Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    13

    Int. amp for a 2.1 setup...

    Looking to upgrade HT receiver to something with a little more power. At the moment have an Onkyo Tx-Ds494. Its rated at 50w per channel at 8 ohms. Speakers are Platinum Audios pt801, 8 ohms. Recommended input 25-120 watts. I would like to get them a little more power and open them up. Looking at the NAD 325bee, maybe the 352. Will also be running a powered sub with these for the whole 2.1 getup.

    Number one, will I notice much upgrading from the older onkyo HT, to the NAD intergrated?

    Number two, where can I find a NAD used in the states?
    Last edited by bwanac; 10-01-2006 at 07:41 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Regular paul_pci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,246
    Unfortunately it's hard to say whether you'll notice a difference and whether that difference will correlate to the money you spend. One first step would be to try and listen to your speakers on different amp equipment at local stores, otherwise, it might well be a crap shoot, but it's a crapy shoot some people really enjoy experimenting with.

    As for finding used equipment, check out: www.audiogon.com

  3. #3
    Man of the People Forums Moderator bobsticks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    down there
    Posts
    6,852
    Hey bwanac,

    Welcome to the forum. NAD makes some very good products, but let me offer up something else for your consideration. The Outlaw RR2150 has gotten some esceelent reviews and is a product that is designed specifically for your application. Proper integration of a sub can be troublesome and the RR2150 has an onboard bass management system and Sub-Out to simplify matters. You can check out one review at:
    http://stereophile.com/integratedamps/306outlaw/

    Happy hunting
    So, I broke into the palace
    With a sponge and a rusty spanner
    She said : "Eh, I know you, and you cannot sing"
    I said : "That's nothing - you should hear me play piano"

  4. #4
    Phila combat zone JoeE SP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,710
    Quote Originally Posted by bwanac
    Looking to upgrade HT receiver to something with a little more power. At the moment have an Onkyo Tx-Ds494. Its rated at 50w per channel at 8 ohms. Speakers are Platinum Audios pt801, 8 ohms. Recommended input 25-120 watts. I would like to get them a little more power and open them up. Looking at the NAD 325bee, maybe the 352. Will also be running a powered sub with these for the whole 2.1 getup.

    Number one, will I notice much upgrading from the older onkyo HT, to the NAD intergrated?

    Number two, where can I find a NAD used in the states?
    Please note the .1 used to describe output channels does not apply to 2 channel stereo. The .1 applies to the LFE (low frequency effects) channel in Dolby Digital and DTS multichannel sound. There is no LFE channel in 2 channel stereo. Consequently there is no such thing as 2.1 stereo!

    The best place to look for used audio equipment is www.audiogone.com
    ARC SP9 MKIII, VPI HW19, Rega RB300
    Marcof PPA1, Shure, Sumiko, Ortofon carts, Yamaha DVD-S1800
    Behringer UCA222, Emotiva XDA-2, HiFimeDIY
    Accuphase T101, Teac V-7010, Nak ZX-7. LX-5, Behringer DSP1124P
    Front: Magnepan 1.7, DBX 223SX, 2 modified Dynaco MK3's, 2, 12" DIY TL subs (Pass El-Pipe-O) 2 bridged Crown XLS-402
    Rear/HT: Emotiva UMC200, Acoustat Model 1/SPW-1, Behringer CX2310, 2 Adcom GFA-545

  5. #5
    Crackhead Extraordinaire Dusty Chalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    below the noise floor
    Posts
    3,636
    Actually, 2.1 is a fairly common marketing term to describe a two-satellites-and-a-sub setup.
    Eschew fascism.
    Truth Will Out.
    Quote Originally Posted by stevef22
    you guys are crackheads.
    I remain,
    Peter aka Dusty Chalk

  6. #6
    Phila combat zone JoeE SP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,710
    Quote Originally Posted by Dusty Chalk
    Actually, 2.1 is a fairly common marketing term to describe a two-satellites-and-a-sub setup.
    That doesn't change the fact that there is no such thing as 2.1 stereo.
    ARC SP9 MKIII, VPI HW19, Rega RB300
    Marcof PPA1, Shure, Sumiko, Ortofon carts, Yamaha DVD-S1800
    Behringer UCA222, Emotiva XDA-2, HiFimeDIY
    Accuphase T101, Teac V-7010, Nak ZX-7. LX-5, Behringer DSP1124P
    Front: Magnepan 1.7, DBX 223SX, 2 modified Dynaco MK3's, 2, 12" DIY TL subs (Pass El-Pipe-O) 2 bridged Crown XLS-402
    Rear/HT: Emotiva UMC200, Acoustat Model 1/SPW-1, Behringer CX2310, 2 Adcom GFA-545

  7. #7
    Crackhead Extraordinaire Dusty Chalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    below the noise floor
    Posts
    3,636
    I'm not sure what distinction you're trying to make.
    Eschew fascism.
    Truth Will Out.
    Quote Originally Posted by stevef22
    you guys are crackheads.
    I remain,
    Peter aka Dusty Chalk

  8. #8
    test the blind blindly emorphien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    919
    I won't hesitate to recommend NAD, I like the sound and look and overall quality. Outlaw is good too, and with the bass management and sub out, it's very much worth a look. I have the NAD C320BEE which makes adding a sub a bit trickier but with some NADs having an extra pre-out that's not such an issue.

    I'm currently using my C320BEE with just my bookshelf speakers but I plan to add a sub soon.

  9. #9
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    13
    Finally, I can login.

    Yes I know where the whole .1 designation came from. But using it gives an immediate sense of what I am working with.

    Anyways, I will be checking Audiogon for some deals. The Outlaw looks good. However, its being backordered and it being more than I plan on spending Ill continue to look for used gear.

    If I may ask emorphien, how do you plan on wiring up your subwoofer with your NAD? Also, are there any good local stores where I may go and check gear out. I attend U of Rochester, so since youre local you would know better than I.

    Thanks for the help. Ill keep searching. Ive reasoned that I shouldnt need more than 50-60W to get some good power to these speakers.

  10. #10
    test the blind blindly emorphien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    919
    Hey bwanac, I'm a grad student at RIT so nice to meet you!

    If you're interested in NAD I'd suggest going to the Sound Concept on Monroe Avenue. They're very nice people and very accomodating, they gave me some great deals on my equipment (bought the C542 and C320BEE from them). They'll give you their opinions and seem pretty knowledgeable but are not pushy at all. They certainly know that since some of us think spending $1000 is a lot, trying to push $30k speakers on us won't do any good. They're also the only NAD dealer anywhere nearby.

    I'm tumbling two subwoofer connection ideas. Several people have recommended to me that I try a pair of splitter cables for the pre-amp->amp bridge on the int. amp and using the split to send RCA cables to the low level inputs on the sub (I'm considering the AV123 X-sub after all the reviews I've read, it's perfect for a little extension in a small room). The other approach would be to just loop the speaker lines through it, which I suppose is more conventional and I know will work, although a bit more of a PITA.

    I'm not sure about leeching the pre-amp loop, I don't know what kind of signal degredation that might incur and I'm a little hesitant to go that route although it's probably worth a shot once I get the sub (and I have no idea when I'll do that).

  11. #11
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    13
    So... Ive settled for now on an older Rotel model, the RA985bx. Its going to be a lot of power to my speakers, 100w per channel, but I know they will handle it accordingly. Right now I am going through looking at building some new speaker wires, and possibly when the amp arrives seeing if I really need my old subwoofer in my system anymore. Its not very good with music and feel I may just sell it until I come along a good deal.

    Ill get an update in when the amp arrives on Friday or so.

  12. #12
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    13
    Wow... big improvement. The clarity the soundstage the dynamics this has really opened up my speakers and sounds very nice. It is also extremely powerful... way too much power for my needs I think. But more power is always better.

    I have a question. Right now I dont have my subwoofer hooked up. I would like to understand my options.

    -Number one is looping the speaker wires through it.
    -Number two, this amp has the option of A+B speakers at same time. Can I hook the sub up to Speaker B, and then when I want to use it swtich from Speaker A to Speaker A+B? (This is only considered because I am unsure how this amp is set-up, are the A and B sets in series or parallel?)
    Last edited by bwanac; 10-21-2006 at 02:29 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •