Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326

    Analog video disk player

    Very few people knew this technology existed, even fewer have ever owned it. Here's a player and 150 titles on ebay.

    http://cgi.ebay.com/Electronic-Capac...item2560d2c8f5
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoffcin
    Very few people knew this technology existed, even fewer have ever owned it. Here's a player and 150 titles on ebay.

    http://cgi.ebay.com/Electronic-Capac...item2560d2c8f5

    In the early 80's when I was selling audio we had the RCA player on one tv and the Laser Disc player on another tv. The RCA had a stylus that traced the groove of the disc. In my youth I wondered why someone would choose a format that would create wear over a system read by a laser? As I remember the laser disc was superior.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  3. #3
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326
    Wow, I never even got a chance to see it in action. You would think that this high density analog technology would have made perfect sense for high quality audio. I wonder why it was never adapted?
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Site Moderator JohnMichael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    6,307
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacit...lectronic_Disc

    The Capacitance Electronic Disc (CED) was a video playback system developed by RCA, in which video and audio could be played back on a TV using a special analog needle and high-density groove system similar to phonograph records.

    First conceived in 1964, the CED system was widely seen as a technological success which was able to increase the density of a long-playing record by two orders of magnitude.[2] Despite this achievement, the CED system fell victim to poor planning, conflicts within RCA, and technical difficulties that stalled production of the system for 17 years until 1981, by which time it was outmoded by the DiscoVision (LaserDisc) and emerging Betamax and VHS videocassette formats. Sales for the system were nowhere near projected estimates, and by 1986, RCA had discontinued the project, losing an estimated $600 million in the process. RCA had initially intended to release the SKT425 CED player with their high end Dimensia system in 1984, but cancelled the CED player as part of the system just prior to the release of the Dimensia system.[3]

    The format was commonly known as "videodisc", leading to much confusion with the contemporary Laserdisc format. Laserdiscs were read optically with a laser beam, whereas CED videodiscs were read physically with a stylus, rather like a conventional gramophone record. The two systems were mutually incompatible.
    JohnMichael
    Vinyl Rega Planar 2, Incognito rewire, Deepgroove subplatter, ceramic bearing, Michell Technoweight, Rega 24V motor, TTPSU, FunkFirm Achroplat platter, Michael Lim top and bottom braces, 2 Rega feet and one RDC cones. Grado Sonata, Moon 110 LP phono.
    Digital
    Sony SCD-XA5400ES SACD/cd SID mat, Marantz SA 8001
    Int. Amp Krell S-300i
    Speaker
    Monitor Audio RS6
    Cables
    AQ SPKR and AQ XLR and IC

  5. #5
    Suspended atomicAdam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Oaktown!
    Posts
    1,774
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoffcin
    Wow, I never even got a chance to see it in action. You would think that this high density analog technology would have made perfect sense for high quality audio. I wonder why it was never adapted?
    How higher a quality of audio can analog get? Is there such a thing as hi-def analog? Isn't that just a bit thicker, cleaner, existing record?

  6. #6
    Silence of the spam Site Moderator Geoffcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by atomicAdam
    How higher a quality of audio can analog get? Is there such a thing as hi-def analog? Isn't that just a bit thicker, cleaner, existing record?
    More information is always better. It makes for a higher S/N ratio, and better high frequency response. Obviously digital technology put an end to any further development for analog playback, but it does make me wonder how far/better analog could have been if this technology was perfected for high fidelity audio use.
    Audio;
    Ming Da MC34-AB 75wpc
    PS Audio Classic 250. 500wpc into 4 ohms.
    PS Audio 4.5 preamp,
    Marantz 6170 TT Shure M97e cart.
    Arcam Alpha 9 CD.- 24 bit dCS Ring DAC.
    Magnepan 3.6r speakers Oak/black,

  7. #7
    Forum Regular Woochifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    6,883
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoffcin
    Very few people knew this technology existed, even fewer have ever owned it. Here's a player and 150 titles on ebay.
    I just looked up the CED Magic site. According to that site, about 500,000 CED players were sold. A lot of people knew about the format at that time -- RCA-owned NBC in particular blanketed the airwaves with CED player ads, better known as the Selectavision Videodisc. The CED format failed because the VCR had already taken hold by the time it came out in 1981, and because it was inferior in every way to the Laserdisc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Geoffcin
    Wow, I never even got a chance to see it in action. You would think that this high density analog technology would have made perfect sense for high quality audio. I wonder why it was never adapted?
    If analog LPs tried to improve performance by incorporating that conductive layering technique used in the CED format, I doubt it would have retained compatibility with existing analog LP equipment and discs. The audio side was well on its way to embracing optical technology, so any leaps and bounds in analog technology would have been a dead end.

    But, I recall that a lot of the technologies that made the CED format possible were incorporated into the existing analog LP market. For example, the CED format used linear tracking, which found its way into some turntables around that same time that were promptly dismissed by the audiophiles of the day.

    The CED mastering technique of cutting the signal source directly into a metal plate sounds very similar to Teldec's DMM process, which was used in a lot of vinyl LP releases beginning in the mid-80s. DMM mastering raised the S/N ratio, and allowed for vinyl LPs to store more than 40 minutes per side. Here too, the DMM process fell out of favor with audiophiles, and the vinyl market went back to traditional lacquer cutting.

    Also, that time period also saw the emergence of more advanced diamond cutting techniques, which made the CED format possible and also allowed for the development of more advanced stylii for LP playback. Recall that when the CED format was developed, most stylii used conical shapes. But, going with various elliptical shapes dramatically raised the frequency response (a byproduct of quad).
    Last edited by Woochifer; 01-30-2011 at 11:28 AM.
    Wooch's Home Theater 2.0 (Pics)
    Panasonic VIERA TH-C50FD18 50" 1080p
    Paradigm Reference Studio 40, CC, and 20 v.2
    Adire Audio Rava (EQ: Behringer Feedback Destroyer DSP1124)
    Yamaha RX-A1030
    Dual CS5000 (Ortofon OM30 Super)
    Sony UBP-X800
    Sony Playstation 3 (MediaLink OS X Server)
    Sony ES SCD-C2000ES
    JVC HR-S3912U
    Directv HR44 and WVB
    Logitech Harmony 700
    iPhone 5s/iPad 3
    Linksys WES610



    The Neverending DVD/BD Collection

    Subwoofer Setup and Parametric EQ Results *Dead Link*

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •