combo for correct synergy. With this in the back of my mind I hate to make general recommendations of mixing SS/tube. When I have time I want to put the 5500 into my main system to see what happens. The 5500 being a darker background and not quite as bright as the 5400 may be a better match. I can also see how the Krell might not mix with CJ being total opposite, for the most part, in presentation. As you can tell I like the CJ sound but it is a "house sound" which also may make it more difficult to find synergy with other gear. With that being said I had the CJ DAC, which is solid state, in both my Krell and now on the front of my Adcom gear and it seemed to blend very well in both. So I suspect my problem is not so much the "house sound" as it is with an issue with my preference and the mix of tube and SS pre/power. I know many have done this and feel it was very successful but I wonder how many have ever gone the last step to try a tube power amp. Tube power has it's limitations, which are getting fewer and fewer with modern technology. but the all tube chain is quite nice. The largest hurdle is the expense of tube power to drive less sensitive speakers.

There are usually older CJ preamps in his budget price or less. Remote will depend on how old.

[Bigmoney]

I am a little confused. I thought the consensus was that a cdp would be the way to go in my situation and that DAC'S under a grand were not worth it. Also I just bought the rotel 1070 preamp per your reccommendation. Just confused why you would reccommend preamps when I just purchased one that I really like. I would like to keep my rotel amp and pre because I got very good deals and just purchased them. I am not looking to replace them. Are you reccommending replacing them already? I would much rather get a nice cdp that has the characteristics that I am looking for...........

[jrhymeammo]

Big Money,

Are you shopping in a used market, such as Audiogon? $1000 new doesnt get you much in Audio, but you can find some great used gears for $1000.






To tame brightness, I'd consider a tube preamp ahead of various other components. Older Conrad Johnson preamps look like good value for someone looking for the tube experience, (though they don't have remote controls). Newer ones, used, such as this PV14L (http://cls.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?preatube&1210809985), are compeditive price-wise with ARC, BAT, Sonic Frontiers, etc. For that matter, all these used tube units represent great value to the enthusiast, IMO.

I had considered entry level C-J Preamp, but their choice of tubes did not look very appealing to me.
Mr. P, have you retubed your CJ? If so, have you found any specific tubes that seem to work best?

I love Rollin'

JRA

[Bigmoney]

When you say a thousand doesn't get you much are you referring to cdp's are what more specifically.

[Feanor]

I am a little confused. I thought the consensus was that a cdp would be the way to go in my situation and that DAC'S under a grand were not worth it. Also I just bought the rotel 1070 preamp per your reccommendation. Just confused why you would reccommend preamps when I just purchased one that I really like. I would like to keep my rotel amp and pre because I got very good deals and just purchased them. I am not looking to replace them. Are you reccommending replacing them already? I would much rather get a nice cdp that has the characteristics that I am looking for...........

Sorry, B/m, I was going off on a tangent. There's nothing wrong with the 1070.

I was only observing that as between a new CDP and a tube preamp you might hear more difference, (and maybe improvement), by going for the latter. But as for your decission to go with the CDP first, lots of people will agree, including Mr. P most likely.

[blackraven]

BM, if I had my choice of the CA 640c v.2 vs the 8001, I would go with the Marantz. Its got better low end and smoothness plus the ability to play SACD. The 640c has detail and transparency with a more neutral to bright sound. If your looking for transparency then consider the MusicHall Cd25.2. When I bought mine I wanted a transparent CDP and was looking at both the 640c and 25.2 so I called www.spearitsound.com and spoke to the guys there and they recommended the MusicHall over the Cambridge 640c. You might want to talk with them and get their opinion since they sell both units. They may have different recommendations based on your components and sound. I know they wont recommend the Marantz since they dont sell it and they think SACD is dead.

In the end though, given how you describe the sound of your system, I think the 8001 may be a better match.

[Bigmoney]

hmmmmm..........when referring to transparency in audio do you mean clarity or imaging. I know the generic meaning, but what does transparency pertain to for an audiophile. I thin the music hall may be more what I am looking for. Also I have hear the cambridge units can be unreliable. As I may be purchasing used, I would not be willing to take the chance with a unit possibly out of warranty. Considering my goals, imaging, detail, depth, soundstage, neutrality which cdps stick out in the 300- 1000 range. What do you think of universal players such as thte oppo, denon 2900 and 2800 for and all purpose player. I think I may be interested in DVD-A or hdcd in the future. That is why Im asking. Also, I am a little surprised the rotel 1070 or 1072 hasn't been mentioned a whole lot. Both have received wonderful reviews. The music hall and marantz seem to be gettting a lot of attention, keeping my needs in mind, and sytem synergy; which of the two do you reccomend?

[blackraven]

Transparency is the ability to get a clear picture of the music. Transparent CDP's tend to have more resolution and clarity. Its difficult to describe and easier to hear. I think that CDP's that have a less foward sound tend to appear to have a more transparent sound as well.

I still think that the Marantz 8001 will match your system better. As a person who has had both the MusicHall and the SA8001, I think that you would be much happier with the Marantz. In fact, the Paradigm store that I just visited, uses Marantz CDP's with their Rotel amps in their showroom. Plus if you ever decide to buy some good quality SACD's you will be amazed by the sound. Now if you wanted to spend $900 to $1K, I would recommend the Rega Apollo or CA 740c.

The Marantz is mentioned alot because it is one of the true bargains in sub $1K audio equipment and it got a stereophile class A rating for what ever that is worth. It also had great measurements when tested by stereophile. www.sterophile.com Another benefit is that it plays SACD's.

The MusicHall is another bargain CDP at $540 from www.hcmaudio.com The CD25.2 is comparable to some $1k CDP's in some respects and great if your on a budget.

[Bigmoney]

What about the al purpose players such as the denon. Reason I ask is that it retails at 999$, but there is one on audiogon for 300.

[Mr Peabody]

If you want to try SACD in the future I'd pick the 8001 over the Denon. Especially if you are trying to avoid additional brightness. All the Denon players I've heard struck me as being bright on the top end.

The CJ DAC's used cost under $1k depending on model but were over $1k and higher new. That's why buying used you can sometimes get a good bargain.

Sorry, I forgot when I was posting you had just purchased your pre/pwr.

[Ajani]

hmmmmm..........when referring to transparency in audio do you mean clarity or imaging. I know the generic meaning, but what does transparency pertain to for an audiophile. I thin the music hall may be more what I am looking for. Also I have hear the cambridge units can be unreliable. As I may be purchasing used, I would not be willing to take the chance with a unit possibly out of warranty. Considering my goals, imaging, detail, depth, soundstage, neutrality which cdps stick out in the 300- 1000 range. What do you think of universal players such as thte oppo, denon 2900 and 2800 for and all purpose player. I think I may be interested in DVD-A or hdcd in the future. That is why Im asking. Also, I am a little surprised the rotel 1070 or 1072 hasn't been mentioned a whole lot. Both have received wonderful reviews. The music hall and marantz seem to be gettting a lot of attention, keeping my needs in mind, and sytem synergy; which of the two do you reccomend?

The Rotel RCD-1072 is a great player and probably your best bet for system synergy... the Marantz is the most critically acclaimed and is the least likely to make your system sound bright again... I've also heard the Arcam CD73 with your Rotel gear and was very impressed.. The Arcam is also well respected...

The thing is that you have a lot of great options in CD players, so it really just comes down to which ones you can audition in your system... Since your dealer has both Marantz and Rotel, I'd suggest arranging either an in-home-trial of both or doing an in-store comparison...

[blackraven]

If your looking for a universal player, consider the Marantz DV7001. Stick with the Marantz 8001 over the Denon. If your not too concerned about brightness then go for the MH of 640c but realize they will make your sound brighter slightly.

[hermanv]

The CJ DAC's used cost under $1k depending on model but were over $1k and higher new. That's why buying used you can sometimes get a good bargain..
I sold Mr Peabody my used C-J DAC, based on his comments here and in other threads I guess I should have asked for more money. :)

Seriously though, I was so happy with the outboard DAC results that I ended up with one of the high price spreads that got great reviews. I've never regretted going that route and I've heard many CDP's since. Remember regardless of player price, only a couple of people make the internal transport mechanism. If it wears out and you own a fancy player, you need to pay big bucks to recover.

With an external DAC spend enough money for your CDP to get some reliability and a decent looking unit, all the heavy lifting will be done by the DAC.

[Mr Peabody]

At one time there were only a couple transport builders but I'm not sure any more. If so, there has to be different levels of quality because good players like Krell seem to run for years were the budget players are lucky to make 5 years. I've had pretty good luck with DVD players lasting though.

I only took the CJ because I felt sorry for you :) It does seem to have good synergy with the Adcom gear. I do owe you gratitude not only was it a good DAC, it got me started on CJ gear. At the time I didn't think it as good as my Krell but as well as it did show against it, one would be a good buy for what they are going for.

[blackraven]

My first CD player was a technic's SLPJ1 bought in the early 1980s and it lasted until 1996. At least 12 years until the laser went out. It had a port for an optical connection even though optical was not yet available.

[Ajani]

What about the al purpose players such as the denon. Reason I ask is that it retails at 999$, but there is one on audiogon for 300.

Based on price alone that would be a good deal... but I'm not sure that an all purpose player is the way you want to go...

Going for a universal DVD player is pretty much like buying a HT Receiver instead of seperates.... For products of the same price, you trade sound quality for more features/convenience...

[Brett A]

Going for a universal DVD player is pretty much like ...

A sport-luxury car may be sporty and luxurious, but won't handle as well as a sports car, nor would it be as comfortable as a luxury car.

An on/off road bike will do both, but will perform horribly compared to a dedicated road bike or trail bike.

I universal player will play many formats but not as well as players designed for each of those formats.

[Ajani]

A sport-luxury car may be sporty and luxurious, but won't handle as well as a sports car, nor would it be as comfortable as a luxury car.

An on/off road bike will do both, but will perform horribly compared to a dedicated road bike or trail bike.

I universal player will play many formats but not as well as players designed for each of those formats.

Good Analogy... last time I used a car analogy to compare HT & 2 Channel, I used SUV V Sportscar, which isn't nearly as smooth as the sport-luxury V sports/luxury or the bike one...

[Mr Peabody]

Brett, did you get your stuff over at Spearitsound?

[Brett A]

Brett, did you get your stuff over at Spearitsound?
Yes, almost all of it. I'm about 45 min from their Northampton store.

[Mr Peabody]

I thought you might seeing you were in MA and had their brands. That's were I got my CJ gear. I normally deal with Jack, and have had good experience with them.

[Brett A]

I thought you might seeing you were in MA and had their brands. That's were I got my CJ gear. I normally deal with Jack, and have had good experience with them.

I had all my dealing with Jim Metz. He was very helpful in connecting me to gear for my personal tastes/budget. He asked me a few simple questions and proceeded to send me home with loaner pieces. He was very supportive and generous in this way (I know...one should expect this from such a store.) Although at times he was a bit aloof. Regardless, he left me with the impression that he knows his gear and he knows his customers and knows just how to get the right piece to the right person. I'd recommend them for gear in the mid-range and up. ($1k+ major pieces)