Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    ∩↔▼╨Φ Registered Member RuiDO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4

    Rotel RA-1070 <<-->> NAD C372

    Integrated Musical differences comparison for those?

  2. #2
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    I own the RA-1070...I also looked at a few NADs, Arcam, Parasound, and PS Audio. I own two other integrateds, 3020, and 3140 from way back, always been a big fan.
    Relatively speaking, the NAD was just a bit brighter, and didn't produce as warm, natural a sound as the Rotel, very close other than that.
    I can't really put my finger on it, I really liked the NAD, but I fell in love with the Rotel. Maybe I just wanted something different. I suspect your speakers could influence your decision...either way you'll end up with an excellent piece of gear.

  3. #3
    Forum Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    727

    Hmmm...

    Quote Originally Posted by kexodusc
    Relatively speaking, the NAD was just a bit brighter, and didn't produce as warm, natural a sound as the Rotel, .
    I haven't listened to anything from these two brands in years but wasn't it historically reversed - that the NAD's sounded warm and the Rotel's a bit brighter but closer to neutral than the NAD's? I'm not questioning what you heard but it would be sort of funny if the two brands sonic signature reversed themselves over the last decade or so!

  4. #4
    Loving This kexodusc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Department of Heuristics and Research on Material Applications
    Posts
    9,025
    Ha ha...I get that alot...in all honesty, I found the nads bass and highs a bit too over done...the midrange seemed relatively lacking...a bit different than how I'd describe either of my older NAD integrateds, which tend to have rich bass and pleasing mids...and are a bit on the warm side of the spectrum...borderline they can be a bit low in detail at lower volumes.

    I've never actually heard any Rotel gear other than my integrated so, but I was told they were either bright, or neutral...I'd say it was brighter than some of the others I tried out, but it seemed more evenly balanced than the NAD, that's for sure.
    Again, this was all done on MY speakers, so take it for what it's worth, but the NAD was DEFINITELY brighter than the Rotel.

    Some people have suggested to me that the newer front ends on NAD integrateds and their pre-amps have changed a bit over the years and their power amps still retain their signature sound? I don't go that that far into it...mostly I just go with a subconscious gut feeling of what sounds best rather than WHY it sounds best.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. which one is better rotel rcd1072 or rcd 1070
    By naorsm in forum General Audio
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-31-2004, 11:25 AM
  2. Rotel RSP-976 vs. Adcom GTP-830
    By Demetrio in forum Amps/Preamps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-11-2004, 09:47 AM
  3. Rotel RSP-976 vs. Adcom GTP-830
    By Demetrio in forum Home Theater/Video
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-11-2004, 09:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •