NAD C352 vs NAD C320BEE

Printable View

  • 11-03-2004, 03:17 PM
    k3nnis
    NAD C352 vs NAD C320BEE
    Hi there.

    Anyone here compared these 2 integrated amps before?:) If yes do they sound different sonically? I know the C352 has more power but was wondering how about sound quality wise? Are they the same components except the 352 has more power?

    Cheers.
    Kenn.
  • 11-03-2004, 04:17 PM
    uzibear
    i've heard nasty things on head-fi about the 320bee, so you might want to look there
  • 11-03-2004, 04:32 PM
    k3nnis
    Hi there.

    Thanks for the reply. Hmm thats really odd as from what i have read in reviews they seem to be all praises for the C320BEE, maybe the headphone out is not good? But the speaker out is good?

    I won't be using headphones though.

    Cheers.
    Kenn.
  • 11-03-2004, 09:05 PM
    RGA
    Listen I like NAD - but what i heard from the NAD 320Bee at my dealer is a disaster of an amplifier. My dealer carries NAD has for years and the 320Bee has piles of good reviews. But in our A/B comparisons this amp had serious problems creating a realistic soundstage - It resembles sounding out of phase - it's not but it gives the impression. My dealer asked NAD if they changed parts or suppliers etc which might explain why the amps he got sound like that - NAD told him everything is fine.

    Let's put it this way - the sound was so bad I would rather listen to my Marantz 4300 Receiver - and that is bad enough IMO.
  • 11-03-2004, 09:07 PM
    RGA
    Ohh

    The 352 an 372 are both good for the money - you might like something better of course but these are worth your time for sure. So might a 320Bee - do an ab against some others.
  • 11-03-2004, 10:16 PM
    k3nnis
    Hi there.

    Yeah i will do a A/B against 320BEE and C352. The C372 is out of my price range unfortunately.

    Cheers.
    Kenn.
  • 11-10-2004, 12:35 PM
    nallyvaico
    PLs let us know the result of your a/b'ing...